QUOTE(JJ91 @ Aug 10 2009, 11:39 PM)
Preferences-->Advanced -->bt.transp_disposition 15 CHANGE to *10TQ.
New uTorrent 1.9/2.0 client bypasses throttling, uTorrent 2.0 RC2 is out!
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 07:12 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
99 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Terengganu. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 08:52 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,558 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: HornBill Borneo |
well...what can i say...uTor!!!! DID IT AGAIN!!!
This post has been edited by miahahaha: Aug 11 2009, 08:52 AM |
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 06:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
611 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: http://127.0.0.1:80/announce |
beta 2 give my speed back
using 1.9.x beta and speed like crap thanks to TS for latest i nfo |
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 07:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,471 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 07:49 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,649 posts Joined: Aug 2008 From: Tāmaki Makaurau |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2009, 10:38 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Jun 2009 |
I never even port forward although I have a router at home. uTorrent is showing the red dot.
But my speed? I can consistently hit 120kb/s on just one file. Cheers to 2.0! |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 12 2009, 02:44 PM
|
|
Moderator
1,874 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: KUL, MY |
I'm getting a "windows ran out of memory" Unable to allocate -48 bytes.
Apparently its a common problem. Its all over the official boards... http://forum.utorrent.com/viewtopic.php?id=60602&p=5 |
|
|
Aug 17 2009, 01:51 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
666 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Klang |
finally decided to change to uT from bit comet. my downloads are flyin (well around 40 - 50kbps ave) but at least m reli satisfied as compare to my bit comet last time.
i was wondering, is there any other tweaks to increase my speed? i know this had been asked, but besides the 'bt.transp_disposition' (previous poster), perhaps is there tweaks like... wat is the upload speed most recommended n stuff.. been a bit torrent user quite long, but..knowledge about it? --> close to none. thx |
|
|
Aug 17 2009, 04:50 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
11 posts Joined: Apr 2009 |
I think it is not such a great idea to BT 24/7 when there are internet issues affecting everyone.
The mentality is I want what I paid for. If everyone got what they paid for, nobody would have internet because there isn't enough bandwidth. All of the routers and switches would be overloading, and everyone would have 100% packet loss. Just my opinion. |
|
|
Aug 17 2009, 03:06 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,470 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
@mhane
I do very casual downloads but even that is very slow at 1kbps to 9 kbps ...... Your assumption would be people are able to torrent at all. This isn't the case as tmnut has become the big brother of the malaysian internet. Everything throttled to death. So nevermind about your scenario where people are able to p2p. The reality in Malaysia is we can't P2P period since it's throttled too much. I'd be more worried about the following: 1. poor download/upload speeds and latency especially for international destinations 2. massive packet loss. Totally unacceptable. 3. over throttling to the point that things like streaming and p2p is just a shitty experience 4. poor customer service. Always customers fault, and always act as if all their customers are ignorant. Never honest with their issues and always pass us on to someone else to the point that our case gets lost somewhere and finally resolved without us knowing about it. This post has been edited by Moogle Stiltzkin: Aug 17 2009, 03:11 PM |
|
|
Aug 18 2009, 11:46 AM
|
|
Elite
195 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(mhaneline @ Aug 17 2009, 04:50 AM) I think it is not such a great idea to BT 24/7 when there are internet issues affecting everyone. Fish seem to like to eat TMnet's cables The mentality is I want what I paid for. If everyone got what they paid for, nobody would have internet because there isn't enough bandwidth. All of the routers and switches would be overloading, and everyone would have 100% packet loss. Just my opinion. /s This post has been edited by rizvanrp: Aug 18 2009, 11:47 AM |
|
|
Aug 18 2009, 05:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,470 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Ok i installed the new utorrent beta. My download now is 100 Kb/s ....
