Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
128 Pages « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Nokia ♥♪,Nokia 5800 XpressMusic a.k.a "TUBE" V9 ♥♪, Nokia Tube the Iphone Killer

views
     
ShaLong
post Feb 18 2009, 10:13 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(ridzyroo @ Feb 18 2009, 10:11 AM)
by using ur remote and reducing the volume =D
*
doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif im toking bout the pic quality... doh.gif

otho with flash.. the pic oso blur blur de cry.gif cry.gif
joshuawong
post Feb 18 2009, 10:17 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(ShaLong @ Feb 18 2009, 10:07 AM)
how to reduce the noise of the camera??
*
Change ur iso to low as high iso create more noise but then ur image will be abit under expose. There's pros and cons. U still can use Photoshop or the pre-installed nokia image editor to set it brighter.
ShaLong
post Feb 18 2009, 10:45 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(joshuawong @ Feb 18 2009, 10:17 AM)
Change ur iso to low as high iso create more noise but then ur image will be abit under expose. There's pros and cons. U still can use Photoshop or the pre-installed nokia image editor to set it brighter.
*
previously my iso was set to automatic.. now me trying to set to low... notworthy.gif notworthy.gif

how bout sharpness? hard?? soft??
joshuawong
post Feb 18 2009, 10:50 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(ShaLong @ Feb 18 2009, 10:45 AM)
previously my iso was set to automatic.. now me trying to set to low...  notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif

how bout sharpness? hard?? soft??
*
It depend you wan the images look soft or hard (more detail). Please dun put much high hope on this camera. Unless you shot it in sufficent lightling enviroment.

Eg;
user posted image
No photoshop, just added watermark.

This post has been edited by joshuawong: Feb 18 2009, 10:58 AM
ShaLong
post Feb 18 2009, 10:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(joshuawong @ Feb 18 2009, 10:50 AM)
It depend you wan the images look soft or hard (more detail). Please dun put much high hope on this camera. The quality are so so only.
*
yalo .... sweat.gif sweat.gif

i heard dat dey trying to upgrade the camera.. izit true??
tunertoobe
post Feb 18 2009, 10:55 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(ShaLong @ Feb 18 2009, 10:53 AM)
yalo ....  sweat.gif  sweat.gif

i heard dat dey trying to upgrade the camera.. izit true??
*
Only so much can be done with software updates. However I found that colour reproduction is slightly better in Auto compared to the old FW. Maybe it's just in my head though. tongue.gif
hvaly
post Feb 18 2009, 10:57 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
433 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


Actually our camera lens is not as poor as u all might think
just the back transparent cover make the pic worsen

for our tube, outdoor pic is brilliant !!
but
for those wish to take indoor pic , can try the following setting

use night mode, exposure -2, others set to automatic is sufficient biggrin.gif
this will significant reduce the noise level indoor. but the downside is slow in capturing

This post has been edited by hvaly: Feb 18 2009, 10:57 AM
tunertoobe
post Feb 18 2009, 11:00 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Yeah, outdoors under the sun is actually quite decent. Video under the same light condition is excellent for a phone IMO. thumbup.gif

user posted image

Hey hvaly, your settings for indoor shots works very well with the flash, I'm gonna put that in my cam. Thx! thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by tunertoobe: Feb 18 2009, 11:03 AM
joshuawong
post Feb 18 2009, 11:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Feb 18 2009, 11:00 AM)
Yeah, outdoors under the sun is actually quite decent. Video under the same light condition is excellent for a phone IMO.  thumbup.gif

user posted image
*
But then the WB look abit weird
tunertoobe
post Feb 18 2009, 11:05 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


Scuse me but, what's a WB? blush.gif
Cam definition n00b. laugh.gif
ShaLong
post Feb 18 2009, 11:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Jan 2007


QUOTE(joshuawong @ Feb 18 2009, 10:50 AM)
It depend you wan the images look soft or hard (more detail). Please dun put much high hope on this camera. Unless you shot it in sufficent lightling enviroment.

Eg;
user posted image
No photoshop, just added watermark.
*
shocking.gif tiz pictar snap by 5800?? so clear...

QUOTE(hvaly @ Feb 18 2009, 10:57 AM)
Actually our camera lens is not as poor as u all might think
just the back transparent cover make the pic worsen

for our tube, outdoor pic is brilliant !!
but
for those wish to take indoor pic , can try the following setting

use night mode, exposure -2, others set to automatic is sufficient biggrin.gif
this will significant reduce the noise level indoor. but the downside is slow in capturing
*
notworthy.gif ok.. will try it
joshuawong
post Feb 18 2009, 11:12 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(tunertoobe @ Feb 18 2009, 11:05 AM)
Scuse me but, what's a WB?  blush.gif
Cam definition n00b.  laugh.gif
*
White Balance. it look kinna dull in color. IMHO!
tunertoobe
post Feb 18 2009, 11:13 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,309 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Sabah-Australia-Shah Alam.


QUOTE(joshuawong @ Feb 18 2009, 11:12 AM)
White Balance. it look kinna dull in color. IMHO!
*
I was under a shadow of a building. biggrin.gif
Owh, white balance. laugh.gif
joshuawong
post Feb 18 2009, 11:13 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(ShaLong @ Feb 18 2009, 11:07 AM)
shocking.gif tiz pictar snap by 5800?? so clear...
notworthy.gif ok.. will try it
*
Yup! With tube. smile.gif
NicJolin
post Feb 18 2009, 11:17 AM

Stop monitoring =)
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Stop monitoring =)
Okay ever since I done a soft reset to resolve the certificate issue, now I have the 'no gateway reply' for my WLAN

OMG +_+

Any ideas guys?
konspiracy
post Feb 18 2009, 11:19 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
641 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(NicJolin @ Feb 18 2009, 11:17 AM)
Okay ever since I done a soft reset to resolve the certificate issue, now I have the 'no gateway reply' for my WLAN

OMG +_+

Any ideas guys?
*
i did soft rest for the "no gateway reply"
joshuawong
post Feb 18 2009, 11:22 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
310 posts

Joined: Jul 2006


QUOTE(konspiracy @ Feb 18 2009, 11:19 AM)
i did soft rest for the "no gateway reply"
*
There's a posiblity ur router is not assigning IP for ur tube. U try to on off your router and c. Do you set any WEP or Static IP for ur router?
NicJolin
post Feb 18 2009, 11:30 AM

Stop monitoring =)
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: Stop monitoring =)
It happen after I did soft reset, and any other solution b4 going to another reset? Its a pain to have to set all the settings all over again

tachlio
post Feb 18 2009, 11:32 AM

de~sign "ing"
*******
Senior Member
3,102 posts

Joined: May 2005
From: Penang *̡͌l̡*̡̡
According some forum, if you wan better pic, u try open the back cover the pic quality increase. But it anny if always need to do this.

Don know why Nokia use such plastic cover for it
konspiracy
post Feb 18 2009, 11:32 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
641 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
QUOTE(NicJolin @ Feb 18 2009, 11:30 AM)
It happen after I did soft reset, and any other solution b4 going to another reset? Its a pain to have to set all the settings all over again
*
you can back up your settings to mem card and restore them after the reset

128 Pages « < 25 26 27 28 29 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.4164sec    0.77    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 06:31 PM