yeah. quad is definitely the best choice considering the future. many oncoming software will definitely be multi threaded.
Q8200 vs Q6600 if going for 3.2Ghz only..., Your opinions and input appreciated.
Q8200 vs Q6600 if going for 3.2Ghz only..., Your opinions and input appreciated.
|
|
Jan 3 2009, 11:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Eden |
yeah. quad is definitely the best choice considering the future. many oncoming software will definitely be multi threaded.
|
|
|
Jan 12 2009, 08:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,812 posts Joined: Dec 2008 From: Eden |
QX6800 is already 2.9ghz at stock speed. so u didnt need to do much tweaking just to get to 3.2ghz.
bout that (voltage), yup. it will shorten the lifespan but only if u push it too hard. if just do light OC, there wont be much damage or maybe none. (note:decent cooling is a MUST if u're into OC) |
| Change to: | 0.0159sec
0.67
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 03:04 AM |