Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The All-New Honda City 2009 Official Thread, (See page 1 for info)

views
     
931002
post Dec 29 2008, 01:24 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(sysh @ Dec 29 2008, 01:06 AM)
wub.gif the Tafetta White. Too bad they didn't launch it here..sigh
*
i suggest you buy the new stream. you can get white colour for stream. isn't it?my neighbour bought the new stream last month, white colour. he tinted it with black colour tint and replace the original sport rims with the new black 17" alloy rims. the car looks very nice. he also plans to customize his car with mugen aerokit. thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by 931002: Dec 29 2008, 01:34 AM
931002
post Dec 29 2008, 01:39 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(Travies @ Dec 29 2008, 01:31 AM)
for white color, can choose either stream or jazz.. hehe now vios also available in white.
*
have you read my comparisons between accord and mazda 6? isn't ok?
931002
post Dec 29 2008, 11:28 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(keii-kun @ Dec 29 2008, 01:40 PM)
well, have test drive, rammed the car to 7k rpm (to test the i-vtec open). a bit disappointed , but it is a CITY after all. 1.5 i-vtec gives u mild vtec feel.

but the cabin quietness is ok, during vtec open, u can hear a small 'praang' but that's it. it dies at 7k rpm.

was disappointed with the price and HM. it should priced lower or with more features. now i even realized that modulo E-spec got Goodyear excellence..hmmm....
rm4,750 for modulo kit is way too expensive for me, heavy 16" modulo rim is RM2480, might as well get kedai potong 16" japan lightweight. better.

btw, did u guys know that Thailand's release got Modulo Grille oso, damn nice....

in India, u can get White, and manual trans. price? less than RM60K.
Honda India : Honda Citywebsite more detailed info for City compared to HM.

in conclusion, my wife likes it and booked and confirmed PMM. arriving march. Squeezed the salesman for free test drive shirt and card holder laugh.gif

as for tinting, HM / Kah motor gives RM500 voucher for a Kah Motor-Vcool tint (vcool is their partner here), so a tint with 63% infrared tint, costs RM1700 or can go to Vcool and get 15% discount for tinting.
*
yes, modulo grille looks very nice. but , unfortunately, our HM city does have that. i have booked the car. ASM colour. 1.5 e. the sales man said , i can receive my car on April next year. what a long, long waiting list. cry.gif
931002
post Dec 30 2008, 09:21 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(Travies @ Dec 29 2008, 12:10 PM)
thanks for the comparison, but i would rather prefer 2.4 accord vs mazda 2.5. thanks dude. if got time, compare city with other cars like latio, swift, elantra etc... hehe  thumbup.gif
*
CITY 1.5E (RM89,980) vs LATIO 1.6 PREMIUM (RM92,929)

1. Engine: city- 1.5 SOHC 120ps 145nm
latio- 1.6 DOHC 109ps 153nm
2. Transmission: city - 5speed auto with paddle shift
latio- 4speed auto
3. Steering type: city- electronic power steering
latio- electronic power steering
4. Suspension: city- front MacPherson strut, rear Torsion Beam
latio- front MacPherson strut, rear Torsion Beam
5. Brakes: city- disc brake front and rear
latio- front disc brake, rear drum brake
6. Dimensions: city- length: 4395mm
width: 1715mm
height:1470mm
wheelbase: 2550mm
ground clearance: 150mm
curb weight: 1160kg
latio- length: 4415mm
width: 1695mm
height: 1535mm
wheelbase: 2600mm
ground clearance: 160mm
curb weight: 1154kg
7. Tire size: city- 185/55r16
latio- 185/65r15
8. Head lamps: city- halogen
latio- halogen
9. Side mirror with turnig lights: city- available
latio- none
10. 4 reverse sensor: city- available
latio- 2 sensors only
11. Leather steering wheel: city- available
latio- available
12. Paddle shift: city- available
latio- none
13. USB connector: city- available
latio- none
14. ABS, EBD, and BA: city- available
latio- available
15. Dual airbags: city- available
latio- available
16. Body colours: city- blue, black, PMM, silver, beige
latio- silver, gray, black, red, white
17. Turning radius: city- 5.0m
latio- 5.2m
18. Steering wheel with audio control: city- available
latio- none

931002
post Dec 30 2008, 11:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(andrekua @ Dec 30 2008, 11:08 PM)
Dont you think Honda's designers and engineers are a bit too arrogant?
Its a cool looking car, but the spec, wth is wrong with them?

