mind to post up ur 9800gtx+ sli and 4870x2 3dmark screenshot?
Lower 3dMark06 score with 4870x2, QX9650 o.c to 3.7ghz
Lower 3dMark06 score with 4870x2, QX9650 o.c to 3.7ghz
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 03:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,857 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: ocdrift.com |
mind to post up ur 9800gtx+ sli and 4870x2 3dmark screenshot?
|
|
|
Nov 2 2008, 07:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,857 posts Joined: Sep 2004 From: ocdrift.com |
QUOTE(pyangaox @ Nov 2 2008, 07:09 PM) sorry for my late reply i ve format my pc several time nw here ..for the driver ive use 8.5 , 8.8 , 8.10 still the same ..had to use vista ultimate 64bit to run it perfect but also not as good as 9800gtx+ here the screen shot... 3dmark 06 uses dual core when processing graphic test especially sm2,when u r using better card than 3870x2 and sm2 around 8-9k/sm3 around 10k at 4ghz or below regardless dual/ quad core,the proc starting bottleneck ur vga performance» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i had to clock to 3.8 to get 20k MMmmm....btw i use win xp the performance sooo weak .. about 70percent performance lost ...but if use vista 64 its normal ...is it the driver conflict or what.. Added on November 2, 2008, 7:13 pm yes bro ive monitor myg.c temp its ok hehe btw i put extra fan on top of my x2. above statement is concluded when im testing ati card,not too sure for nvidia yet ![]() ![]() 4.5GHz dual core 3870 CF 905/1351 vs 4.3GHz quad core 3870 CF 972/1310 sm2 and sm3 are higher in dual core setup how much sm2/sm3 increment before and after u bump ur cpu clock? |
| Change to: | 0.0144sec
0.63
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 06:40 PM |