QUOTE(Knight_2008 @ Oct 18 2020, 09:20 PM)
No 1 is already unacceptable. What great insights / confidential document does TTB think his company has?
Even in places like goldman sachs, JP Morgan etc where the investment bankers / investment managers / traders have much more confidential information / data and are true global market movers, these companies did not ban personal mobile phones from their premises. Capital Dynamic's reason for this sounds like a load of bull shit to get the staff to work without any regards to outside world during working hours.
No 1. is actually just damn weird. I've worked in regulated industries before (previous employer's HQ building was actually classified as a potential terrorist target by the government). What's the norm to be enforced is a second mobile device only for work purposes, and no access to work related stuff from personal devices.Even in places like goldman sachs, JP Morgan etc where the investment bankers / investment managers / traders have much more confidential information / data and are true global market movers, these companies did not ban personal mobile phones from their premises. Capital Dynamic's reason for this sounds like a load of bull shit to get the staff to work without any regards to outside world during working hours.
Oct 20 2020, 04:33 PM

Quote
0.0189sec
0.37
6 queries
GZIP Disabled