Just take a simple example. Old Honda City. They have VTEC, and then CVT, and then the sporty seat, and on top of that, spring that is more like sport spring, hard like hell. They are aiming to sell to youngster what. ALL THESE but SOHC engine? Come on!! If SOHC really so good, why their top end big VTEC is DOHC ler?

I will go for a test drive also. Very free lately. The exterior is really chun, but Im not a fan of exterior looks. Really wanted to see if Honda really made improvement over the old City or just a matter of a beautiful cover only.

BTW, on Honda vs Toyota, have to say Honda is the young blood and more daring to try new things while Toyota instead of being improving on small mistake, you should say they are more to the conventional side which is be safe rather than sorry. This is why they always relied on older technology that works and practical. Thats why Toyota main selling isnt styling but they still sells which is very strange (even though Im driving a company Vios). Another good example was Altis vs Civic.
*
whats wrong with SOHC engine? what honda wants to show is that they can built high output engine eventhough they use SOHC engine. 1.5 SOHC, 120PS AND 174NM.anyway, can vios produce HIGH output if its engine SOHC? toyota relied on older technology because the company wants to cut cost. if you see high quality toyota models like LEXUS, the cars have a lot of new technology but the price is exorbitant. thus, LEXUS lose to other "orang putih" cars like merc and bmw. besides, toyota always design its car with old design with big, big square-shaped headlamps and the car does look sleek. etc. camry and altis. the grille always too big like old merc 70's. at the end of the day, people get tired and prefer more aerodynamic cars like honda and mazda. even merc has change its style. old merc looks like a box, but the new merc(etc. cls350) is sleeker and has modern design with its stylish headlamps. anyway, every people has their own taste. one can buy toyota and one can buy other type of japanese-made cars. whistling.gif however, nowadays, all new civic can be seen easily on the road compare to all new altis. thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by 931002: Dec 30 2008, 11:49 PM
931002
post Dec 31 2008, 01:02 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(andrekua @ Dec 30 2008, 11:08 PM)
Dont you think Honda's designers and engineers are a bit too arrogant?
Its a cool looking car, but the spec, wth is wrong with them?

Just take a simple example. Old Honda City. They have VTEC, and then CVT, and then the sporty seat, and on top of that, spring that is more like sport spring, hard like hell. They are aiming to sell to youngster what. ALL THESE but SOHC engine? Come on!! If SOHC really so good, why their top end big VTEC is DOHC ler?

I will go for a test drive also. Very free lately. The exterior is really chun, but Im not a fan of exterior looks. Really wanted to see if Honda really made improvement over the old City or just a matter of a beautiful cover only.

BTW, on Honda vs Toyota, have to say Honda is the young blood and more daring to try new things while Toyota instead of being improving on small mistake, you should say they are more to the conventional side which is be safe rather than sorry. This is why they always relied on older technology that works and practical. Thats why Toyota main selling isnt styling but they still sells which is very strange (even though Im driving a company Vios). Another good example was Altis vs Civic.
*
Modern SOHC Honda engine is proven better than old technology Toyota DOHC.
Accord R20A SOHC engine produce nearly 10ps output higher than Toyota DOHC engine (148ps). Even though the new accord is havier than Camry, the 0-100 time is faster than Camry. This clearly shows that Honda SOHC engine is better than Camry DOHC engine.

