Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V26!, The Orange Legion

views
     
achew
post May 24 2009, 02:15 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


i'll take constant F for event anytime...it gives u greater flexibility control to get wad u wan...not to mention that during those event..its always messy...so i think it'd b good if u can seperate out the main sub from the messy background thru a lil bit bokeh..

just my 2cents tho...i have not much exp on covering any event...nor having a constant aperture zoom lens..lol
achew
post May 24 2009, 02:28 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(ryzan76 @ May 24 2009, 01:57 PM)
where can find this book ah ...Scott Kelby's The Adobe Photoshop CS4 Book for Digital Photographers  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif
*
i think those online tutorial is good enough biggrin.gif
achew
post May 24 2009, 05:35 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(wingster @ May 24 2009, 02:39 PM)
Guys I'm newbie on Sony A350 .... since the day I brought it with the SH0006 18-70mm lens ....

I'm always do bad picture when goes to flashing lights .... is there any very easy trick to control the flash light .... or a flash gun necessary?

Likewise, if I wanna purchase a flash gun ...which flash gun is recommended for newbie >.< ...
*
u might wanna show us how 'bad' is ur bad then we'd have a better idea to tell u how to solve it??

not a big fan of built-in flash..i either use a flash gun..or don use any flash at all tongue.gif
achew
post May 24 2009, 08:46 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(dingenius3 @ May 24 2009, 08:29 PM)
OH MY GOD!! whole these while... i never noticed that at our SAL1870 kitlens actually stated "MACRO" word on it..  sweat.gif  sweat.gif  rolleyes.gif

*
huh..thats a shocking news to me too..lol sweat.gif
achew
post May 24 2009, 09:19 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(braindead_fr3ak @ May 24 2009, 08:51 PM)

when u say 17-70 f2.8...... means is it for full frame or do we hv to convert for alpha aps-c?


Added on May 24, 2009, 8:52 pmi mean ...does it mean aps-c or as full frame  when they say 17-70...?
*
cz2470?? wink.gif

QUOTE(creepydslr @ May 24 2009, 08:55 PM)
what the....u guy didnt notice??OMG!!
never underestimated our kitlens yo...
*
even i know it..i still don believe..lol..i tried b4...and the 'macro'..err.. whistling.gif
achew
post May 24 2009, 10:44 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(weigie @ May 24 2009, 10:31 PM)
i found that the photo that i took was unsharp. after convert to jpeg.. it still the same. any idea can teach me?
the photo was taken during my company D&D
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

The photo was blur because of i did not using the flash?

DSLR-A300
F stop: F11
exposure:0.8sec
ISO: 800
Flash: no flash
*
i guess the rest of the guys had answered ur question... =)

wad lens r u using?if u r using kitlens..shd hav use F5.6(i suppose u zoom a lil)..if the shutter is good enough..perhaps can reduce to iso400...

and if the photo is unsharp in RAW...it wont heal like a miracle when u convert to jpeg...u'll get wad u see in RAW..if u wanna do something..u had to do it when u were in RAW..and convert the final product to jpeg when u finish editing..

This post has been edited by achew: May 24 2009, 10:46 PM
achew
post May 24 2009, 10:51 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(shootkk @ May 24 2009, 10:49 PM)
ISO 800 is fine! Just try overexposing your pic a little and you can hardly see the noise. Don't pixel peep lar! 4R and even 8R printouts at ISO 800 will also not show noise so don't be afraid to use ISO 800. I use ISO 800 even on my A100!!
*
i mean IF possible ma...if the shutter is at decent speed..i don see a reason to use high iso...

This post has been edited by achew: May 24 2009, 10:51 PM
achew
post May 24 2009, 10:56 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(Banzai_san @ May 24 2009, 10:52 PM)
the "ribbon" on her chest looks sharp...  smile.gif
maybe due to the slow shutter speed, she moved her upper body (ie hands, face/head) when you shot her .. thus the blur.
But her lower / chest didnot move. Hence sharp  hmm.gif
*
i think this is less possible bcoz F11 the DoF shd b quite deep..just a lil bit of slight move shd b stil within the focus range...shd b more likely due to the 0.8s shutter..
achew
post May 24 2009, 11:00 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(Banzai_san @ May 24 2009, 10:58 PM)
ehem ...  whistling.gif  shakehead.gif

but for appeture = 11, whole body should be sharp... me thinks
unless if the person had not been sitting still.. ie moving.
*
ohh..sorry..haha..misunderstood ur post...kinda tired tonite tongue.gif
achew
post May 24 2009, 11:01 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(cjlai @ May 24 2009, 11:00 PM)
DOF won't help if the hand or the face moved within that 0.8s biggrin.gif
*
nono..i misunderstood the post just now..i tot he meant that the girl moved back a lil..thus its out of the focus range and thats y its blurred..
achew
post May 24 2009, 11:34 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(weigie @ May 24 2009, 11:18 PM)
i think i use the wrong aperture.. due to previous photo was group photo and i forget to change the aperture to lower.. that might the mistake from me..

really need sifu to teach me how to fully use the camera..
*achew, any tt in sg? lolz
*
haha...im not good enough to teach anything...but available for TT/outing most of the time if u don mind =)
achew
post May 25 2009, 12:07 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


so the camera would choose F11 if im on 1/30s and 18mm??hmmm...but to me 1/30 is stil quite slow..lol =p
achew
post May 25 2009, 02:15 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(albnok @ May 25 2009, 02:07 AM)
There are benefits of using P mode.

