Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Travel MAS (Malaysia Airline System), Discussion, Q&A, and others

views
     
lizardjeremy
post Apr 15 2013, 03:04 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
i find this requirement a nuisance,the cc companies exercised stringent measures to ensure that all cc users are thoroughly 'screened' and authenticated be4 approvals
why must MAS imposed such measures to the detriment of passengers?
lizardjeremy
post Apr 15 2013, 06:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Apr 2013

Moderator-assuming the existing procedures are to prevent online fraud or ? Would mas or the other airlines be affected by the forgery or fraud?put it simply would mas not have collected the monies from the cc?afterall mas is just a carrier and there's no ground for them to deny the registered party from travelling if the passengers name tally with their official documents and the ticket is already paid for


lizardjeremy
post Apr 16 2013, 10:37 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(hye @ Apr 15 2013, 08:44 PM)
You are open to your own opinions and views. Whatever it is I speak from my own personal experience, it'll beat speculations and assumptions anytime of the day.
If you have your own which contradicts (good or bad) then you are free to share it here.
*
its neither an opinion nor a statement admonshing the airlines for their customer unfriendly or downright nonsensical arrangement that makes a mockery of the cc companies stringent procedure introduce to stem fraud
international online cc frauds are not confined to malaysia only,the airline can joined the cc company to fight this scourge at source but cursory inspection of those documents ie cc at check in counters is not going to contribute to reducing this kind of criminal activity rolleyes.gif

perhaps thats the reason its not a uniform requirement with other premier airlines SIA/Cx etc
lizardjeremy
post Apr 16 2013, 03:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(b00n @ Apr 16 2013, 02:11 PM)
From SIA FAQ in regards to SQ Mobile Booking:
From SIA FAQ in regards to Letter of Indemnity (LOI)

However they gave a waiver provided online verification on the card transaction had been done by "SecureCode"
Cathay FAQ: http://www.cathaypacific.com/cpa/en_INTL/f...ketpurchase/pay
Anyway, so far I have not encountered any of this when I travel with MAS, AA, Cathay nor JAL. But they do reserve the rights not to admit entry if one fails to comply. FYI, I use to buy ticket for my wife and daughter or my wife buys for me or her parents (her parents does not have credit cards); and cross fingers no issue thus far.
*
thanks for the information which literally means all airlines have this obnoxious universal clause of not allowing bonafide travellers to board in the event that they are dissatisfied with the cc issue
my contention is- why introduce onerous condition when the online transaction is already approved by the banks unless any fraud detected thereafter will lead to non payment to the airlines concerned

my assertion/understanding that any transaction online or otherwise is deemed completed after been approved by the appropiate authorities is perhaps wrong and flawed to the core !!!!!
lizardjeremy
post Apr 16 2013, 04:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(hye @ Apr 16 2013, 04:16 PM)
Thanks boon
On a lighter note, if he's that deeply opinionated and well experienced (read his posts in other forums) about the subject - start his own airline and make the difference that he is advocating. Being glib on the tongue just wouldn't cut it, would it be ?  thumbup.gif
*
well if i m capable of starting an airline i wont be venting nuisance or spewing venom for your consumption here-mr smart alec

This post has been edited by lizardjeremy: Apr 16 2013, 04:35 PM
lizardjeremy
post Apr 16 2013, 04:40 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
35 posts

Joined: Apr 2013
QUOTE(hye @ Apr 16 2013, 04:16 PM)
Thanks boon
On a lighter note, if he's that deeply opinionated and well experienced (read his posts in other forums) about the subject - start his own airline and make the difference that he is advocating. Being glib on the tongue just wouldn't cut it, would it be ?  thumbup.gif
*
well mr smart alec -the entire discourse was on why introduce extra measures to contain or deter cc fraud which inconvenienced customers .more resources should have been directed to tackle potential frauds at source and not at the airline checkin counters.

maybe you should start your own fraud detecting firm at the airport instead

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0309sec    0.45    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 06:44 PM