Honda replaces its K20A DOHC 2003 Accord engine with newly developed R20A SOHC engine on Accord 2008. This new R20A engine has a lot of advantages over the old K20A engine. Some of the advantages of the R20A engine is:
1. Light weight
2. Higher output (156ps compared with 150ps on K20A)
3. Higher torque (189nm compared with 186nm on K20A)
4. Smaller in dimension
5. More efficient (less mechanical frictions loss due to less camshaft)
6. Variable length intake manifold to spread torque over the entire RPM range,
7. Integrated exhaust manifold to reduced space.
8. New i-VTEC technology that control the amount of fuel by controling the valve
opening and closing timing instead of using trottle valve in a conventional
engine. This will reduce pumping loses which will make the engine more
efficient.
9. Coated cylinder block to futher reduce friction loses.
10. Oil jet to cool piston which enabled the engine to run on higher compression
ratio (higher output without need to use higher octane number fuel).
11. Additional air flow sensor on both intake and exhaust to precisely control the
exhaust emmision for a more environmental friendly engine.
12. And many more....

Conclusion:
Honda main target is to constantly improving their product to satisfy their customer and environment. Not like Toyota, they still use the old technology engine so that they can cut cost and offer cheap cosmetic items to their customer just to attract old minded and old tech customer rclxub.gif as long as they can sell their product. (eg: Avanza and Inova still use cheap non-independant rear suspension (axle type same as lorry and old van), Camry still use cheap macpherson type front suspension, WISH still use rear non-independant beam suspension same as old Iswara. Vios, Altis, Avanza, Inova, Wish and Camry still use 4 speed auto transmission, all Hondas are already use 5 speed. All this Toyota tricks are not well known to their old minded and old tech customer rclxub.gif in malaysia.

Think again..... doh.gif
931002
post Dec 31 2008, 07:27 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(papaya2 @ Dec 31 2008, 04:57 PM)
toyota got new engine which is dual-VVTi engine but it does not bring in Malaysia. u go check toyota china wedsite see see.
although it got 4 AT speed but it equip with super ECT, somemore got 6 super ECT in other model sold in china.

dun always say toyota only stop their step on their old tech, the big organization does got new tech which we never know at the moment.

and dun simple say old tech/mind toyota customer in malaysia, u should know tech invent is NEVER end in human kind.

happy new year 2009!!! laugh.gif
*
For your info, Dual VVTI is just an additional unit of VVTI system installed on the other set of camshaft for DOHC engine (mean that both camshafts (intake and exhaust) has variable valve and timing) . There is nothing special about that. (Another tricks from Toyota) rclxms.gif . It is not a new technology at all. The dual VVTI system is not installed on a low to middle price car to cut cost. If you are not sure about the system go and ask people who know well about it. Dont just listen to the Toyota salesman.

Do you know what is ECT?. ECT stands for Electronic Control Transmission. Nowdays every car in the world use ECT or Electronic Control Transmission except for a very cheap car like Kancil (still use mechanical / hydraulic control). Even old proton Waja already use ECT for their gearbox. (Another trick from Toyota) rclxms.gif . My previous Accord (1987 model) already use ECT gearbox. Electronic control transmission (AKA ECT) is actualy a mechanical gearbox which is electronically controlled by ECU. By using this type of gearbox, engineer can easily program the gearbox operations by simply program the ECU according to the car and engine behaviour.
Again there is nothing special about ECT or Super ECT by Toyota, the only different is how the engineer programmed it. If you dont know or not sure, please ask the people who knows about it.

Think again.......
Happy new year!!!!!




931002
post Jan 1 2009, 08:39 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(papaya2 @ Jan 1 2009, 03:53 PM)
if like that dual-vvti also a new engine different frm vvti, u can say u believe, but other ppl also can believe theirself as well. seem that u make complaint 4AT, are 4AT cant ride on highway? or only need 5AT can ride on highway, some TS totally non-sence b4 say ppl non-sence..


