QUOTE(NoiZy @ Apr 17 2009, 12:26 AM)
Bout 2years ago, Cyberia Condominium type-C cost RM1000+- per unit. Now it cost about RM1200+-, and type-C is the smallest among all, this is for the apartments la, if town/smart house I don't really know la.. I think thats why its more expensive, RM1200 divide by 3rooms, so its bout that price la. Normally when you call agent such as the bi$%h Cindy, they will offer you type-A first, that one cost bout 1600+- I think, not so sure. But also 3rooms, but bigger la.
My advice, either get a bunch of friends and book the town/smart house, or inquire about type-C units. If possible, get a unit in Seri Kembangan, Equine Park, or Serdang, it's a lot cheaper, got lots more food, better and cheaper food (cheaper you need to know where to find la), but then again, you need to travel (waste time and petrol + maintenance money). Add back, more or less the same price but with either good food or a place you can go back to when you have few hours break.
And bear in mind bout the travelling if you like to join activities
I could not comment much on this part but I can only get contacts if anyone wish to get it. Sorry.
Added on April 17, 2009, 1:11 amQUOTE(sexualpower @ Apr 13 2009, 09:52 PM)
pls bring me to meet them, so that I can bring another piece of evidence to the present SRC blog, which has represented the students and helped to bring info by meeting with the Dean of FET and still couldn't get the facts across~ so yes, i'd like to meet the lecturers~ i'll be awaiting your PM on contact details, tq~
Sorry but I have found proof that KPI does exist.
KPI comes in different versions and verities. Almost all the management and lecturers have the KPI system. Lecturers will be evaluated by the "Online Evaluation" system and will be done as well based on the lecturer's research (something like student's assignment) but is monitored by the Dean. The Dean will evaluate the lecturers based on a few things or requirement. Online evaluation is one of them. And now, Online Evaluation's way have been changed it's approach. Results of it shall only be attainable after the final and supplementary exam's results are revealed.
However, supplementary exam's approach has been altered as if student were to fail, they can only take supplementary exam on the following semester. Lecturers who gainned low marks for their online evaluation will be questioned by the Dean. The Dean will be the one to determine which lecturer should be sent for courses and etc. Poor KPI of lecturers will affect their pay rate and jeopardize their position. They will take a very long time to be promoted (unless proven qualified).
Evaluation in terms of exams would be done by Exam Unit and external auditor from other universities to minimise errors and flaws. Other managements (even the cleaners) have this KPI system! The black and white exists but it is confidential (for professionalism). Currently, the university is just educating students to express their rights by Online Evaluation and still do not understand why such thing should be revealed? Are where here to study or what? And although the main goal is to study, other parts (includes this KPI), I do not think is necessary. No offence, but simple thing such as Online Evaluation is not even being practiced. Who cares about KPI? If more and more students knows about this KPI. Then what? Students can talk down the lecturers using this method to blackmail them?
This post has been edited by gavinfernando: Apr 17 2009, 01:11 AM 
Apr 14 2009, 01:02 PM
Quote
oh my... very proud to be MMU student LOL!!!!!
... What happened to their service center/telecom? I have try every single contact number they given at website... Weird~
... Whats happening o?
0.0451sec
0.34
7 queries
GZIP Disabled