That's good. So Shanghai men have no testicles to speak of and will do anything for *****?

I will enjoy punking them too, just because they're such sissy little b****es.

And the men, the most pathetic?

Haiz, knock on his door, then give him a hug, comfort him and share a beer mah. Lei chan hai mmm sek chow.

---

Added on May 13, 2009, 11:50 pmEar plugs.

---

Added on May 13, 2009, 11:51 pm my head spins at the thought.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: May 13 2009, 11:51 PM

This is very dangerous. I could collect all my chi energies to FALCON PUNCH them in the collective nuts, only to discover that they have absolutely no test.icles.

Thus my life sacrifice would be in vain and the new Captain Falcon would be facing an enemy he is not prepared to face, a foe so deadly that it vanquished his predecessor and not the other way around.

---

Added on May 13, 2009, 11:54 pmDid you also know that women choose guys who can give them good sperm?

Is also animal instinct. Heehee

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: May 13 2009, 11:55 PM

I can't read the Chinese characters you included in your post, but I seriously hope you do not consider such things to be "normal".

Well, in countries and societies where women no longer need to rely on men for financial support, men are used and abused with disturbing regularity.

Being ONLY a provider is a fool's game, but it is sad that this type of thinking is so prevalent in mainstream Chinese culture.

It is not enough to be a provider, and it is not complete.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Jun 28 2009, 03:39 AM

Worse, actually. A lot of men have been totally and utterly DESTROYED by inhumane divorce and "family" laws that make no sense.

Sorry, can't understand what you're trying to say.

Being money minded is a sign of a mentally defeated and colonised Chinese.

They have been so mentally enslaved that not only can they not see the value of community and humanity, they also cannot (or do not want to) understand the true workings of power and how it affects the human world, reserving that privilege for the people they call their masters.

So in the end these human beings end up living lives entirely serving the purposes of others. They make huge sums of money but it is more than they know what to do with. And the money the make goes to others to enrich them.

When you hear statements like these, that only the worst examples of individuals actually represent an ENTIRE GROUP of diverse people, you know that what you're dealing with is prejudice and stereotype.

"Bad boys" can no more give men a bad name than William Hung can represent Chinese.

There are plenty of good men around. If they are INVISIBLE and thus irrelevant, then an effort must be made to discover why.

---

Added on September 30, 2009, 1:32 pmROFL!!!

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Sep 30 2009, 01:32 PM

You are wrong about the downfall of Sparta.

I had a look at Sparta's history after hearing about that idiotic propaganda film "300" in which many stupid Malaysians thought highly of.

Contrary to the film, Sparta was the BIGGEST slave owning society in the Mediterranean at the time, and routinely participated in acts of terror called the "krypteia", where Spartans coming of age would go into the wildnerness to stalk, rape and murder the defenceless population of helots that labored for the military class in Sparta.

The Spartans were also rampant homosexuals, as sexual contact with women was forbidden until a man had proved himself. In substitution "pederasty" and homosexual lust was encouraged as an outlet.

Sparta was a militaristic caste society where it's citizens, both men and women were trained from birth for warfare and attrition. In order to distinguish themselves from the helots and other slaves citizenry was based on strict HEREDITARY rules to ensure that Sparta remained firmly in the hands of Spartans themselves.

Did inbreeding and such strict hereditary rules of citizenship cause the downfall of Sparta? Yes, but not in the way that you think.

Simply put: the helot population boomed despite the regular massacres and acts of terror and repression, and even though many uprisings were put down the Spartans found it more and more difficult to manage their slave labor. Where before the use of slaves helped focus the Spartans on playing the game of domination in the Mediterranean, now they were spending more time "handling" the helots themselves even while city states like Athens were growing in power and influence.

As for the Spartan population itself? It stagnated because it was a society closed to outsiders, but their own political base could not grow as fast via births as compared to the others than used a more sophisticated form o politics.

