Mar 30 2009, 08:46 PM
Caveman age, where the women took care of the babies, they will choose among the strongest man. Correct.
And a few centuries ago, a lot of women are still illiterate, stays at home and still mothers the man's child. They don't mind if their husband is polygamous, the more wives, the richer, the prouder, the stronger. Correct.
And now, this era, come on, woman, you still need to leech on a rich man in order to survive? In order to be happy? In order to be proud?
We have the right to fight for monogamous relationship. We have the right to earn our own cash. Do you still think woman should not work, and just taking what the man brought home? And be happy if the man brought home a loooot of money.
I don't think I can be proud, if my husband is filthy rich but doesn't loves me or treat me accordingly, or the other way round.
I don't think wealth can guarantee happiness.
Added on March 30, 2009, 8:52 pm
QUOTE(parsona @ Mar 29 2009, 10:55 PM)
You're not understanding me. I'm the type that believes in equality in all, be it race or gender, hence I do not believe that women should be treated like a sex object or as a cook. I'm saying that for those women who choose men based on how rich they are, these women do not deserve gender equality, instead they should be treated like how women were treated thousands of years ago. They should shut up when men are talking, obey when men want sex, and cook when men are hungry.
I did tell this to my gf, and she agrees with me. I treat her as an equal and I expect to be treated the same.
So go on ahead an be proud of choosing a guy based on his cash, but don't you dare complain when he cheats on you with younger sexier girls or when he demands that you shut up and cook.
Women have come a long way from your example of 'thousands of years ago'. Your suggestion of being proud to choose a man based on how rich they are has just set womenkind back a few decades. If I were a woman, I'd hate you.
I couldn't agree more. I did tell this to my gf, and she agrees with me. I treat her as an equal and I expect to be treated the same.
So go on ahead an be proud of choosing a guy based on his cash, but don't you dare complain when he cheats on you with younger sexier girls or when he demands that you shut up and cook.
Women have come a long way from your example of 'thousands of years ago'. Your suggestion of being proud to choose a man based on how rich they are has just set womenkind back a few decades. If I were a woman, I'd hate you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I back-read a few previous debate here and somewhere in between, I read that Moorish stressed on financial stability. Yes, that's very very important.
But what I do not agree is your first post
"So girls, be proud when you choose a rich husband, and to those girl who insist love is more important, they're just immature and the mother instinct not kick in yet, after few years of marriage they'll regret of their choice."
I still insist love is more important. Love can sail the boat a loong loooong way. Yes, of course, money are important but still wealth doesn't guarantee happiness.
This post has been edited by Kii: Mar 30 2009, 09:10 PM
Quote
0.0164sec
0.44
7 queries
GZIP Disabled