QUOTE(samlee860407 @ Jan 31 2009, 11:06 PM)
If Panasonic was making plasma panels for Pioneer, how come you say Pioneer has better black levels?http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.p...-on-tv-business
CLOSED
|
|
Feb 8 2009, 08:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(samlee860407 @ Jan 31 2009, 11:06 PM) If Panasonic was making plasma panels for Pioneer, how come you say Pioneer has better black levels?http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.p...-on-tv-business |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 11 2009, 11:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Commontan now selling the Panasonic PV80 for a mere RM3000.
Who would have ever thought 42 inch plasma would be so cheap? Just last year, it was Rm6000. It keeps dropping in price. I wonder what the price would be in 5 years time? |
|
|
Feb 12 2009, 09:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Today, shop guy offered me Pioneer 508xg for 13k. Is this a good buy?
Is this model better than Pana PY850 Full HD? He said many say that the Pioneer HD ready is much better than even Panasonic PY850. Is this true? This post has been edited by deepan2004: Feb 12 2009, 09:40 PM |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 10:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(edwintey @ Feb 13 2009, 04:03 PM) Yes, go for it. This price should be the plain nett price, right? Without Mini HT System. I agree with you that Pioneer has the best black. Are you sure a 1080p Panasonic is much clearer than a 720p Pioneer?Pioneer Malaysia has no more stock (428 or 508). Make sure the shop has the stock not the use or display set. If you didn't buy you would regret. Trust me, chose Pioneer Kuro not other, whatever those has Full HD or even 100/200Hz, tak boleh lawan lah kawan. Because Resolution is not the only & main issue, as long as output 1080p video signal. |
|
|
Feb 13 2009, 10:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
how come the 9th generation is not here? If there is a 9th generation, is it still worth spending so much on a 508?
I see in UK, they all have the 509. In US, it is 10th generation I think as I see PDP5010 So, it is really worth paying so much for 2 generations old technology? Might as well get a Panasonic for half the price. This post has been edited by deepan2004: Feb 13 2009, 11:02 PM |
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 03:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
thanks ar88. Now I am convinced its not worth buying the 42 inch pana.
Might as well go for the 50 inch. What is the lowest price you got for the 50 inch. Btw, from what you said above, can a dvd player like the pionner 410 upscale a 700mb avi to 1080? |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 06:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Feb 15 2009, 04:32 PM) not sure, you have to ask pioneer 410 users, AVIs are a mix bags, cos it can contain various codecs for video and audio not to mention codec bit rates and resolutions.. so very high chance it won't play some of the AVIs available around.. bro, you are right abt avi, so many bitrates, codec etc.but if you going to pair the 410 to a PV80 or a 50incher, I don't really see the need for a 1366x768 panel just for the sake of "viewing" 700mb upscaled to 1080p material.. cos there is not much data to begin with.. I think these low res AVIs would look just fine on the PV80... unless you start talking about 720p MKV, 1080k MKV, or Blu-rays.. btw, any dvd players can play mkv? I know WD TV can but what abt dvd players? but thanks for informing me that the pana 42 is not really a true 720p HD ready. |
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 07:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
what is htpc?
|
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 07:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
cleaner to get the wdtv, cheap and simple.
