Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies LYN Official TRANSFORMERS Movie Thread: V2, Next: Transformers 3 - July 1st, 2011

views
     
SUSgogo2
post Jul 9 2009, 02:18 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(alanyuppie @ Jul 9 2009, 02:10 PM)
Well, low quality or not, thats your own point of view. and I gladly accept that POV smile.gif

Laughing is good for health. being critical is fine too, but I think I leave that to more serious matter like work/health/environment/family which involves my life in reality. As for entertainment/movies,  I wont equip my "critical" ammunition and go all out in hitting the target.  That is my definition of "high quality":- we make the best of what we paid for, and no matter how many flaws in the movie.. we try out very best to enjoy its +ve moments. As for TF2 ,I found myself having do so.... really overcamed its few minor lame jokes scenes, and awed at the battle scenes that lasted much longer than the lame-jokes scene.

Same like eating a durian. If you complain smelly or hurt your finger from its thorns, you can said... "low quality fruit-lover deserve low-quality fruit". You havent even bothered to reach the stage to open up that durian (after hurting yourself/stuffing your nose). Other people might enjoy eating it already. "I am dissapointed in you for eating that durian!" LOL.
btw: I'm not a fan of durian (but doesnt meant I cant be in the shoes of durian lover!). Its all about acceptance different point of view and trying to be in their shoes, regardless of durian liking/age-group.
*
Yeah, I also accept you view that we shouldn't be so critical over such a small matter. But the problem is, we're in a forum.
So part of forum participation is being critical. Else, everyone will be singing praise to TF2... laugh.gif

In the durian example, you're actually agree that low quality audience deserve low quality film. If you don't bother to open the durian (which
in this case to be critical and send signal to Bay), you won't be enjoying the durian (better quality film).

Conclusion:- Low quality audience deserve low quality film


Added on July 9, 2009, 2:19 pm
QUOTE(alanyuppie @ Jul 9 2009, 02:17 PM)
The reason why starscream has such body is because he is a jet plane, and the designers doesnt want him to overly tall compared to the rest of the bots. So they distribute his mass horizontally (aka wider and tri-obese)

If starcream really did transform into a humaniod upright shape, he will be much taller than Optimus and even Megatron. Kinda intimidating.
*
and thus, the ugly design sad.gif

This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 9 2009, 02:19 PM
SUSgogo2
post Jul 9 2009, 03:26 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(xin @ Jul 9 2009, 02:42 PM)
Ya, at least they get the characterization of Megatron and Starscream similar to it's comic/cartoon counterparts. "Starscream! You have failed me once again!" haha epic quotation from G1 Megatron.
*
Some people hate the fact that Megatron bow to Fallen. For example in cartoon movie Transformers, megatron don't want to bow to Unicron
but only do so because he's at the mercy of Unicron.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 10 2009, 10:28 AM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Vinci777 @ Jul 10 2009, 10:25 AM)
Haha. You guys wont want starscream to go to the Smithsonian air museum, scan a aircraft, transform, pose, and let audience check den proceed to the next aircraft until the audience satisfied. LOL
*
Come on. I believe no one, 100% no one, will think Bay Starscream is nice. No need to check audience. As long as there's no
weird shape like triangle, then its nice dy.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 10 2009, 12:27 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Vinci777 @ Jul 10 2009, 11:23 AM)
Well because like nimrod describe, its a F22 Jet. Maybe Bay fold his wings and make him look like a triangle to differentiate him from Megatron. Normal userd hardly can recognize both of them because Decepts colors are similar.

Well the design is not cool at best but as long as its presentable unlike the proton juara. Im satisfied.  tongue.gif  tongue.gif
*
Erm, I don't think its presentable. Hahaha.... it looks like:
user posted image

At least juara still looks like car. tongue.gif
user posted image
QUOTE(ristikol @ Jul 10 2009, 12:03 PM)
this TF2 sucks than TF1
*
Yeah we know. It's official.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 10 2009, 01:00 PM
SUSgogo2
post Jul 10 2009, 11:31 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 10 2009, 09:24 PM)
i cant find optimus man,sigh plus TOYSRUS have a limit of 1 item per purchase.


