I realised one flaw for sejarah marking is that.

1. THEY DO NOT MINUS MARKS FOR WRONG ANSWER.

Example
The question is only 1 MARK. Lets say they ask  What happen to Rentap after james Brooke attacked him.
the Answer can be like this..
1. Rentap telah Dibunuh. Rentap telah dibicara. Rentap telah dibuang Negeri. Rentap telah digantung.

Assuming i wrote this in the answer...
Assuming Rentap telah dibunuh is correct.. THE Other answer they will read through, AND EVEN though its wrong, they WILL not put wrong and on the other HAND they give you 1 MARK because u have a correct answer there. Rentap Telah Dibunuh. Hence you score 1/1 Mark. At first i didnt believe this. I did this IN SPM 2008 and got A1 for it. At the essay part i didnt know what happen to Dato Patinggi after he diserang  and it was a 5 marks question. I put Dato Patinggi telah ditangkap. Dato patinggi telah dibicara. Dato Patinggi telah dihukum. Dato Patinggi telah Dibunuh. Dato Patinggi telah dibuang negeri.

AND PLEASE REMEMBER DONT WRITE LIKE THIS Dato Patinggi telah  ditangkap,dibunuh,dibicara. WRITE in different sentence.