|
|
|
Feb 15 2009, 11:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
[quote=azbro,Feb 15 2009, 09:15 PM]
Aiyoh....between the 42inch and 50inch...if got the money sure grab 50inchler..no need to think twice... thanks. I am quite certain of a 50 inch now. Btw, is it worth it paying more than double for a Pioneer? I always believe in getting good value for money and RM5500 for a 50 inch Panasonic seems good value. Is it worth paying RM8000 more just to get perfect black levels? |
|
|
Feb 17 2009, 07:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Skylinestar @ Feb 16 2009, 07:58 PM) the bigger the better. there's no such thing as tv too big. I agree with you, the bigger, the better. Thanks also to all the others who gave me great advice! Am going for the Panasonic.a recommendation from sony, the viewing distance should be 3 times the vertical measurement the tv screen. Why spend on an expensive Ferrari, when you can get a Porsche, which is as good as the Ferrari!. Added on February 17, 2009, 7:09 am QUOTE(azbro @ Feb 16 2009, 09:26 AM) If got money get the pioneer of course.....but as good as the pioneer is, if your source is not good enough...the engine can do only so much....like the saying goes, garbage in, garbage out. If you are going hi-end with the pioneer, expect to go high end with the rest of the equipment as well. I think plasma and LCD will be around for a long long time. New and better technologies may come about, but it may not be mainstream. Just like flying and planes, there are planes that have the technology to fly from KL to London in 5 hours but yet, we still use the 14 hour flights cause of economical and commercial reasons.Times are bad these days, money hard to come but easy to spent, so settle for the Panny 50inch...forget abt the pioneer. Technology is moving forward, since Plasma is legacy stuff, expect it to end in a few years time...its gonna be SED or OLED or some other technology to rule. So, trust me, plsma and LCd will be around for at least 10 years more. This post has been edited by deepan2004: Feb 17 2009, 07:09 AM |
|
|
Feb 18 2009, 11:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Feb 19 2009, 11:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 19 2009, 10:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(myhotgary2 @ Feb 19 2009, 09:59 PM) are u kidding me?? That is my opinion. What may look excellent to me, may look average to you.Pioneers boast a much more natural and real picture compared to sony.. Not to mention the deeper blacks.. Some people say RM500,000 DCS Scarlatti sound separates sound really good whilst another may say, a RM500 Philips radio sound the same. This post has been edited by deepan2004: Feb 19 2009, 10:49 PM |
|
|
Feb 19 2009, 11:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Feb 19 2009, 11:37 PM) while audio quality can be super subjective.. video is as subjective as audio. So what you talking abt?but video is probably more objective (unless you are blind)hehe.. that's why, for example, people who review projectors can actually say to a certain fact that the HC7000 mitsubishi is amongst the sharpest LCD/DLPsingle chipper projector in the market compared to sharp or AE3000 etc.. same goes with a 9gen pioneer elite Plasma next to a sony XBR LCD or a A950 LCD 3way shootout.. the winner can be quite certain depending on which category.. color, deep blacks/ deinterlace artifacts, grayscale tracking etc.. to the point you can take a photo and pinpoint where it doesn't look good.. |
|
|
Feb 20 2009, 12:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Feb 19 2009, 11:49 PM) if that is the case, so one can't tell if projector A is sharper than projector B ? Some say, Bowers & Wilkins give clear and sharper sound, another may say, another brand and so on.or if this BD recording has more grain than normal films? or if a pioneer plasma does have deeper blacks than a CCFL backlight LCD? Added on February 19, 2009, 11:52 pmsome can't tell apart between a proper MP3 and a CD recording (so thats' subjective) I dunno about you, but I can always tell between a Blu-ray (with HD content) and a DVD showing on a HDTV Like I said, video and audio are both subjective. So what you cerita banyak above? If video is so objective as you claim, everybody will just buy one or two brands only ie Pionner etc. How come people buy Hitachi, Philips, LG etc? As I said it is subjective. This post has been edited by deepan2004: Feb 20 2009, 12:05 AM |
|
|
Feb 20 2009, 07:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(ar188 @ Feb 20 2009, 12:10 AM) because the price is cheaper.. you think if the pioneer kuro 428 is same price as PV80, which would people here choose?? I definitely know which I would choose. Cannot argue more. You think you are a self proclaimed expert in HD and Video.please dun use audio "golden ears" comparison on the HD video world.. they are 2 different things.. no need golden eyes to see the difference.. |
|
|
Feb 21 2009, 08:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(lousycar @ Feb 21 2009, 08:34 AM) Are you sure about this? If so, I will wait until MarchAdded on February 21, 2009, 8:59 am QUOTE(ycs @ Feb 21 2009, 07:47 AM) I hear commontan selling that price too. She is very reliable I heard.I am also waiting for the 50PV80 to drop but why does it not drop as fast as the 42 inch? now the gap is too far, one RM3000 and the other RM5500. Nearly double. For a mere 8 inches, for double the price? This post has been edited by deepan2004: Feb 21 2009, 08:59 AM |
|
|
Feb 27 2009, 07:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
147 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(g5sim @ Feb 27 2009, 02:17 AM) i did lah (probably other brand). i looked at the price - shake head and moved to the next one in line. but the i think it was the RM18K was the Pioneer Kuro. Panasonic was never that expensive. not in 2008 anyways I too remember. It was 2007. 50 inch Panasonic was RM19,999 whilst other brands were half the price. It was definitely wrongly priced as it was only US$2000 at that time in the US.Then when they launched the PV80, suddenly it went to RM9999. What a joke! This post has been edited by deepan2004: Feb 27 2009, 07:05 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0478sec
0.58
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 06:11 PM |