Added on July 10, 2009, 9:29 pm

they better not make Fortress Maximus or Omega Supreme ugly in the next movie lol,if they have them at least. I want to see Grimlock,Springer,Defensor,Fortress Maximus, Omega Supreme, and possibly Jetfire back. Starscream's replica AllSpark is still in cybertron, but its still useless. Hopefully they'll expand on this plot.
*
luckily u haven't buy. Got new LC OP called Buster Prime. Its better version frm Takara.


This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 10 2009, 11:33 PM
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 02:37 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 14 2009, 02:10 PM)
huh i hated both. And they misled watchmen to be an action flick when it clearly wasnt one.
*
since you like TF2, we all know you hated watchmen. You don't have to say it also we know la.
We know that you watch movie because of action only. No story nevermind. Once again, you
proof yourself to be not worthy of great film. Low quality audience deserve low quality movie.
Please do not come in to prove yourself to be such again and again. I'm deeply disturbed by
low quality film and you're partly the reason to be blame for all the mindless action flick in the
world today. Shooooooo


Added on July 14, 2009, 2:45 pmpeople say its action flick and u go and watch...wth...

This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 14 2009, 02:45 PM
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 03:03 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 14 2009, 02:59 PM)
excuse me, whats wrong with you? lashing out on someone you barely know and blame them for your insecurities? Why is my liking of TF2 or any other action movie a problem to you? I didnt like Watchmen cause it was in my opinion false advertising and i wasnt following its comic, and i didnt like it for the gore and heavy violence that was in it, not my cup of tea. So what if i like to watch a movie for entertainment purpose and to wind down and relax? thats my preferences,hey if you like movie with storyline go ahead and watch it, its your money. I watched countless amount of movies with good story line, U571, The Untouchables, Tuesdays With Morrie, and countless others, but by doing that it doenst make me any less or more of champion/quality stuff. Watching a good or bad movie doesnt enhance anything on you, unless you are the type who projects your self and ideals through watching movies that are so called "great", makes your ego even bigger does it now? You should blame yourself for your dislikes. Its like blaming me for eating Mat kool Ice cream just because you hate it and by me continuing to eat it makes you even more hateful to the fact that nestle is producing Mat kool for the likes of me. If you dont like the so called "mindless/brainless flick" avoid it,no1 asked you or compelled you to watch it, dont waste your money and keep your opinion to yourself and seriously i dont give 2 shit about your low quality equates to low quality audience hypothesis cause it only applies to you and you only,dont try to enforce it on me or other people.
*
But you also have opinion on Watchmen. Why can't I? I also never read Watchmen comic. But its good enough for me to enjoy. laugh.gif
Someone got pissed over a TF2 movie.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 03:15 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(alanyuppie @ Jul 14 2009, 03:10 PM)
It baffles me why you keep attacking people's personal taste on movies. Just accept and move on, dude.

Different people different taste. We have the rights to dislike the movie you define as epic and great, and vice versa.

Do we need to bow to you and praise you for your uber "great" taste in movies and learn to appreciate movies like the way you do?
*
no need la. We just discuss only mah. But it is a fact that ROTF is shitty movie. Even in TFW2005 that its being branded that way.
Why you guys never accept the obvious leh?


Added on July 14, 2009, 3:16 pm
QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 14 2009, 03:15 PM)
ah but clearly i didnt crucify the person for saying he liked the movie like your emotional outburst. I didnt say stuff like because he liked watchmen he is low quality or because of people like him its the reason for movies like watchmen are created. I dont blame him for that, i dont blame him for watching it,i respect his preference i dont say stuff like he is low quality audience just because i didnt like watchmen. Clearly its evident you are pissed with TF2 your continued anger towards and bashing of people who watch this movie is clearly evidenced from this thread alone, so what if people liked it, you dont have to crucify them for that and resort to bashing and call them names.
*
low quality audience is not really calling them name. I dun say they are stupid etc. You have to differentiate between this two yo


Added on July 14, 2009, 3:18 pmbut seriously, I can't help it when you said you're being duped into watching because its action movie. You like a movie not because its action or not. Its whether the movie is good or not. Can you understand or not yo?

