Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Money vs Marriage, Money ruin everything...

views
     
SUSSPS
post May 11 2009, 08:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(moorish @ May 11 2009, 08:20 PM)
sorry to hear of your problem, but if you guys are chinese then I agree it is your responsibility on the wedding bill, if you want the girls side to pay then marry a eurasian tongue.gif

Dowry 3k considered cheap

Photoshoot 2k considered cheap

wedding dinner 5k also considered cheap, and as mention you can ROI on this the same night, if lucky you may even make money

Conclusion, dont complaint, your future wife considered very very kind to you.
*
Kindness? I beg to differ. When it comes to spousal matters, you don't know what that word means.
SUSSPS
post May 11 2009, 08:30 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(ezralimm @ May 11 2009, 08:26 PM)
sorry, pls elaborate.

lost in england.

spousal matters?
*
http://www.answers.com/topic/spousal
SUSSPS
post May 11 2009, 08:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(ezralimm @ May 11 2009, 08:32 PM)
nonono... i know what the word means.

But in relation to what moorish said:

she said she thinks TS' spouse is kind..

so you're being sarcastic? Or are you agreeing with her?  rclxub.gif
*
Sarcasm.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 09:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(moorish @ May 11 2009, 11:19 PM)
Obviously someone very insensitive to girls dream
Obviously someone without a gf
thank you, after reading your post you made me really really appreciate my husband
*
Lay off the personal insults if you have nothing better to say. Not everyone subscribes to your gold-digging ways.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 10:05 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(moorish @ May 12 2009, 09:15 AM)
Dont say like that la, you try to look at things on the parents side, they're handing their daughter to you, means she will be the boys family side, the grandson all follow the boys surname. And its only respectful that you at least compensate back something and this for 2000 years ago has been practice the boy pays the in laws money/gold.



Added on May 12, 2009, 9:17 am

*
F1meteor stated that he would not go into debt to host a lavish wedding dinner and here you are encouraging just the opposite? I don't mean to be presumptuous but in your mind's eye, jumping into a debt hole is fine and dandy as long as the woman is pleased (at least for like-minded women like you).

Funny how some people like to selectively adopt "traditions" in their lives as long as it's advantageous to them.


SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 10:09 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(moorish @ May 12 2009, 09:57 AM)
its not personal insult, personal insult would be like named calling moron or stupid or etc..... I'm saying very insensitive to girls feeling, btw you just insulted me about gold-digging without any prove...go read my thread and comment again, it is either you didnt read the whole thing and simply tembak or you dont understand english. doh.gif
*
Re-read your own postings. Postulating a person's relationship status (i.e. implying that no girl wants him as a bf) and manhood soley due to a single posting are insults.

It may be insensitive to you but certainly not to a whole lot of level-headed women out there.

I do not need to read your entire thread - the first posting itself paints a glittering (pun intended) picture of your gold-digging persona. Looks like you do not even realize what you are writing and posting.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 10:25 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(moorish @ May 12 2009, 10:11 AM)
I think you better learn to read properly b4 you reply, I said he was disrespectful to the parents, notthing mention about the wedding, he can have mamak-stall teh tarik/roti reception for all I care, but saying the parents asking 3k is outrages? I think he and you is the one unclear of the concept.

BTW why you think bank offer loans for wedding?
Because they know people make money from it if plan wisely.


Added on May 12, 2009, 10:13 am

Wah...then your comment is not worth for anyone to read..
Its like reading 5% of a book and conclude the storyline....
*
It's best for F1meteor to respond to your query but I have extracted and re-posted his comments here for the sake of clarity:

in laws asking for money? that is outrages. i would give the amount that i can afford to. they are not selling their daughter, why are they setting up a price?
ang paus is for the good luck and chinese customs. the amount is entirely not important. but not to that extent of giving just RM10...

if my future wife wants a GRAND wedding, she has to be prepared to help me... i'm not a millionaire.. i think my gf understand me well about this
i don't mind spending for my future wedding, but it has to be within my affordability. taking loan for my wedding is a big NO.


The gist of it is that he stated he would fund a wedding dinner but not to the extent of getting into debt. It may be an insult to YOU but certainly not to a lot of folks.

