Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Lower 3dMark06 score with 4870x2, QX9650 o.c to 3.7ghz

views
     
coolice
post Nov 2 2008, 03:42 AM

Team OCD!
******
Senior Member
1,857 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: ocdrift.com


mind to post up ur 9800gtx+ sli and 4870x2 3dmark screenshot?
coolice
post Nov 2 2008, 07:32 PM

Team OCD!
******
Senior Member
1,857 posts

Joined: Sep 2004
From: ocdrift.com


QUOTE(pyangaox @ Nov 2 2008, 07:09 PM)
sorry for my late reply i ve format my pc several time nw here ..for the driver ive use 8.5 , 8.8 , 8.10 still the same ..had to use vista ultimate 64bit to run it perfect but also not as good as 9800gtx+ here the screen shot... cry.gif

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


i had to clock to 3.8 to get 20k MMmmm....btw i use win xp the performance sooo weak .. about 70percent performance lost ...but if use vista 64 its normal ...is it the driver conflict or what.. rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif  thx sifoo for tryin to help me ... but im still not satisfied... does this really the best graphic card on planet ???????


Added on November 2, 2008, 7:13 pm

yes bro ive monitor myg.c temp its ok hehe btw i put extra fan on top of my x2.
*
3dmark 06 uses dual core when processing graphic test especially sm2,when u r using better card than 3870x2 and sm2 around 8-9k/sm3 around 10k at 4ghz or below regardless dual/ quad core,the proc starting bottleneck ur vga performance

above statement is concluded when im testing ati card,not too sure for nvidia yet


user posted image

user posted image

4.5GHz dual core 3870 CF 905/1351 vs 4.3GHz quad core 3870 CF 972/1310
sm2 and sm3 are higher in dual core setup

how much sm2/sm3 increment before and after u bump ur cpu clock?

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0144sec    0.63    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 06:40 PM