Added on January 1, 2009, 3:59 pm
u r the one who non-sense and making post count bcoz u r totaly newbie, if ppl dun prefer 4AT why u can see Camry, Altis and even old vios/new vios on the road. think about it non-sense person mention the word of "non-sense" cool2.gif
*
people who prefer 4AT camry, altis, and vios are also non-sense and stubborn. they do not know how to choose between the good and the better.. rclxm9.gif

This post has been edited by 931002: Jan 1 2009, 08:47 PM
931002
post Jan 1 2009, 09:36 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jan 1 2009, 08:23 PM)
I wonder what is with all the Toyota bashing.

To those of you who's guilty of that - what are you so afraid of? Does it make your e-peen feel bigger when you put other brands down? You guys must really enjoy being Honda fanboys.

Saying dual VVTi as just another old technology is just like saying BMW's Twin Vanos system pointless or Mitsubishi's MIVEC system as just another cheap knock off. Every company is guilty of using some fancy acroymn as a marketing tool, do you think for a moment Honda is any less guilty of that?

Rightfully, each new generation should incorporate something new. It's not just UMW, Toyota is guilty of not implementing some of their newer stuff into most of Asia, but that still does not stop them from putting out a reliable product which people are still buying. They also use 4AT as compared to Honda's 5AT, but I'm sure they must have done their market research and if they cut cost here - nobody is forcing you to buy their products. Truth be known, how many of you peeps actually take your car out on the track? And how much power do you think you can harness on the roads of KL or on a normal street? Don't kid yourself thinking you're going to leave other people in the dust. In fact by driving recklessly, you're just being a menace to the drivers around you.

Honda's strength has always been on styling and giving their customers a powerful engine. Their cars are also known for good handling but otherwise, they have always fallen short on NVH, comfort and argubly image. Go look at the official state cars around the world (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Official_state_car), most of which are dominated by BMW, Mercedes, Volvo, Audi, Nissan and even Toyota/Lexus, so why are they not more prominently featured for official use? Does that mean they are any less of a brand?

The new Honda City is the most class leading car available on the market today. Being the latest entry in the B-segment market, why should you expect anything less from Honda? I'm would be surprised if they didn't.

Honda is a very good car brand, but it is not the best car brand. If you limit yourself thinking that way, the person who loses out most is going to be you. Seriously, it's time to get back talking about the City.
*
To make a good NVH car, is very simple. All you need is to use soft spring, soft shocks, soft bushing, soft body, soft tire and a lot of sound proofing material. Do you think mitsubishi evo is a silent car? or mitsubishi don't know how to make a silent car? or only toyota knows how to make a silent car?. The design of any car is a compromise between a good handling, ride comfort, and cost. Any car maker can make a good NVH car with good handling, it just a matter of how you want the car to be an how much you are going to sell it. If a car maker want to make good NVH and good handling car in one package they have to use additional systems such as air suspension, auto adaptive shock absorber and some other thing which will make the car more expensive. Toyota's tricks is to use soft spring (easily sag when fully loaded / high body roll), soft bushing (poor handling / poor straight line stability / shorten bushing life), soft shock absorber (high body roll, bumpy) and a lot of sound proofing material (which is cheaper option) to most of their car just to attract buyers and most of Toyota buyers think that the Toyota suspension is the best.



Think again........ thumbup.gif


931002
post Jan 1 2009, 11:34 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(linkokkeen @ Jan 1 2009, 09:49 PM)
u all argue for wat, i also dont understand, this things already happening and discuss for soooo many years already and stll have stupid fellow to discuss for this no answer things ha.

who really care abt the new tech now, got money go for BMW, Merz or even Lexus or Jaguar or europe car lah or Mini Cooper lah.

No money then got for cheaper version loh, nissan, honda, toyota, is up to ur taste lah.

