Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V21!, The Orange Legion

views
     
sidewinderz
post Feb 22 2009, 01:43 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(ikttan @ Feb 22 2009, 01:22 AM)
I think Sony (or third party) will release something in that range and it will be priced below RM500  rclxm9.gif  to match the RM300-400 street price that's available for C and N.  But what is there to worry, I mean like a 2004 Honda City still cost more second hand than a new Pesona  whistling.gif ... wrong comparison ...

RM125 Hoya CPL?  Oooo ... where did you get it from ... cheap ...  thumbup.gif
*
haha...got it at ancorp mall..i wanted to get a 67mm CPL for my future tammy 1750...but it cost over rm200....=.=''

QUOTE(signither @ Feb 22 2009, 01:26 AM)
don't worry, sony new lens would be 50mm f/1.8, not f/1.7..

quoted from bro albert on new sony inventory:
in bold = already launched
*
phew...lets hope that is true...if not i gotta throw my lens away...haha...anyway...pic spam!! taken...got a lil gathering in my cousin's house just now...

user posted image

ps: guess how old is she...
sidewinderz
post Feb 23 2009, 10:46 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
hey...wanna ask...when i register my sony product, i do it through www.sonystyle.com or where? cause i cant seem to enter my address properly
sidewinderz
post Feb 25 2009, 05:22 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(selvenz @ Feb 25 2009, 04:50 PM)
Hi, im about to take a plunge and get the sony but not sure between the sonay a300 twin kit or a350 twin kit. I need some advice on this?

My primary aim is to take interior pictures of houses,condos etc but would also like to use it for exterior portrait,landscape and candid, based on cost/value which would be a better option ? would appreciate some help, altough i went thru 50 + pages i am more confused then ever? thks in advance
*
it totally depends on you....but it is known that the image quality for both cameras are the same..just that the megapixel is different..for me, i feel that a300 is more than enough...unless you wanna print like banner size picture...
sidewinderz
post Feb 27 2009, 10:22 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
hi, wanna ask what is the price of f42 and f58 now? planning to get it soon...
sidewinderz
post Feb 27 2009, 10:50 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(wcs2798 @ Feb 27 2009, 10:39 PM)
HVL-F42AM = RM750+-
HVL-F58AM = RM1100++
*
thx thx.. smile.gif both supports wireless flash right? jus tat f58 can swivel and the flash distance is different...is that it?
sidewinderz
post Feb 28 2009, 02:21 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(Zeegon @ Feb 28 2009, 01:55 PM)
Haha. Ok. Bought my a200 biggrin.gif.
Alpha user alpha user~~
Guys, first time battery need charge how long?
Need like handphone liddat?
*
how much you got it ar?
sidewinderz
post Feb 28 2009, 05:58 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
bro chiggy always with beautiful girls...so jealous.. sad.gif
sidewinderz
post Mar 1 2009, 10:34 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
how much is cz1680 going for? and how does it compare to tammy 1750?

any1 here can convince me or rather poison me to get the cobra?? tried reading reviews, watching videos on youtube...but i dun seem to have the urge to get it...sigh....feels complicated when using it
sidewinderz
post Mar 4 2009, 12:36 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
@achew
great shots bro...really like the card board dude...he is just plain cute!!!

wanna ask you guys, when you take shots at iso800 or even iso1600, do you all actually use pp to remove noise?
sidewinderz
post Mar 4 2009, 06:10 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Mar 4 2009, 05:58 PM)
heres my roughly comparison for CZ1680 and kit lense

1) Kit Lense
user posted image

2) CZ1680
user posted image

3) Kit lense 100% crop
user posted image

4) CZ 100% crop
user posted image

all the setting are same only the CZ use wider focal length....the colour and sharpness can differenciate very clearly here....
*
errr....what is the difference?? rclxub.gif rclxub.gif
sidewinderz
post Mar 4 2009, 06:42 PM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(neo_lam @ Mar 4 2009, 06:13 PM)
the sharpness and the colour....
*
hmm.gif hmm.gif hmm.gif i still can see it....

QUOTE(AlphaBeta @ Mar 4 2009, 06:14 PM)
kit lens suffers distortion...CZ is better..but from the pic..i really cant see the difference unless at 100% crop. Colour is the same...but i guess when shooting flowers/colourful things...CZ will be much better thumbup.gif .

nice side by side pic btw.. biggrin.gif
*
lol...mayb i'm still just too noob...laugh.gif after all those detailed explaination, i still dun get it...haha doh.gif doh.gif hopeless me...
sidewinderz
post Mar 7 2009, 12:29 AM

Long Live UV!!!
*******
Senior Member
3,966 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur
QUOTE(achew @ Mar 6 2009, 11:55 PM)
haha...i also dunno i get it for wad purpose..hopefully i wont regret and able to make a great use of it when i go to korea 2 weeks later....
*
bro, can also pm me how much you got it and where you got it from?
« Next Oldest · Photography, Digital Imaging & Video · Next Newest »
 

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
 0.0435sec    0.49    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 04:06 AM
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Removal Request
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025  IPS, Inc.