This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 14 2009, 03:18 PM
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 03:25 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 14 2009, 03:21 PM)
haha generalizing again i guess? its clear that you are putting people down for liking the movie, low quality equates to not of par/standards/level, you made it very clear that people who dont share your ideals and the way you see movies are below your greatness. And if you clearly checked in my post i didnt imply you said stupid, but putting down people using terms like "low quality" and "dont deserve" and this kind of things equates to an insult, insults come in different forms this is clearly one of it.
*
ok la. Since u wan to put it that way. But I really want good movie. Do u wan good story movie with good action? Why
we not co-operate together to give signal to director that a good action movie needs a good story oso. Will you be more
happy?
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 04:06 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(alanyuppie @ Jul 14 2009, 03:50 PM)
This might explain the suprising "long lapse" of his respond (if he ever intend to) after the outburst,compared to just now. I hope we get quality rebuttal without half-baked insults and non-repetitive ones.

Sigh. cant even rate movies as average these days. There are people hell bent on insisting us to kneel down and rate it as shitty and other "colourful" choices of words.

What happened to "respect each other's opinion and taste" ?
*
i'm not all the time online bro. I still need to work. laugh.gif anyway, you point is moot there.
There's always a consensus whether a movie is good or not. In this case TF2 is bad no matter
how you want to say about it. Furthermore, I don't do full insult because I don't believe in insult.
What I said is only regard what you're as TF2 fanboy. That is, you deserve that kind of movie
if you keep on insist you enjoy such a low quality movie.


Added on July 14, 2009, 4:07 pm
QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 14 2009, 03:33 PM)
I didnt say i was duped, i try to find some info on the Watchmen before watching it, read some synopsis of the comic book, and realized that it was more of like a bit of V,in terms of story telling, anarchy and other values fill it. When the advertisements and all the marketing materials pointed it too be action based i thought okay maybe its a nice twist to the story and also its values, but when i watched the movie it was waaaay different then it was advertised, probably i should read the comic book to have an estimation of what it should be. I told you already i watch movies purely for winding down an entertainment purpose cause it lets you relax, it doesnt matter what movie i watch as long as it does the job then im fine with it. I judge a movie based on several different criterias and action is not my primary objective but i'll be furious if it has false  advertising like the likes of The Spirit!
*
ok, false advertising is bad. I agree with ya.


Added on July 14, 2009, 4:11 pm
QUOTE(nimrod323 @ Jul 14 2009, 04:01 PM)
imo, Megatron and Starscream were just using The Fallen for their own personal agendas. If the matrix did its job,Megatron and Starscream would have tagteam and finish off the fallen.

they wont revive the fallen he was just a means to get the energon,prime just did the job for them. Starscream has a replica Allspark in cybertron,they'd probably try to revive that one.


Added on July 14, 2009, 4:03 pm

they even expect us to bend down to critics that emulate their way of thinking. And whatever that comes from critics cant be disputed and must be taken as the final verdict and we have to keep our verdict to ourself and like mindless drones follow and harp on the critic's take on the movie, with no rebuttal whatosever.
*
again I would like to say that there's always a consensus on what is right and what is wrong in morality. In this case, there's a consensus that
TF2 is bad. Even other TF fans said so. I'm not saying this because its fun. TF is my number 1 childhood cartoon. So I dun dissed TF2 for the lulz.
I just dun like how Bay screw this movie.

I believe you guys have problem in understand what is consensus-ly bad movie and what not.

