I was wondering a windows xp 64bit can support up to how much ram?
Would I need the extra RAM supported in the 64bit to play World of Warcraft to achieve greater performance/much higher fps 100+?
Windows XP 64bit and 32bit, Gaming
Windows XP 64bit and 32bit, Gaming
|
|
Jan 8 2009, 10:25 PM, updated 17y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
164 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
I was wondering a windows xp 64bit can support up to how much ram?
Would I need the extra RAM supported in the 64bit to play World of Warcraft to achieve greater performance/much higher fps 100+? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 8 2009, 10:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,892 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 8 2009, 10:45 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
164 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
but isnt vista lyk over all bad? and how much ram can a 64bit support? like if it cud support 8 gigs wud my gaming rly need it? wud it utilize n increase performance lyk mad?
|
|
|
Jan 8 2009, 11:01 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,251 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
vista 64-bit would be less troublesome than xp 64-bit from what i read
and what so bad about vista? i have asked in so many threads but nobody seems to care to provide any rigid answer for it for gaming, even 4GB is considered enough already, what's important are the 3D card and processor |
|
|
Jan 8 2009, 11:18 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
22,158 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Singapore |
Vista x64... hmm
Home Basic - 8GB Home Premium - 12GB Business - 16GB Enterprise/Ultimate - 128GB or more enough for u??? anyway, Windows limit each program can use at most 2GB RAM only... Added on January 8, 2009, 11:20 pm QUOTE(cyew86 @ Jan 8 2009, 11:01 PM) vista 64-bit would be less troublesome than xp 64-bit from what i read according to them... Vista's bad becuz others say it's bad... so XP is good... and what so bad about vista? i have asked in so many threads but nobody seems to care to provide any rigid answer for it for gaming, even 4GB is considered enough already, what's important are the 3D card and processor This post has been edited by astria: Jan 8 2009, 11:20 PM |
|
|
Jan 8 2009, 11:38 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,644 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Heaven to HELL |
QUOTE(kitg90 @ Jan 8 2009, 10:25 PM) I was wondering a windows xp 64bit can support up to how much ram? i'm playing bioshock now on vista 64 sp1.Would I need the extra RAM supported in the 64bit to play World of Warcraft to achieve greater performance/much higher fps 100+? max setting, max AA & AF, 1680*1050 resolution. fps = ~100 - 100+ in any situation............... u say leh............... 64bit dun hav much problem........ only hav compability problem wit some freeware & pirate stuff.............. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 12:04 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
164 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
ic ic ok. windows limits it? is thr a way 2 unlimit it? lol
|
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 01:30 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
215 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
it's only a virtual memory limit.
to change the limit, go to the boot loader (boot.ini) and add "/3GB" at the end of the partition path for example if i wan to change the limit up to 3GB. usually, a typical application will not used up to 2GB memory. This post has been edited by shinnyx: Jan 9 2009, 01:31 AM |
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 09:23 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,391 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: KL |
in my opinion,for gaming, i prefer vista still. coz 1 reason: directX10. ntg much. if u only play new games, of coz use 64 bits, it does loads faster in real life application.but most consumer motherboard only limit u to 8gb-16gb ram nowadays.even 4gb ram sticks i cant find yet.so if X58 chipset core i7,max ram tht can be bought NOW shud be 2gb(per stick) X 6 sticks( 6 memory slots)=12 gb.32 bits OS max limit 3.5gb, 64bits OS can fit till terabytes of memory in theory.
This post has been edited by k!nex: Jan 9 2009, 09:23 AM |
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 10:34 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
15,022 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama |
Frame rates depends more on ur GPU and CPU regardless of bits in the O/S. Having more RAM is not going to help you achieve insane frame rates if ur main factor (CPU + GPU) sucks. I suggest u save ur money to upgrade those first.
btw..why do u need 100fps?? 60 fps enuff already-lar... |
|
|
Jan 12 2009, 10:07 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,738 posts Joined: Dec 2006 From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin |
QUOTE(Matrix @ Jan 9 2009, 10:34 AM) Frame rates depends more on ur GPU and CPU regardless of bits in the O/S. Having more RAM is not going to help you achieve insane frame rates if ur main factor (CPU + GPU) sucks. I suggest u save ur money to upgrade those first. If not mistaken, last time a fellow forummer did a comparison of 2X 1GB/4X 1GB/2 X2GB of DDRII 800MHz Kingston HyperX Performance RAMs but there's no difference in frame rates. btw..why do u need 100fps?? 60 fps enuff already-lar... |
|
|
Jan 13 2009, 04:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,647 posts Joined: Feb 2006 From: Jelutong Penang |
QUOTE(kitg90 @ Jan 8 2009, 10:25 PM) I was wondering a windows xp 64bit can support up to how much ram? with 64 bit OS..Would I need the extra RAM supported in the 64bit to play World of Warcraft to achieve greater performance/much higher fps 100+? actually we got 2^64 byte of rams.. = 18446744073709551616 KB once before with 16bit OS we stuck in 2^16 =65536 KB or 64MB |
| Change to: | 0.0190sec
0.45
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 05:39 AM |