QUOTE(Lord_sepulchrave @ Feb 23 2009, 10:37 AM)
lol... have u try this game b4 making ur BS statement??
i think crysis was rubbish.. it was definately pretty... but the gameplay was generic and crap and so was the storyline...
why bother going invisble if it runs out in 5 seconds and the enemy spots u if u shoot or grab one of them?
and i think AI in crysis much dumb than fear 2... at least in fear 2, its hard to kill without slow-mo action....
nah, it just a game.. why u so serious about it...

Why are u talking about the gameplay here? I was just arguing about FEAR having "better graphic" than Crysis. I played FEAR, and FEAR 2 demo, and I do agree that it is a fun game, meaning good gameplay, or enjoyable gaming experience. And seems like you DO agree with me that Crysis is pretty.
Read carefully next time.
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Feb 23 2009, 10:46 AM)
For me,better graphics =/= realistic graphics.So what if a game have realistic graphics,i prefer games with good art direction or at least they try to make their game look unique like Mirror Edge,the latest PoP or even RA3's cartoon graphics.
I somehow agree with you on this. Art direction is more important that realism. For example, artistically, Prince of Persia looks better than Crysis. But you definitely cannot say that Prince of Persia has a BETTER GRAPHIC than Crysis.
This post has been edited by trashtalker: Feb 23 2009, 11:08 AM