alamak
another typo

damm
i shuldnt be multitasking


korek korek korek
semua silap
u come johor see
lagi stim

Simply increase the number of people using the bridge...

Look at the underground walkway from KLCC to Suria KLCC......

As i said, it is proposed to divide it to several sections and let adjacent building management responsible for that...

Bukit Bintang monorail is too much of a hassle you know...

In another matter, it will help lalas to conquer KLCC

This post has been edited by Kampung2005: Feb 19 2009, 10:26 AM

Ini si hawkie pandai betul he contribute pictar in Malaysian Most Pretty thread

something for the 80's babies

MY DARLING

u the shit im the flies

hello... ngai heh hakka nyin ~~

thats the new generation of romaticness

what u want from me ??

the one from pavillion across the road is pretty nice build. n my mate work sumwhere there.

yes cost.
Talking about plaza rakyat. arent they going to demolish it? its too old...to be structurally rebuild for reason wise.

Increasing the number of ppl using the bridge wont warrant pedestrians security
Proof can be had if you go to areas like Pudu, its a bus terminal, full of ppl yet its not safe, few friends got robbed in broad daylight in a crowded area not to mention those who kena pick pocketed
Proof aso can be had if you ask around if any been robbed around KLCC in brought day light or not

If you are into building or civil engineer, you'll realised that the foundation of a building both structurally and geographical conditions where the proposed building to be built is crucial
You just cant build something ontop of a weak structure/foundation

Similiarly, security and mentality in this case are akin to the aforementioned foundation

I hope u get the drift, i'm multitasking here, cant afford the luxury to dwelve deeper

Edit: Its even harder with split management, especially when u have a few management team sitting in a room, deciding on frequency of maintenance, cost of maintenance.


This post has been edited by ^Hobbes^: Feb 19 2009, 10:34 AM

want your attention and to watch the youtube video

integration of building... but this is not simple stuff . seriously.

Bukit bintang is not a problem; Jalan sultan ismail( if i`m nt mistake) tats the one..traffic flow to BB road is the one making it shitty.
BB square is ok; but the traffic management is need. NOT another pathetic super highway!

hou mou choi KK; weather mou lok sui?

ok aso for u i willing be shit
let u be fly
u flower i become bee
lets go holland together and run in hollandpic 2020

ngi heh hakka liang moi zai!

I would say the benefit outweights the risk, haha

Johannesburg can cut the pickpocket and crime, why not us?

I doubt we are worse than Johannesburg eh?

10 years ago, the CBD of Johannesburg faced gloom, a hotbed of crime and lack of pedestrian activities, when Amos Masondo cleared up Johannesburg with BRT and fill people inside CBD which was previously a hotbed of crime....

At the end of the day, there are several examples, it is up to DBKL to tidur or bangun



This post has been edited by Kampung2005: Feb 19 2009, 10:36 AM

about pudu again... the typical msia warns about it.
it was designed badly. I think its better be refurbish badly n rapidKL to be removed or those buses to be screened or merged one by one.


hi dazzy

Increasing the number of people is one of those traditional ways but still i believe securities should be increase especially when there is more people using the facilities. It doesn't has to be increasing proportionately with the numbers of people using the facility but at least adding more securities could reduce crime rate to a lower level rather than just relying on the traditional ways. You cannot simply said the more people at a specific location, the safer it is. It COULD look safer but it doesn't mean it WOULD be safer.

You rike it?

I wouldnt say the benefit outweighs the risk, for one when u involve corporate level, its alwys gain and benefit, not convenience
Unless its fully funded by the government

Sure, 20 years ago South Korea was worst than us, and see where they have gotten today, a reality check, we are going backwards instead of going forward
Other countries may or can show that they are capable, but do a reality check, whether we are capable or not
Its not the question of can or cannot, its proven that all countries can
But are we capable of doing it
I am sure if u do a reality check yourself, you'll know the answer
I doubt we can even hit wawasan 2020

u cant force ppl to walk route A or B; its to design as part of them.traffic flow is uncontrollable.
design against it make the design fail; the only option is to understand how the pattern of walking comes.

remind of walking; in BB area..i have no choice but walk like i`m in 4x4 of borneo.. manyak lobang oh

security is one thing; the crucial is have a proper design rather than have few post n zinc over for people to walk.

Korekshyun, it is more like 30 years ago....1970's era

More like 1960's when Park Chung Hee took control of Hankuk...

In 1950's, they are much worse than us, after Korean war, they got famine and lots of slums.....Malaya was a heaven compared to the battered Hankuk....

I think, Malaysia will look good "statistically", but real life, er..........you and me know lah....as a matter of fact, World Bank already not granting IBRD loan to Malaysia, claiming we have "graduated"...along with Rossiya and Brasil

Of course, statistically, we are beautiful, but real life, HAHAHA

This post has been edited by Kampung2005: Feb 19 2009, 10:45 AM

ohya kampung2005.

maybe you want to join this project.

http://www.urbarc.com/

by Grads Architect from UNSW.

omg so many cartoons!

World Bank already not granting IBRD loan to Malaysia, claiming we have "graduated"?

wat is IBRD?