This post has been edited by gogo2: Jul 14 2009, 04:11 PM
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 04:15 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(xin @ Jul 14 2009, 04:12 PM)
what they are pointing out is enjoying a so called 'low quality' movie doesnt make one valid as a low quality audience. Better keep the quote for your own preferences.
*
I just want to point out that it will cause the director keep on churning out low quality movie. The consequences are bad. You will become liable as
low quality audience.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 04:44 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(xin @ Jul 14 2009, 04:41 PM)
Your quotation does not justify the cause for directors to continue producing low quality movies in future instead it pointed out that audiences that watch these 'low quality' movies are itself low quality viewers. You do note that some may not take the 'low quality audience' phrase easily right ?

Regardless it is low or high quality audiences, both has infact contributed to the gross when they got the ticket from cinema. So enjoying the movie is to make the best out of the money paid. The reviews and ratings can make its way from media to producers after that.

Take TF2 as example, i am sure Bay already knew that TF2 is really not up to par by now with all the reviews and being labeled as a bad movie in whole. As viewers we could just hope he can do better in TF3. The clear mesage has been conveyed to the producers and it is up to them to make the call from here.

hey~~i thought all this has stopped already lol.
*
i tot also.. until greylegion bump this thread... laugh.gif anyway, its fun discussion.. thanks guy
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 04:53 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(xin @ Jul 14 2009, 04:48 PM)
Lol, TF3 should be out on 2012 ... to think of it Bay did the right thing by going on a short hiatus so that he can revitalize and think of fresh ideas to implement. TF2 was made as soon as TF1 finished not long... which is a huge mistake.
*
i hope TF3 will be better. I heard TF2 is due to writer strike is it?
http://www.tfw2005.com/boards/transformers...ers-strike.html

Probably the Writer on strike and Bay write the script/lame joke himself. laugh.gif
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 08:36 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(QuickFire @ Jul 14 2009, 05:54 PM)
walao eh the "discussion" is still raging on ah?
I dont believe that is what the phrase meant at all.
*
I also a bit confuse why he said that. Anyhow, I hope he learn a lesson. To be impartial in rating a film. Not just be a fanboy.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 09:02 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(Makakeke @ Jul 14 2009, 08:48 PM)
Oh man, cmon. Stop being a pain in this thread.
*
We talk like a gentleman. Never be a pain my man.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 09:19 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(karasawamk2 @ Jul 14 2009, 09:12 PM)
Bump.. Metroplex

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
DOes not look like Bayformers also. You phailed!
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 09:25 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(karasawamk2 @ Jul 14 2009, 09:23 PM)
ummmm... i just the IDW TF dude not bayformers or direct to u... doh.gif
*
I only sanction TF2 Bayformers. Non-Bayformers seems to be awkward in this thread. Don't you think so?
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 09:32 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(karasawamk2 @ Jul 14 2009, 09:30 PM)
Maybe yes or maybe no. i dunno...  wink.gif

If u feel awkward, sorry i can't do anything...  wink.gif
*
A bit awkward la. Dun post la. TQ.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 14 2009, 09:37 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(karasawamk2 @ Jul 14 2009, 09:33 PM)
I feel post when i like bro... brows.gif
*
ok la...hehe.... so got any Bayformers pic? I wanna see some TF3 bayformers that being leaked.
SUSgogo2
post Jul 15 2009, 02:30 PM

gogo2
********
All Stars
18,672 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(NasiLemakMan @ Jul 15 2009, 02:25 AM)
Just watched V for Vendetta again. After finding some info, the Wachowskis Bro were the writers. This just made me to salivate the prospect.... hoping for the Wachowskis Bros to take helm for this Transformers franchise. They're just so talented, successfully adapting an Alan Moore's GN to the big screen so well. One heck of a job to do.
*
Wachowskis is my idol ever since I watch Matrix. Yes, I think they'll do one hell of a job. First is to get rid of lame joke.


5 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0409sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 08:49 PM