Im a toyota fans but i didnt say honda is not good, even i also ask my mom go buy honda city, coz it is really nice and big car and she also have money to buy this car.

me no money so buy myvi drive lah.
if got little money and have budget ,im will go for Altis or Camry heheheeheheh.
For my experience, toyota and honda car, toyota is more tahan lasak but now a day their design is suck already, so many design at japan but still choosing the ugly version to here hahahahahaha.
honda is really make a bif movement , not only the design even the accesories and also technology.
but one things both of them is same, interior material is suck and cheap really loook plastic type ahahahahahahhahah.

bro 931002, u dont say toyota suspension is not good oh, i can challenge tat toyota suspension is better then honda and nissan. u can compare honda city old version and vios old version, which one can tahan lasak. hahahahahahaahahahhaha.
*
For your info, city and vios use the same type of suspension (MacPherson strut), the only different is vios suspension is slightly softer than city, so there is no issue of which one is better or 'tahan lasak'. nod.gif But if you compare accord and camry suspension, both are totally different. Camry uses conventional MacPherson strut while accord uses more expensive DoubleWishbones suspension.

Think again.... icon_rolleyes.gif
931002
post Jan 2 2009, 11:51 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(zweimmk @ Jan 2 2009, 03:41 AM)
LOL, why are you talking about the Mitsu Evo or WRX or whatever sports car? You're barking up the wrong tree - it's obvious those car appeal to the sports crowd so quietness isn't something to really consider at all.

All these years, the competition could have mimiced Toyota's tactics but yet they haven't exactly been able to. Do you really think Toyota could not have done the Honda route as well? Come on. It's obvious they are pursuing different route to appeal to different customers and at the end of the day, nobody is pointing a gun to your head to force you to buy their car. They didn't get to where they are by being sloppy either. Otherwise, did you think they would have stayed in profit for 70 years and overtake GM? You harp endlessly about how their cars are so bad but yet people still buy their cars - so obviously you must have very acquired taste or the general population is just making a bad choice.

Whatever floats your boat my friend thumbup.gif
*
Number of car sold per year is not a true indications of whether the company is good car maker. Proton / perodua is selling a lot as well in Malaysia. Do you think that BM, Merc or Ferrari is a bad company even though the number of car they can sell per year is less?. Toyota offer a wide range of vehicle in Malaysia (Vios, Avanza, Altis, Inova, camry, Hilux, Wish, Rush, Estima, Alphard and many more model). Compare to Honda, the vehicle they offered is very limited. Honda never produce low quality vehicle. Commercialy Toyota is a good company, they know how make vehicle that can sell well. the only thing is they not always offering you a good value for money vehicle (especialy on the low and medium range vehicle in Malaysia e.g Vios, Avanza, Inova, Altis and Camry). Toyota always use a dfferent strategy to attract buyers eg. they offer lether seat, sidemirror with signal light, LED light, a lot of compartment, chrome and wood finisher and some others things which is cheaper but they always refused to offer you a latest engine, suspension, transmission, body design and some others. Honda always offer you the best in technology to date vehicle compare to Toyota in same range of vehicle.

This is the fact. Nobody is going to force you whether you like Honda or Toyota.

Think again..............
931002
post Jan 2 2009, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(papaya2 @ Jan 2 2009, 05:40 PM)
1st , i step in here to express this CT after test drive, not barge any bad things, only say a bit less power than vios (starting up pick up). Overall better than vios.

2nd, some1 fellow said vios is not DBW, i claim that actually both car got DBW (not believe go both showroom check the pedal acceralator), then he disappear w/o admit and saying anythings.

3nd, some bargers coming up saying that toyota consumers are old tech/mind even claim that dual-vvti is the old tech engine - maybe he/she is the eager honda i-vtec engine in their life only w/o knowing further beyong the world.

4rd, more worst coming, barge high range toyota car such as camry with its design, low quality, old tech, suck suspension, not worth for money and etc... pls la, if u think Accord is the best one, keep it in yr heart enuf, not need barge camry until not worth even 1 cent. notworthy.gif

at the begining, i've said i love both japanese car (i only dun like home made car because they got gov protect - we hv to pay more tax on other cars), after keep reading, seem that barge toyota car more worst than barge honda car with ever include some eager language.  sweat.gif
*
Its all depends on you whether you want to pay more on chrome finished, wooden finished, leather seat, LED tail light, side mirror with signal, or you want to pay more for a better engine, better transmission, better suspension and styling....