Personal loans are offered for weddings, jewelry, vacations, etc because they know there are suckers out there who plunge head over heels in debt just to please some manipulative women. A bank exists to make money and not a guilt compass if that is what you are alluding to.

An internet forum thread is not a book, a posting or two will reveal what the forummer is attempting to postulate - in your case, it's plain vanilla simple => your mantra is basically "what yours is mine and what's mine is mine" in a marital relationship.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 01:49 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(moorish @ May 12 2009, 01:41 PM)
How many times must repeat this wan ha? I think these kinda remarks are used to scare girls to think this way, but in reality, dun just think this apply to rich guys la, open your eyes and look outside in the real world. Financial standing has nothing to do with itchy guys.

Poor and Rich flirt equally.
*
In modern society, a man cannot have mistresses unless he can afford to do so.

Hence, more money equates to a higher ability to be promiscuous.


Added on May 12, 2009, 1:53 pm
QUOTE(cracksys @ May 12 2009, 01:44 PM)
unfortunately, some pre-historic girls think that sharing is a sin.
*
Actually, it's being selectively prehistoric.

Some women wish to have their independence and all that yet insist on men waiting on them hand and foot.

A mixture of neanderthal and modern cro-magnon rolled into one. Greedy Eastern materialism paired with Western liberalism.

This post has been edited by SPS: May 12 2009, 01:53 PM
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 02:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
Good parents educate their children to be INDEPENDENT and not to be bloodsucking leeches. Education has been a vital instrument in liberating and opening new doors to women and here we have one or two deluded souls who insist that a woman's purpose in getting married is to secure a pot of gold.

Seriously, it's a slap in the face to all the modern women out there.





SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 02:19 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Gr3yL3gion @ May 12 2009, 02:13 PM)
You're harsh, it is women's right to be a bloodsucking leeches you know. After all girls leak blood every month and it's painful.
*
Crude joke but I can give a chuckle to it.

To me, they are playing the classic game of self-perceived victimization akin to how some UMNOputras claim their ketuanan rights solely of their skin colour.

Both of them blame others for their imaginary "plight" and demand for special rights and privileges to correct it.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 02:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(monashguy @ May 12 2009, 02:30 PM)
I will add 5 cents here, first 12k for wedding is not expensive, I don't understand people here, why married when you cannot afford it, I am a guy and I actually support girls looking for husbands who can support them, sure wife must understanding and all sorts, but based on research, women likes security and the fact is that RM12k is not a lot for wedding so the wife/gf is not willing to chip in is understandable, do you ever think from women's point of view. Research or studies have shown that women actually have planned their wedding since they are 5 years old. They have been thinking and thinking and planning up to the time of adulthood. You said couple give and take?? This a a fair way, man pays all, children follows guy's family name, if wife pays some, would you also give and take and some children follow the wife name and also your name follow the wife name?? Everything has it's price, women follow husbands name, children follow husband name and wife has to give birth and look after the children, the least a man can do is pay for the wedding!! I always tell people this, if you cannot afford to marry then don't do it, wait till financial ok, it is downright selfish. I am not a hyprocrite, my financial is not at the right way yet so I don't get married and have gf.  Marriages do go down in unhappyness due to financial and that is a fact.
*
Did you just come up with that preposterous stance that a man paying for a wedding is an exchange for his children taking after his family name?

What a joke!
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 02:44 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(monashguy @ May 12 2009, 02:40 PM)
I didn't say that, but I said man cannot have it everything his way, man wants wife to follow his name and everything else but when comes to money man pay nothing or wants to share. You can't have it both ways, it's a man's responsibility to pay for his wedding. icon_rolleyes.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
You are missing the gist of the debate in this thread.

If a man can well afford to pay for a wedding's expenses by himself and he is okay with that, very good. The point of contention is when a woman insists on her husband providing well and above what he can afford for a wedding and insists it is her right to do so just because she is of female gender. Heck, some forummer here was even promoting bank loans to fund for wedding extravagance solely to please some manipulative woman!

