QUOTE(solstice818 @ Feb 27 2009, 02:44 PM)
From what I see, Heinze is slow,prone to mistakes and cant create physical presence like Dossena did.
Dossena has a lot of pace and physical presence.
I don't know but I remember maddie said that pacey players get more advantages than slow player.They will cause more problems than a slow player.Take an example from Hull, Mendy was easily one of the best player on field when they were playing against us.He doesnt have the skill of heinze or dossena but his pace cause us a lot of trouble and he even set up of the goals in the 2-2 draw...
It might be blessing in disguise that Ferguson didnt sell us after all...Heinze is too slow for BPL games (which pace play a vital part)to be honest.
P.s:Wish to hear more comment on Dossena Vs Heinze , which one do you prefer?
RM vs LIVDossena has a lot of pace and physical presence.
I don't know but I remember maddie said that pacey players get more advantages than slow player.They will cause more problems than a slow player.Take an example from Hull, Mendy was easily one of the best player on field when they were playing against us.He doesnt have the skill of heinze or dossena but his pace cause us a lot of trouble and he even set up of the goals in the 2-2 draw...
It might be blessing in disguise that Ferguson didnt sell us after all...Heinze is too slow for BPL games (which pace play a vital part)to be honest.
P.s:Wish to hear more comment on Dossena Vs Heinze , which one do you prefer?
Heinze vs Benny ( and benny score a goal )
no cross from heinze.
LIV vs Man C
Dossena vs Ireland or Micah ( and they didnt score except bellamy deflection goal )
dossena cross a lot..
hrmm,which one eh?
Feb 27 2009, 04:30 PM

Quote
0.5042sec
0.74
7 queries
GZIP Disabled