1mb download is 120 kb/s ? So 100 should be ok i guess -.-; |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 04:58 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
178 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 06:27 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
6 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
QUOTE(cgha @ Aug 11 2009, 07:12 AM) i found out one thing though, if you're haveing the - memory problem with 2.0 best to set this setting back to the defult 15. if not if you're streaming video or doing other thing utor will surly crash most of the time. |
|
|
Aug 19 2009, 07:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
834 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
Hmm.. I tweak it a little bit and it kept crashing on me
|
|
|
Aug 20 2009, 02:22 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
272 posts Joined: Feb 2005 |
QUOTE(littleman @ Aug 19 2009, 07:16 PM) Well ... i have changed the settings ... still the same .... 9kb to 10 ... fluctuating like mad ... i have also port forwarded both TCP and UDP .... i still think its a load of crap ... 100kb is over stating ...Added on August 20, 2009, 2:25 am QUOTE(cgha @ Aug 11 2009, 07:12 AM) this setting just made my connection worst ...This post has been edited by wenhui100: Aug 20 2009, 02:25 AM |
|
|
Aug 20 2009, 05:25 AM
|
|
Elite
195 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
QUOTE(wenhui100 @ Aug 20 2009, 02:22 AM) Well ... i have changed the settings ... still the same .... 9kb to 10 ... fluctuating like mad ... i have also port forwarded both TCP and UDP .... i still think its a load of crap ... 100kb is over stating ... Attached is a screenshot of my UT client on UTP-only mode on a private tracker without any VPN/tunneling service Added on August 20, 2009, 2:25 am this setting just made my connection worst ... What setting the trans_disposition to 10 does is make the client use UTP (unthrottled, UDP based connections) only. This is however, only compatible with utorrent >1.8.1 and bittorrent >6.x peers. In other words, lets say the torrent you're downloading has 100 peers and only 20 of them have utorrent/bittorrent.. if bt.trans_disposition is set to 10 you will only be able to connect to 20 of these clients. Your download speed will be subject to whatever they have set their upload to and the quality of their connection to your PC. If you really want to see if UTP is helping you bypass your throttle cap, get a well seeded torrent on a private tracker, set the trans_disp to 10 and test it out there. Check your speed per peer. As you can see in the attachment, all my peers have a [UTP] tag on it which means its a [UTP] connection and I'm downloading at >30KB/s for most of them. The reason why I don't recommend setting trans_disp to 15 (the default setting) is because TCP based torrent connections will be throttled no matter what. In a situation where your torrent has 100 peers, where only 2 of which are running clients compatible with UTP you may see faster speeds with this setting back at the default of 15. Why? You may be able to pull an unthrottled 5-10KB/s from each of these peers via UTP but the remainder 98 peers you could potentially connect to would give you an extra 0.5-1KB/s each. This method works best with private trackers where clients are using the latest UT client simply because of UTP protocol support any everyone wanting to seed data.. for public torrents it can go either way. In a public tracker, who gives a **** about seeding? There's no penalty for capping your upload or not seeding at all.. so testing public tracker torrents to see if this works/doesn't work is not a good idea. It also depends on your own line.. who knows how TMnet implements their filter right? Regarding application stability, this is a BETA build of the UT client. I can run mine fine for days but that depends on your own PC (hardware, operating system, software which may interrupt the application such as antivirus software.. etc.). So good luck with this and hopefully it works for you. I posted this information when I tested it out myself to help others.. so if it works/doesn't work for you please don't complain about it to me because its your own ISPs fault. Please don't call me a liar or say that I exaggerated figures because I can provide the proof + numbers any day This post has been edited by rizvanrp: Aug 20 2009, 05:48 AM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Aug 20 2009, 09:26 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
52 posts Joined: Jul 2009 |
Any1 can teach me how to port forward in Utorrent?
|
|
|
Aug 20 2009, 01:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,185 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Not Found |
nice. 2.0b testing now.
any idea what transfer cap for? This post has been edited by bo093: Aug 20 2009, 01:52 PM |
|
|
Aug 21 2009, 12:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
166 posts Joined: Jan 2008 |
ver 2.0b keep crashing
revert back to 1.9 anyone with same prob ? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0284sec
0.89
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 04:51 AM |