I just want to tell the fact between the two brands. Thats all. Anyway this is just a discussions, if you feel right just take it, if not just leave it.


931002
post Jan 3 2009, 01:20 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(931002 @ Jan 2 2009, 11:08 PM)
Its all depends on you whether you want to pay more on chrome finished, wooden finished, leather seat, LED tail light, side mirror with signal, or you want to pay more for a better engine, better transmission, better suspension and styling....

I just want to tell the fact between the two brands. Thats all. Anyway this is just a discussions, if you feel right just take it, if not just leave it.
*
QUOTE(mikelee @ Jan 2 2009, 11:12 PM)
If that way, I think both combination of lock is the best. Steering lock I guess "StopLock" is recommended and break lock should be "Locktech".
*
This post has been edited by 931002: Jan 3 2009, 01:30 AM
931002
post Jan 3 2009, 01:31 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Just for your info....

Variable valve timing and lift technology.

Variable valve timing = to get more torque
Variable valve lift = to get more horse power


HONDA. (1983)
VTEC = Variable valve lift control
i-VTEC = intelligent + Variable valve timing + variable valve lift + variable valve phasing
SOHC VTEC-E = Variable valve lift control to increase fuel economy
SOHC VTEC = variable valve lift on both intake and exhaust valves
3 stage VTEC = SOHC VTEC-E + SOHC VTEC
i-VTEC I = Ultra lean i-VTEC to futher increase fuel economy
Advance i-VTEC = Intelligent + Continuously variable valve lift + timing control + continuously variable phase control

TOYOTA. (1991)
VVT = 2 stage variable valve timing
VVTI = intelligent + variable valve timing only
Dual VVTI = intelligent + variable valve timing on both intake and exhaust
VVTL-I = intelligent + Variable valve timing + variable valve lift (ceased production - does not meet Euro IV emissions requirement)


MITSUBISHI. (1992)
MIVEC = Variable valve timing + variable valve lift on intake valve only
Dual MIVEC = Variable valve timing + variable valve lift on intake and exhaust

MAZDA.
S-VT = Variable valve timing on intake valve only

NISSAN. (1986)
NVSC = Variable valve timing on intake valve only
VVL = Variable valve timing + variable valve lift + variable valve phasing

BMW. (1992)
VANOS = Variable valve timing on intake valve
Double VANOS = Variable valve timing on intake and exhaust valve
Valvetronic = Variable valve lift

MERCEDES
VVT = Variable valve timing on both intake and exhaust valve


Similar System.
Intelligent + Variable valve timing + variable valve lift + variable valve phasing
(Honda I-VTEC) = (Toyota VVTL-I) = (Mitsubishi MIVEC) = (Nissan VVL) = (BMW VANOS + Valvetronic)

Intelligent + Variable valve timing only
(Honda n/a) = (Toyota VVTI) = (Mitsubishi n/a) = (Nissan NVSC) = (BMW VANOS) = (Mercedes VVT) = (Mazda S-VT)

rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by 931002: Jan 3 2009, 01:47 AM
931002
post Jan 3 2009, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
0 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(andrekua @ Jan 3 2009, 10:51 AM)
Crap, still going with Toyota vs Honda arguments?

All these bullshit with newer engine, newer transmission bla bla bla. Dont you ever get boring? Since when these 5speed auto transmission gets newer than CVT in the old city? Use your dead brain to think twice before posting bullshits.

And please stop comparing their latest invention as THIS ALSO HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE NEW CITY!!!


Added on January 3, 2009, 10:54 am
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Are you doing it for the LOLs?

Get over it... engineer wannabe...
*
Anyway, Dugong will be one of the next endangered species soon.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0451sec    0.63    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 07:57 PM