so the A200 / A300 / A350 all have a +30 on the numbering, what's the major upgrade ah?

megapixel seems same, body looks different. what else are the changes?

---

Added on June 10, 2009, 3:15 am*k, besides the body (look and ergonomics) and the image processing engines.

This post has been edited by goldfries: Jun 10 2009, 03:15 AM

the SAL 1870 comes with lens hood?

nmind, i just remember i took this photo..........



should be this one la, the VERY SHORT one.

looks like twin-kit lens bundle is still there but SAL-1870 - 18-70mm f/3.5-5.6 Zoom Lens now change to DT 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 Standard Zoom Lens.

i wonder why, wouldn't the 18-70 be a more attractive option?

yes, my POV is that 18-55 to 18-70, the difference very little, in fact probably too little to cause much difference between CA and softness BUT 70 does give a little MORE in zoom and numerically speaking looks better too.

how significant are the improvements anyway?

how much improvement on the image processing part?

i'm more interested with the said improvements on the sensor found in the new bodies.

someone told me better not get A300, cos A200 still better in IQ / image processing. so ok la, now i want to see how A230 / A330 is.

cos i see the price difference quite a lot leh. so i was wondering what IMPROVEMENTS do they have.

download the RAW plugin.

http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html

of course, find the version for CS2 la.

this one really good job la.

doesn't look like there's any grip.

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores...552921644548357

doesn't look like there's any grip.

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores...552921644548357

that analogy explains the concept of light through the lens.

not the effect of it. which is why like it so much.

need opinion, my fren looking for camera around RM 1.5k. new unit.

i checked out the A200 and seems like it's just a little over RM 1.5k (around 1.6k). is there any place selling it at or below RM 1.5k?

or any shops that sell cheap lor.

i'm sure topping up RM 100 is not an issue la but i just want to know if i could help a friend better.

after that, i guess i have to give him tutorial on how to use the A200.

i think would be 1599 la. 1399 is ridiculously low already. but would be good if it's possible. anyone going Boeing?

Nice list. I think can add the 18-250 or something. Some of my Alpha using friends use them, which i think is really good for walkabout lens cos of coverage.

The Tam is great if you want constant aperture and sharp lens.

Personally i like the Cz but price on the high side.

no such thing as BEST SETTING for all. It all depends on what outcome you're looking for.

there's no way to say NORMAL or SUITABLE.

really. for example, you want the background really OOF, moderately OOF, or clear?

are you using natural lights, flash, multiple flash? if so, from what direction is the light? and how strong are they?

see, there's so many things. given a set scenario, you can use varying settings and the effects will vary, so in the end it's up to you.

BUT if you really want simple, set to P. or Av with widest aperture chosen lor.

put it this way la.

can we and should we are 2 different things. but will answer your question in both POV.

if you're saying "will it work?" as in lens not attached but will the shutter still function - YES.

if you're saying "will it spoil?" as in any negative effect? Nah, don't worry. or else how to clean sensor?

eh i thought you all new tech stuff sure get straight. i'm surprised you're not having F58 yet.