Even so, Spartan power remained military power remained formidable. They had a class of professional, trained, hardnened killers where the other city states struggled to build a full time military and navy.

Spartan mythology prides itself as having never been defeated in battle and having never been invaded and subjugated. The real truth however is nowhere near as glorious.

In the 4th century BC the Boetian League under the leadership of Thebes rose to prominence and challenged Spartan hegemony in the region that had waned following the successful Peloponnesian wars. War was declared. The Spartans marched on the Boetian league and took its field forces by surprise and with numerical superiority. So fearsome was the reputation of Spartan martial skill that the Boetian generals were divided as to whether to contest the field or be driven from it. In the end, the warrior-statesman Epaminondas of Thebes prevailed.

Traditionally, hoplites were arranged in phalanxes twelve men deep, with the best fighters on the right wing. The aim was to engage the enemy simulaneously in a solid, well coordinated spear and shield line and attrite them to the point that their own formations broke down and they were reduced to a rout. The strongest and best fighters were placed on the right wing as this was the best position for them to fight in a phalanx. Against phalanxes of a similar formation the battles would degenerate into the two armies locked in battle with one another but also circling as the stronger right flanks of both armies pushed back the left. To prevail, the phalanxes would have to wheel and preserve formation or rish envelopment. The Spartans were so well trained and drilled that they have never lost a battle.

Epaminondas broke with military tradition and used the principle of concentration of forces in order to counter Spartan military superiority.

He massed his best soldiers FIFTY deep on the LEFT flank to face the Spartan elite that was only twelve deep, and his weaker troops were distributed towards the rightwards side solely to act in a holding action, locking the enemy in combat and preventing easy maneuver and redeployment.

His cavalry was massed behind his left flank as a tactical reserve.

The armies marched on each other and clashed. On the Spartan left the Boetians were pushed back in battle by superior strength and skill.

But on the Spartan right, Sparta's elite staggered against the weight of the men thrown at it. Sparta's phalanx first showed signs of cracking, but because Sparta had no tactical reserve, additional forces could not be added to the battle without being withdrawn from battle elsewhere. In this, the Spartan left were hindered from redeploying by the Boetian right that had been pushed back but were still holding their ground and still giving battle. Perhaps an attempt was made to disengage some forces and remaneuver, but even if this was attempted, it was unsuccessful, or did not reach the critical area in time.

The Spartan line cracked, and then broke. Cavalry poured through to exploit the gap and attack the enemy from the rear, infantry forced the Spartan right back while others streamed through gaps to divide and encircle the Spartans.

The result was a total rout and the complete destruction of half it's army's fighting force, not to mention almost its ENTIRE logistics and supply train, with the lost of materials and supplies.

The Spartans retreated and were UNABLE to replace these combat losses. Thereafter the Spartans were overshadowed not just militarily with it's navy being sidelined, its control over its own helot population waned and the other powers of the Mediterranean took over the power vacuum ensuing from the Spartan retreat and reclusement. Spartan borders shrank and Sparta simply became irrelevant.

When Philip of Macedon became the overlord of Greece Sparta had already become an uninteresting backwater, a little plot of land worth nothing compared to the riches, influence and sheer vitality that the other Greek states possessed.

This was how Sparta avoided total defeat in battle: by the stroke of luck of having the enemy political leadership killed in action, by losing a war and retreating to its own borders, by losing influence and the ability to project force, by slowly fading into obscurity.

I'm afraid not. We've still not yet discovered the genes for many common hereditary diseases.

ROFL!

+1

Nice rebuttal for those who think like that.

ROFL!!!

Plus TEN!

Only stupid Asians will even think of things like this.

Look at idiot Singaporeans. The five C's were the rage back in the 90s. Guess what? Singaporean women expect Singaporean men to have five C's, but they freely sleep with white men who don't meet the requirements.

It's quite obvious what men must do.

