which giottos? would cost me a bundle la kan?

u use 40D? how much is it?

This post has been edited by alpha_company: May 19 2009, 09:16 PM

by that i think u meant AMOLED display technology..from what i've read it would give a true black on an lcd right?

BTW, searching for a tripod that is not is around rm500 and below (including head) that can REMOVE & FLIP the middle part/centre column downwards so that can take pics 180 deg..camera facing down completely. dont want a rm700+ tripod..& i dont think i need a tripod that can handle 7kg+ anytime soon.

5za9 recommended this..

MANFROTTO
GIOTTOS
BOTH do not have ballhead RIGHT?

ryzan76 recommended this but pricey la..
giottos.....mtl9351b.....700 plus ball head.....

what's the best i can get for my money (around rm500 below) than can do THIS at 8:05

This post has been edited by alpha_company: May 20 2009, 07:57 AM

what is downside of the new a200/a300/a350 replacement?

what are u talking about?

where2? wanna see pic..

ya loh...the same happened to me too

any significant improvements over the old a200/a300/a350?

benro giottos and manfrotto.. build quality which is better?

benro ex300 with what head and how much is it? does benro have a tripod that has a removable centre column and a centre column that can be turned horizontally.

This post has been edited by alpha_company: May 23 2009, 01:14 PM

guys.. i have a tammy 17-50 f2.8... is it worth it to sell my lens and get a nikon 18-200 VRII or tammy 18-270 VC?

OR just add a 70-300 lens? (tammy/sigma 70-300 OR 70-300 VRii)

i just started doin wedding pics...and would also like to do outdoor/candid/sports pics...

what should i do?

thanks AlphaBeta, achew & creepydslr ... mixed opinions..

btw, what is mtf value for lenses? higher MTF = higher IQ right? 17-50 has a higher MTF than 18-200. a bad thing about 18-200 is that it has no zoom lock unlike the tammy..

from what i read HERE price:performance, 18-200 is a bad choice..for that price better get 18-270 tammy, but i cant find any 2nd hand 18-270..

i think i'll keep my tammy 1750

thanks again..

This post has been edited by alpha_company: May 24 2009, 03:22 AM

yup..18270 & 18200VR IQ is quite the same, the price also the same, so 18270 ftw because longer range...

just thinking only..hehehehe

oh...i donno about that.. baru tau.. a definite plus for 18200 lar..

might also consider adding 70-300VRii...murah a bit.. but still need to keep my tammy 1750

This post has been edited by alpha_company: May 24 2009, 12:18 PM

geram ar tgk u punya pics.. gatal want to buy macro la pulak

---

Added on May 26, 2009, 12:25 am

waaa...dia pakai that jamban flash diffuser ka?

---

Added on May 26, 2009, 12:33 amwaaa..very sharp..what aperture, shutter and iso? use flash right?

This post has been edited by alpha_company: May 26 2009, 12:33 AM

18-250 IQ ok or terrible compared to your kitlens?

nice lens.. i like the mfd.. before this choosing between this lens and tammy 1750.. end up buying the tammy

btw, guys, the new tamron 18-270mm is not out yet for sony mount?

if like this i also got one lar..hehe

here it is...my CZ lens...hehehehe

today so slow ar the thread..