Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD/ATI Radeon HD 4000 Series Discussion V5, The Journey Countinues..

views
     
ReeNz
post Nov 29 2008, 06:00 PM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



Crysis is really a heavy game..4870 can handle almost all games at fullest on 1680 x 1050, but when it comes to crysis warhead (gamer setting), sometimes it will go down to 28-30fps..average is around 35-40 fps though..depending on which part of the game..highest i got is around 50..

This post has been edited by ReeNz: Nov 29 2008, 06:01 PM
ReeNz
post Feb 21 2009, 10:46 AM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



Juz trying catalyst 9.2..a little improvement in 3dmark vantage from 9.1 (10658 vs 10626) and 2 fps average increase on gtaIV benchmark (1680x1050, very high: 47fps vs 45fps)
ReeNz
post Feb 23 2009, 01:47 PM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



looks like a lot of downsides for the new catalyst..but so far i'm having no prob at all..but im not playing farcry 2 so i cant comment on that..however BIA2, GTA4, fallout3, COD5 and deadspace are running good..
ReeNz
post Mar 19 2009, 05:22 AM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



QUOTE(tech3910 @ Mar 19 2009, 02:16 AM)
dis is a shy since my previous heavily OC 4870 @ 870/950 also can do 10xxx score.
*
I agree with you bro..i can hit 10200+ at 800/4000 oni..max i got around 10600 (only one time, dunno why)..but let see the real performance in gaming..

And cant wait to try Cat 9.3 too biggrin.gif

edited: Just installed Cat 9.3 and ran 3dmark vantage 3 times. I got an average of 10780. Here are the results:

1st - 10779
2nd - 10774
3rd - 10786

Based on this result, kinda like this new Catalyst more than 9.2, where I only managed to get 10600+ max (only one time: first time) and the rest are around 10200-10400, which are totally not stable.

user posted image

This post has been edited by ReeNz: Mar 19 2009, 09:29 AM
ReeNz
post Mar 19 2009, 10:52 AM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



but the cpu score is already way more then my OC'ed 9550..but you are right, we need to wait for proper and reliable reviews..
ReeNz
post Mar 20 2009, 05:30 AM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



QUOTE(sonic_cd @ Mar 20 2009, 02:56 AM)
could be combination of different system specs . gua ?
*
maybe..i oso dun hav any prob since buying my card back in Nov..of course there were game crashes and bsods before, but they were caused by my unstable oc..btw does anyone here CF 4870 1gb with 650w psu? im thinking to get another piece of card but dun wanna upgrade my psu..no cash sad.gif
ReeNz
post Mar 20 2009, 03:20 PM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



QUOTE(sevensigns @ Mar 20 2009, 01:40 PM)
im happy so far because fear 2.can play.Haha.very enjoy using a new driver..
*
U cant play FEAR 2 with previous drivers? Never tried the full game but demo seems ok with 9.1 and 9.2..
ReeNz
post Mar 22 2009, 12:17 PM

Glory Glory!
******
Senior Member
1,467 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Petaling Jaya/Melaka/USA



QUOTE(TomatomanzSeedlezz @ Mar 21 2009, 05:35 PM)
Well, the last i heard GTA4 its more to CPU dependent compared to GPU.

So, no point getting super-duper-hi-end videocard when ur using low-end cpu (not to mention bottleneck).

Cheers tongue.gif
*
True, but even with 1GB card u still cant max out one or two settings coz out of memory already..no matter how fast ur cpu is.

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0377sec    0.69    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 05:29 AM