We must acknowledge that finances have an indispensable role in our lives. Financial freedom can free you from the rat race, it can broaden your horizons, it increases your social mobility, it promises a better future not just for you but also for your offspring. But we must also acknowledge other things of importance in a man's life. Things such as principles, community, character, individuality, social stature, family... it's a very long list.

As men we must wholly reject the idea that your worth depends entirely upon the money you make or the money we can make. We are worth much more than that. This idea is a mental chain design to wrap around your mind so that you never learn what other qualities and things women also look for.

The result if you follow them would be to become an idiot Singaporean. Most of the men there no matter how highly paid they are live in a highly regimented society and they lack freedom of time and social mobility. Because they believe that only money matters in attracting a mate they are used as providers while being FREELY CUCKOLDED by their own women, who satisfy their other needs and wants with other men whose only pre-requisite is that they are not Singaporean Chinese.

---

Added on October 3, 2009, 4:46 pmAs for the people here actually taking the effort to defend a thread titled "Girls are money minded: be proud of it", I think they need to understand the TRUE meaning of "ada wang ada ahmoi" and hang out more with men who truly live by that saying.

They will learn the difference.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Oct 3 2009, 04:46 PM

If men are evaluated by how much Five C's they have, then women can also be evaluated on how much Five C's their LOOKS deserve.

A lot of women who think they are hot and act hot... are not really that hot.

In addition, women age and lose their looks fast, so a permanent relationship does not make as much sense as a lend-lease one.

Men on the other hand, only grow in stature and power as the years pass, before ill health and death finally takes them.

So the real con game that is being played is by women who are pretending to be very hot in order to milk as much as possible from a chump that actually believes she is worth much more than she actually is. ROFL!

A lot of Malaysian women are idiots. It saddens me. They believe and absorb whatever they are fed by word of mouth or mass media without thinking or reflecting.

Take for example, the large numbers of them "starting out" and playing the stock market. Do they understand how fortunes are really made and lost in a stock market, or even foreign exchange or commodities market, and how the market itself is manipulated? They don't. They are too invested in the idea that the system can be mastered or beaten.

At various times here I have heard it said that diamonds are a "good investment". I've even heard it said somewhere that diamonds are a better "investment" than gold.

GOLD IS NOT AN INVESTMENT. It is meant to function as a medium of exchange, as such, it's prices will be kept stable, and also, because buying gold means betting against the US dollar, it's prices are regularly suppressed and pushed down in order to support the dollar supremacy. Gold is used to combat currency hyper-inflation.

But even then it makes more sense than buying a diamond. You cannot sell or exchange a diamond for even the same amount of money you bought it with. If you buy diamonds at retail price then YOU ARE AN IDIOT.

Please for the love of god don't have sex with such brainless women. Your children might take their intelligence from their mother's side and then they would be morons.

---

Added on October 3, 2009, 5:11 pmOnly Malaysian and Singaporean men do that.

They are afraid and ashamed of their own erections, they cannot or do not understand what attracts women, and they try to buy women using money and free attention.

That's why Malaysian and Singaporean men are notorious for being di.ckless eunuchs to non-Malaysian women.

Don't mistake me, Moorish.

I WANT this thread to get many, many views. I WANT you to spread and propagate this ideology.

I want men to start thinking. Really thinking.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Oct 3 2009, 05:11 PM

Why should I be impressed about Datins and Datuks? Am I a mentally colonized and defeated feudal Chinese?

I see that a lot of Chinese worship things like Datukship and even Prince William, that British guy.

Sun Yat Sen will BIT.CHSLAP you. Emancipation has no meaning to people like these.

I'm not being defensive, I am being offensive.

You are defending Moorish's brain fart by giving it a more positive spin than it deserves.

You will notice that Moorish herself, along with many of the women who promote the "money minded" lifestyle, are women who are incapable of earning the same type of money they expect their men to make.

Thus, if she and the others like her truly believed in the value of health, drive and ambition, SHE WOULD BE PRACTICING WHAT SHE PREACHES.

