Stock market V19, Chit chat in the market
Stock market V19, Chit chat in the market
|
|
Dec 7 2008, 01:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
check in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 17 2008, 08:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
Wondering if the interbank rate in US reduce to 'a range between 0% to 0.25%', then if I am bank with extra money, I mah rather keep inside my safe and not loan to other bank, because loan to other banks also earn me nothing (0%), some more if the counter party go bust I also kena teruk. Anyone can advice on this?
|
|
|
Dec 17 2008, 09:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 17 2008, 03:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(eltaria @ Dec 17 2008, 03:38 PM) eh, just want to talk with u guys on MMC a bit. I think WM get Senai Airport from MAHB for years liao, initially want to turn into cargo hub to compete with Changi, later no news. So what will investors' perception for the Iskandar Malaysia to Senai Airport? And during the years, Changi had expand, KLIA had expand while Senai masih tidur lagi... I'd see potential for the SATS deal to be a good one, seeing as that'll be the entry gate to Iskander, legoland and etc. However, the only problem with it is.... Iskander, legoland et all is like 6 years++ away....... if you're looking at really long term prospects, it'll be a good buy is it not? |
|
|
Dec 17 2008, 05:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(eltaria @ Dec 17 2008, 04:11 PM) PTP did manage to get a lot of singapores' shipping. If they able to do that, they should have done that long ago loh, but even KLIA also cannot snap customers from CA, SAT? Wonder if they can do the same with sats or not. Anyway, what will happen with the deal, if the shareholders vote against it? -Also, it's estimated MMC will sell 1/5 of their stake in PTP to buy off SATS, this will mean a 20% reduction of profit from ptp. how large is ptp's profit contributing to MMC's net profit? The reduction in EPS, give it worst case, 20% reduction... (lazy man's assumption of PTP being 100% MMC's profit.. so -20%) the share price have pummelled like 50% off its prior SATS news.. To me, that's like selling off a cash cow and buy a black hole Just my 2 cents. |
|
|
Dec 17 2008, 05:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(eltaria @ Dec 17 2008, 05:28 PM) Well, if Iskandar corridor were to be anywhere near the success the government planned for it, at the heart of it must have a good airport. But actually I don't think it's going anywhere, most of the investment on properties sector, r&d & logistic not seen to come until now. The only thing can be seen is the new CIQ, which can be use to train next generation F1 drivers with the narrow winding flyover. Legoland? Don't think can draw much tourist either. I think that's another wawasan. |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2008, 08:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 08:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 08:39 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 04:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 05:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 30 2008, 10:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Dec 31 2008, 04:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 1 2009, 04:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(kmarc @ Jan 1 2009, 04:03 PM) Noob question (sorry ya Boh lah, multiply to paid up capital.The worst is yet to come : http://biz.thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?f...46&sec=business |
|
|
Jan 4 2009, 08:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Jan 4 2009, 05:13 PM) I don't know about this stock, but from the statement straight away I can pin-point out the contradicted statement within as bolded. Maybe they mean earning growth might reduce to 19% annually from 25% previously predicted? Just my wild guess only.As the research house is viewing it won't be affected too largely due to secured contract and earning gorwth expected to continue, then why lower the target price? Because market price goes down, so lower it so that it is achievable?? You only downgraded a stock and target price when future is bleak which you see earning is going to drop. If you see earning is going to rise, it is doesn't make sense to lower the target price. Don't mean to recommend anything, nor saying the research is good or not, just pointed out the illogical part. |
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 08:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 10:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 11:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(fergie1100 @ Jan 9 2009, 10:34 AM) Banking sector's financial statement is one of the most complicated Maybe they start early (doing groundwork before closing, save them critical time). |
|
|
Jan 9 2009, 11:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
QUOTE(cherroy @ Jan 9 2009, 11:28 AM) May be because nowadays, transaction is fully computerised and system also are quite integrated. So just matter of few dozen click to summarise out the financial statement and need to be manually verified only. For bank, a lot of things are judgmental one, system can help but human touch still required, especially in big and complex organization involving multiple countries. But the speed is truly amazing, maybe we need some insider to explain to us how they make it. But still, reporting after 2 weeks time Q ended, is very efficienct indeed. |
|
|
Jan 10 2009, 07:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,305 posts Joined: Sep 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0479sec
0.31
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 03:59 AM |