Q8200 vs Q6600 if going for 3.2Ghz only..., Your opinions and input appreciated.
|
|
 Jan 4 2009, 01:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,550 posts Joined: Aug 2008  
|
QUOTE(bryansu @ Jan 3 2009, 11:06 PM) Even a E2160 over clock to 3.2 can have the same performance as a quad core 3.2ghz processor if the application doesn't support multi-thread. Believe it or not, but reality is so. i dont think so... e2160 has just 1mb l2 cache while q6600 has 8mb... there will surely be a difference there q6600 > q8200... nuff said... 3.2ghz on stock vcore with no problemo  |
|
|
Jan 4 2009, 02:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,550 posts Joined: Aug 2008
|
QUOTE(Eng_Tat @ Jan 4 2009, 01:53 PM) ibenq vista 32 bit can fully utilise 8gb ram? nope... installed for fun ... now got 2gb nia ler... didnt update siggy @@ |
|
|
Jan 4 2009, 08:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,550 posts Joined: Aug 2008
|
QUOTE(mantiz125 @ Jan 4 2009, 03:24 PM) 32 bit can detect 3GB the most.. 32bit vista can detect my 8gb with no whatsoever patch, but only uses 3328mb of ramQUOTE(limsy @ Jan 4 2009, 08:08 PM) Thanks guys... I appreciate all the input, I definitately learnt a lot. just up ur bus speed to 457... and up voltage for ram,proc,northbridge if necessary  Since i'm a noob at OC... I have absolutely no idea what's the FSB thingie but from your explaination... I'm guessing you're saying Q8200 using normal Kingston RAM and the EP45-UD3L motherboard can do it without a problem? Can give more details on what should I do to get my FSB to 457? Sorry... I know I should do more reading b4 asking so many questions *blush* ... but I have to decide tonite bcos I'm buying them tomorrow. Thanks again! |
| Change to: |  0.0167sec
 0.76
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 12:56 PM |
Quote