Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CLOSED

views
     
attentional
post Feb 2 2009, 12:35 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



QUOTE(KCv3 @ Feb 1 2009, 10:44 PM)
Am looking for Plasma 42". Saw lots of good feedback on panny PV80H (RM3.2k). Anyone has any input on Hitachi E102A (RM3.5k) and LG PG60 (RM3.8k)?

Saw the Hitachi E102A, the picture output turns out not as'fat' as others.
*
Trust your eyes, don't listen to some dumb@ss who judge a product by its brand.There are good and bad products in every brand.
attentional
post Feb 2 2009, 11:08 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



QUOTE(htkaki @ Feb 2 2009, 10:51 PM)
Not to mention at bigger size too
*
eh htkaki how cum your price list page seldom update one?like the panasonic pricelist,last update so long ago.
now the price stil same ker??..
attentional
post Apr 22 2009, 08:53 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



QUOTE(Barricade @ Apr 22 2009, 08:31 AM)
Just taken my breakfast already got drama. tongue.gif After some googling, found this:

Burn-in, sometimes also referred as permanent image retention, is an effect of an after-image appearing on your plasma or other phosphor-based screen after a still picture is displayed for an extended period of time. The most common type of burn-in is the result of watching 4:3 video with black bars on both sides on a 16:9 screen. Other examples of burn-in may include 2.35:1 movies watched on a 16:9 screen (black bars on top and bottom), non-transparent channel logos, fixed parts of the screen used, for example, for teletext or weather display, video and computer games, logos and menus, or even a paused DVD or DVD title menu. biggrin.gif

http://www.plasmasaver.com/burnin.html

I wonder what Lightning69 will come up to counter these articles.
*
I don't think there is anything more to say, the wise will just choose to apologise for speaking too quickly. I read lots and lots of articles before decided to purchase my plasma, and almost all mention about not viewing 2.35:1 and 4:3 in the first 100 hours or so. That obviously contributed to burn-in.
attentional
post Apr 22 2009, 10:10 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



QUOTE(ic-klass @ Apr 22 2009, 10:02 AM)
I agree with the precaution on burn-in issue during the first 100 hours of plasma panel. I also agree that the burn-in issue has been tackled by the manufacturer (but may be not 100% yet), but its quite rare to hear such incident now. Even in the latest gen panny plamsa manula also stated about not to display long hour of static images.

what would worry me (and my be u) is the problem of image-retention. Through obserbation (and some reading), this is a temporary problem (if you didnt intentinally play long hour of static images). Most of the time i watch Astro (with their "every-channels-got-logo") and also those "letter-box" movies. What i noticed is, when u switch off the plasma, u can see there is some "unequall" blacks at the site of the logo. But it will disappear later on.
Browse around the net, there are plenty of playable DVd/BD iso file that supposed to "mature" these plasma cell evenly.
I' use Pixel Protector and "break in DVd, break in images, which i download from the net. The whole idea was to illuminates the whole cell with same colour/intensity so that the gases "burn/spark" evently..

Only my 2 cents..
*
Hi, do you mind to share the title of the bd/dvd? So we can easily locate them?
attentional
post Apr 30 2009, 08:51 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



That is so true, you think people do not aware that 42" Full HD LCD is around the same price with 42" HD Plasma? And look at the number of plasma users keep increasing by day! People goes for plasma for amazing black and color. And 42" plasma is HD ready, it is already set by the statutory body, no point arguing bout that.
attentional
post Apr 30 2009, 09:40 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



LOLz lightning96 kena taruk kau kau yet again. drool.gif
attentional
post Jun 12 2009, 09:36 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



QUOTE(yfyap69 @ Jun 11 2009, 08:59 AM)
I had tried with X10 and PS3. Result not good compare to LCD. Not sure about S10 though. For console or PC, I think LCD will be better due to the color is more vibrant.
*
I beg to defer, x10 color cannot lose to lcd, unless you're talking about samsung led lcd
attentional
post Jun 12 2009, 10:59 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



strange, i am a lcd user for so long, from samsung to lg to sharp to sony, this is the first time i switch to plasma, i found that plasma color is so much better compared to lcd - games & blu
attentional
post Jun 12 2009, 11:20 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



serious, my gf also say fuuuuuuyohhhh color so much better and natural. i never bother to look at lcd again
attentional
post Jun 12 2009, 12:10 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
358 posts

Joined: Dec 2007



how u know suckerland g10 uses the neopdp screen? before s10 was launched here everyone though our version is neopdp too, turns out rakyat suckerland doesn't qualify to use neopdp on s10

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0713sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:07 AM