And you know, that's not a tall order. I've met women from here who do exactly this.

When women start to feel the urge to settle down and start a family they WILL start thinking about which men would best provide for one. Moorish's thread is NOT about this.

This thread was written with the absolute neglect of other qualities important for a healthy marriage or relationship, and it encourages the mercenary attitude of trading looks, youth and sex for the highest bidder, hence the instincts of most of the men here are correct when they decry her as just another type of prostitute.

Here is the thing:

Malaysian Chinese say things like "money minded is good" because we are MENTALLY ENSLAVED and understand LITTLE ELSE.

We don't understand the value of community. The majority of us do not understand the inner workings of true power because we have been kept apart from it. We don't even understand what humanity is. In their place, we absorb and repeat simple memes and ideologies like religion or whatever hell else we read from the newspapers. We are the number one consumerist race in the world, and also the most pliable to notions of hierarchy and superiority.

Threads like these show that as a people the Chinese of Malaysia have become by and large complete idiots only able to understand the lowest common denominators of intelligence.

In place of knowledge and understanding, we absorb hearsay, superstition and shallow notions of superiority based on class and race.

We are doomed. More and more of us are descending into ghettoes not just physical but mental, and we are staying there.

---

Added on October 4, 2009, 3:42 amDuke, you defend the ideals behind this thread without understanding that it's a completely different perspective from your own.

You're saying that you started getting ahead and drawing people to you just by changing your attitude.

This is not what this thread is about. This thread is about what men should HAVE, not about who or what they are, and certainly not about their future because according to this thread it does not matter..

Go back and look through Moorish's posts here. In one post she tries to defend her ideology by saying that since a poor guy could cheat on her and use her just as likely as a rich man would, she would rather be cheated on by a rich man.

Moorish is not like you. She is the typical GHETTO CHINESE.

People like her WILL evaluate your worth based only on what you have, and how USEFUL you are to her. She doesn't give two shits about who you are or what your story is.

And believe me, that's not even worth upset or outrage over. Like will find like and people like her will attract exactly who she deserves.

But I'm more concerned about the men here. We are lied to and manipulated by all quarters of society on a daily basis. I shall lift the veil to reveal the lie, by means fair or foul.

---

Added on October 4, 2009, 3:55 amDo you have rich friends?

I do.

They generally fall into one of two categories for the purposes of this thread:

1. Men who want to be appreciated for WHO they are, not for how useful to others they can be. In fact these men demand this.

2. Men who, in their minds, have accepted the reality that all women are whores and nothing more than glorified prostitutes for the depths they can go to just to chase what a "rich" man can provide. This can include money, a lavish lifestyle or even just DRUGS. Bear in mind that because these men came to be where they are through extreme effort and willpower, women like these will NEVER be viewed as peers.

If you're talking about attitude and mentality alone, rich men have basic commonalities with men who are not.

It's obvious that this thread is NOT about attitude or mentality.

----------------------

In summary, you and I both know what financial freedom and security can add to a man's life. It is for these reasons that men should pursue financial freedom and security.

NOT BECAUSE "GIRLS ARE MONEY MINDED AND PROUD OF IT".

If you want a hooker you can SNAP your fingers and get one. You don't have to marry or subordinate your will and entire life to their purposes. Which is exactly what Moorish's post is all about - a warped form of "girl power" from a ghetto Chinese. She knows this, and I know as well.

This post has been edited by Dickson Poon: Oct 4 2009, 04:14 AM

The spectre of the jobless bum living in poverty is just a bogeyman that women like you use to legitimise your shameless "money mindedness". Very few men are actually jobless bums who live in poverty. Very few women have actually dated career lorry drivers.

Most men out there have stable jobs and successes to varying degrees.

You use this bogeyman to make an example but the real application of this ideology is that the only thing that is valuable in all these men is the money you can get from them.