For example, you're in a dark place so you use Aperture Priority, ISO1600, F1.4.

The next day while driving you see an interesting scene, maybe a plane flying against the rising sun, while stopped at the red light. You quickly take the camera out of the bag and grab a shot. It will probably be overexposed!

I have shot landscapes and architecture at F11, walking about in sunny KL. Then later at night while crossing a flyover, I take out my camera to take a picture of some VIP getting police escort (from above). I had my 50mm so I assumed there would be no problem... until I clicked and it went click-WHIRRRRRRRRRR-click.* Very slow shutter speed, because I forgot to set it back to F1.4 when I put the camera back in the bag!

Obviously, the moment was gone.

WHIRRRRRR = SteadyShot sound
*
haha..i had that experience b4~ tongue.gif after 2 incidents..i guess i've learnt my lesson..i'd always take a quick glance on my aperture/shutter b4 i shoot anything...


normally..i would use A...sometimes S....and when im playing with my flash most of the time i'd play around with M to achieve wad i had in my mind biggrin.gif


Added on May 25, 2009, 2:16 am
QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ May 25 2009, 02:07 AM)
yalor...the common saying...'use manual la then u r pro'...

ooo didnt notice tht until u tell me. laugh.gif  So P is like Auto but enables you to change a little bit on the shutter/Aperture right? Will try shoot using P...

whirrrr? more like bzzz--nnggzzzz--crrr  biggrin.gif damn i miss tht sound... oh yea btw..Albert, if i have 2 lenses..let say 2470 f2.8 and 70200 f2.8. I shoot at 70F2.8 on both lenses. Theoretically, the bokeh should be the same right?
*
i think depends on the aperture blades too??the DoF shd b the same(i think)..but bokeh shd b diff from lens to lens(not sure its bcoz of the arrangement of the glass inside or the coating)...

This post has been edited by achew: May 25 2009, 02:17 AM
achew
post May 25 2009, 02:37 AM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


sometimes i find M mode pretty fun to play along with flash...had alot of 'fun' playing with it when i take all the 'bokeh-shots' recently...

to me it was a challenge to find the right combination to achieve wad i wan...and can play with aperture..shutter..iso..flash power....distance btwn flash& my subject..etc etc...
achew
post May 25 2009, 01:01 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(Seng_Kiat @ May 25 2009, 10:20 AM)
Hi buddy,

Morning. I am bored early morning today, so, i found something to shoot in front of my house:

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

as usual, C&C are much much appreciated. Thank you guys. wink.gif.
*
haha..same flower

user posted image
achew
post May 25 2009, 01:11 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(kysham @ May 25 2009, 01:04 PM)
Sony A500 & A550 rumours are heating up! I think these models will be ones that the A200/300/350 users should be looking at for a body upgrade to the next level! rclxms.gif

link: http://www.dyxum.com/dforum/a500-a550_topic47003.html

p/s: no photos in the link. just a mention of Sony Canada's website that had leaked out the model name A500 & A550 in their camera models drop down menu. (ops....)
*
but the numbering sounds weird..doesnt really sounds like a700 replacement...lol..
achew
post May 25 2009, 01:34 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(soulfly @ May 25 2009, 01:30 PM)
true replacement for A100 brows.gif
*
thatz my guess too...lol...but if thats the case..it probably wouldnt use cmos sensor??otherwise wads the point of buying 330/380?


Added on May 25, 2009, 1:36 pm
QUOTE(albnok @ May 25 2009, 01:34 PM)
djpianz, you would have to get a shutter release cable (either wired or wireless.) Sony sells the RM-S1AM and RM-L1AM but there are cheaper China-made ones out there:

Wireless:
http://www.lelong.com.my/Auc/List/2009-05D...-Minolta-7D.htm

Wired:
http://www.lelong.com.my/Auc/List/2009-06D...D-7D-Camera.htm

Unfortunately there isn't a way to wirelessly roll the dial. sad.gif I guess, a heavy tripod is in order.
*
i think if the tripod is sturdy enuf..and just press it gently/carefully...it shd b any shift right..or rather..very negligible shift...

This post has been edited by achew: May 25 2009, 01:36 PM
achew
post May 25 2009, 01:57 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(soulfly @ May 25 2009, 01:38 PM)
You can imagine it this way
A2xx/A3xx are actually a standard lower than the first A100, which seems to be a premium entry level DSLR.
A500 replacing A100 with improved performance isn't so weird even in marketing strategy speaking. It's just a naming scheme.

back then it was like this...
A100 vs D80

so it wouldn't be a surprise if...
A500 vs D90

tongue.gif
*
hopefully thats the case..heheh..but stil..i do hope they come out with a700 replacement sooner =p
achew
post May 25 2009, 05:38 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(epito @ May 25 2009, 02:11 PM)
im using 50mm 1.4
what is the best setting for potrait using A mode + ISO?
*
there is no "best setting" or mode....setting has to be changed accordingly to diff occasion..and diff output that the photographer wanted...
achew
post May 25 2009, 05:54 PM

Photolithography Engineer
*******
Senior Member
3,807 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Masking


QUOTE(nabelon @ May 25 2009, 05:40 PM)
guys,

35-70 f4 seems cheap, how good is the optics compared to the kit ?

thanks
*
optically i think it shd b better..not to mention that it has constant aperture...but as wad spooky said..the range doesnt really sounds good on apsc..

just my 2cents worth

7 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0222sec    0.46    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 10:48 AM