Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Post Your Screenshots Here! V2

views
     
trashtalker
post Feb 23 2009, 10:05 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(wen9x88 @ Feb 22 2009, 11:38 PM)
FEAR 2.
for me graphic is better than crysis.
because more smooth and looks good.
this is fun,but not at the early game.
but don know why score so slow.
may b the game story bad?
but i care the gameplay.
haha
*
BS! If "smooth" graphic = better graphic, then why bother about things like high resolution texture, higher polygon count, etc... just make every damn thing in the game as round shape and without texture. That will make everything as smooth as possible. Then apply a very high AA to also smooth all the edges out...

better graphic = realistic graphic. IMO, human model in F.E.A.R. engine looks like wax figurine. It is a 3-year-old engine for god sake. Dun compare it with Crysis, where you can make out each wrinkle on the character's face.
trashtalker
post Feb 23 2009, 11:07 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(Lord_sepulchrave @ Feb 23 2009, 10:37 AM)
lol... have u try this game b4 making ur BS statement?? hmm.gif  hmm.gif  rolleyes.gif  rolleyes.gif
i think crysis was rubbish.. it was definately pretty... but the gameplay was generic and crap and so was the storyline...
why bother going invisble if it runs out in 5 seconds and the enemy spots u if u shoot or grab one of them?
and i think AI in crysis much dumb than fear 2... at least in fear 2, its hard to kill without slow-mo action....  icon_rolleyes.gif
nah, it just a game.. why u so serious about it...  doh.gif
*
Why are u talking about the gameplay here? I was just arguing about FEAR having "better graphic" than Crysis. I played FEAR, and FEAR 2 demo, and I do agree that it is a fun game, meaning good gameplay, or enjoyable gaming experience. And seems like you DO agree with me that Crysis is pretty.

Read carefully next time.

QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Feb 23 2009, 10:46 AM)
For me,better graphics =/= realistic graphics.So what if a game have realistic graphics,i prefer games with good art direction or at least they try to make their game look unique like Mirror Edge,the latest PoP or even RA3's cartoon graphics.
*
I somehow agree with you on this. Art direction is more important that realism. For example, artistically, Prince of Persia looks better than Crysis. But you definitely cannot say that Prince of Persia has a BETTER GRAPHIC than Crysis.

This post has been edited by trashtalker: Feb 23 2009, 11:08 AM

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.5850sec    0.54    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 08:20 PM