No one's insisting that everything has to be his or her way.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 02:52 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(monashguy @ May 12 2009, 02:30 PM)
Research or studies have shown that women actually have planned their wedding since they are 5 years old. They have been thinking and thinking and planning up to the time of adulthood.
*
Studies have also shown that the male mammalian species such as human beings like to procerate with as many fertile females as they can and spread their genes.

Do you really believe all these crap?
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 02:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(moorish @ May 12 2009, 02:56 PM)
I think in his gfs opinion, 12k is not really a big grand wedding, 12k inc of photo, dowry and reception all in wor, I would say is a very economical wedding lor. His gf is sad that TS took no initiative to even save 12k.

And some of the smartalec here (not you) maybe really expect a roti canai and teh tarik reception doh.gif
*
Is that your problem if some couples have a roti canai reception or even just sign a marriage of certificiate and have no wedding receptions whatsoever?

SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 03:04 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(barista @ May 12 2009, 02:59 PM)
Ehh... what about the number of times TS slept with the future wife?
The girl already lose some value by being with him over the years.

What is 12K? Some more want to complaint here.
*
You are equating love and marriage to the number of times he has humped his fiancee.

To me, that reads like prostitution.

What lunacy....
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 03:11 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(Duke Red @ May 12 2009, 02:57 PM)
Are you disputing the fact that women would have thought out their weddings from an early age? Ok so 5 may be a stretch but at least when they are old enough to understand the concept of being in a relationship. While I do not have studies to back up this claim I can safely say that if one were to conduct a test and ask 10 women, 9 out of the 10 would say they did.

The point is that while most men view weddings as mere a symbolic gesture and something they have to do to appease the family, women see it as a physical manisfestation of marriage. Men are known to forget birthdays, anniversaries and such but do most women? Like it or not we are different by design.

*
Ah yes, fall back to physcological studies, biological, culture, tradition or whatever to justify spending beyond one's means on a single event.

It makes as much sense as saying men should sow their seeds with as many fertile women as possible because it's hard-coded in their DNA.

Ever heard of personal choice?

SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 03:12 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(barista @ May 12 2009, 03:10 PM)
Because TS is being calculative first.
If you love your girl, you will give her the best and don't complaint.
*
What does that have to do with how many times he humped (or not) his fiancee?

You are off your rocker!
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 03:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(barista @ May 12 2009, 03:17 PM)
It's just a figure of speech duh.
A girl who had devoted herself to you deserves more.

If TS tells us he is a guy who always buy her stuff, treat her to nice dinner, holidays... a reasonable girl will not mind him spending less on or chip in for a wedding.

Sometimes a girl can only be a princess once in her lifetime you know? Naturally she looks forward to it.
*
The point here is affordability and the woman's compromise on that matter if he or both of them cannot afford the extravagance.

Love and marriage is not racked up by how many dinner or holidays he or she buy for each other. Such shallowness have no place in a good marriage and it's perfectly obvious you do not know what one is.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 03:29 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(n00b13 @ May 12 2009, 03:22 PM)
It's been my experience that Malaysians tend to present their opinions with the justification that "people are like that", "men/women are like that", "that's the norm in society", etc. That says a lot about their mentality. Not only are they conformists, they're shirking personal responsibility for their own views.

If you're a money-minded person who thinks money is more important than love, admit that you're a money-minded person who thinks money is more important than love. That's your opinion, your point of view, your outlook on life. Don't try to say "everyone is like that", as if this "everyone" is some dialectic shield that protects you from people challenging your views. If people challenge your views, defend them - and if you can't defend them, you might just have to reconsider them.
*
The "norm in society" stance is only trumpeted by these so-called conformists when it is to their advantage.

One could state that it is a "norm" for wealthy men to have mistresses and one will hear a huge earful from these very same conformists.
SUSSPS
post May 12 2009, 03:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,127 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
QUOTE(monashguy @ May 12 2009, 03:25 PM)


Added on May 12, 2009, 3:26 pmNot to mention if you bring back the girl to Malaysia,  the living expenses is back in Malaysia and it's square one, can't afford to pay for wedding, you surely cannot afford to maintain her.

*
A wife is not chattel to be maintained.

What the heck is maintenance in this modern age?



3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0251sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 09:40 AM