Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 PC or PS3?, Help me to select the above

views
     
Cheesenium
post Nov 28 2008, 12:50 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
It's just a wrong place to ask.If you ask at PC section,most of us will say PC.The console section forumer will say PS3 or XBox 360.

PC for me.RTS dont work with game pad.
Cheesenium
post Nov 28 2008, 01:54 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 28 2008, 01:37 AM)
there were people telling me how playable RTS like C&C:TW was on Xbox360.

but that's just C&C la. tongue.gif RTS and gamepad is a lousy combo.
*
It might work for games like TW or even RA3 but it will definitely wont play RTS like Sup Com,CoH,Rome:Total War,DoW etc.I think games with complex strategies wont work on a console because of the gamepad.It's not flexible enough.

Besides,360's C&C3:TW only support 4 players and have much smaller maps.Some of the gameplay modes wont even work on PC.

Do correct me if im wrong.
Cheesenium
post Nov 28 2008, 02:00 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(prinny101 @ Nov 28 2008, 01:58 AM)
Using voice command like end war. Thats next gen experience for RTS console C:
*
Yeah,but it will still limited to small scale combat.How would you manage a large army in games like Sup Com or micro a few tanks in CoH with your voice and a gamepad ?
Cheesenium
post Nov 28 2008, 02:06 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(prinny101 @ Nov 28 2008, 02:05 AM)
RTS is best for PC, no doubts. I'm just saying RTS on console should prefer to be played with voice commands, but in a smaller scale battle.
*
Definitely,RTS are made for PC,not consoles.
Cheesenium
post Nov 28 2008, 03:13 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 28 2008, 02:08 AM)
i can't imagine playing SupCom on consoles.
*
I dont want to play any RTS on consoles.

I played UaW and it just feels so wrong.The army is so small and it just dont feel RTS enough for me.

QUOTE(MYKidd @ Nov 28 2008, 03:50 AM)
Yea, but sometimes it kinda sucks that you know you're not playing to the max capacity the game can give.  tongue.gif
*
Still,most of the time,the max setting and high setting have very difference in visual quality.

Med-High is good enough for me,as long as i get to see all the eye candies.

QUOTE(jenniferjen @ Nov 28 2008, 09:37 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
If you are noob in adjusting for performance,you can come here to ask for some help on tweaking the game.

I do think that you should get a PC,as you like RTS games and keyboard/mouse controls.If not,get a mid range 2k com when SC2 or D3 release and get a PS3 now to play PS3 games.There isnt much nice RTS coming out soon,other than DoW2 and Empire:Total War.SC2,dunno when.Very little info now.

Anyway,please support ori.Less hassle,more fun.
Cheesenium
post Nov 28 2008, 03:23 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(goldfries @ Nov 28 2008, 03:17 PM)
most RTS you don't have time to enjoy eye-candy until either

a) you're watching a slow crumbling of your opponent.

b) you're watching a slow crumbling of yourself tongue.gif

c) you and your opponent are those that like to sit back, defend kau kau super kau kau and barely not even initiating attacks.

haha.
*
Haha,damn true.

RA3's water effects are damn distracting.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0182sec    0.48    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 03:41 AM