Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Why the rant about exclusives?, ExClusives only for xbox360,ps3, etc etc

views
     
technophile
post Oct 28 2008, 06:10 PM

@techsupremo
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Anfield



QUOTE(JPlaSMaY666 @ Oct 28 2008, 04:32 PM)
Hi all, i've just been browsing through the forums coz i'm quite free nowadays. And i've tend to come alot quite a number of threads lamenting the loss of an exclusive title for another platform for example 'Final Fantasy 13' which is coming out on both the PS3 and XBOX360. My Question would be..why the unhappiness or uneasiness just because the game company chooses to release the game on another platform so others can enjoy them? Is there a need for hostility or bitterness because of the loss of a 'so called exclusive' to another gaming console? I feel we have become too attached with our affliations to our respective consoles that whenever we see an exclusive title being marketed on another console,we feel a tinge of jealousy or whatnot..shouldnt we b happy as gamers that other console gamers are able to enjoy the game just as much as us?

or is there a reason that is stirring up the unhappiness?i would like to know your thoughts on the subject..i'm not trying to point fingers on anyone but i would just like to understand the frustrations if there is any when it comes to the loss of an exclusive title to a rival console.peace out icon_rolleyes.gif
*
fanboy-ism.

i for one would gladly be happy if Halo, Fable and Gears of War goes to PS3. so that my friends who owns a PS3 can understand why i locked myself inside the room last weekend trying to experience Fable II. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by technophile: Oct 28 2008, 06:10 PM
technophile
post Oct 31 2008, 05:44 PM

@techsupremo
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Anfield



QUOTE(jackhammer84 @ Oct 31 2008, 05:03 PM)
well, coz it's basically a port. those games are originally developed for the 360 as the lead development platform and then ported to the ps3. there are bound to be irregularities appearing when the game is ported, different architecture. so you'll obviously see more bugs/slow framerate/etc in ps3, coz of the simple fact that it was originally developed for the 360 first

but we'll be seeing more developers using the ps3 as lead development in multiplatform games in the coming months, so we'll see how that turns out.

anyways, i'm all for multiplatform. fallout3 used 360 as lead. but that ain't stopping me from getting the ps3 version, despite the bugs smile.gif
*
care to elaborate? as far as i know, only FF13 is being developed on PS3 as the lead platform.
devs are still complaining about the difficulties in producing a multi plat games with PS3 as the lead platform till today.

simple fact is : CELL is a powerful processor. yes, i admit that. but the architecture around it (256 RAM, bottlenecks, bluray transfer data) is killing the possibilities of the machine to be exploited thoroughly. to explore everything needs time and with the turnaround time of development nowadays (which is 2 years max), most development house do not want to spend their time and resources trying to get the most out of PS3. thus why they opted to develop in a dev-friendly toolset provided by MS.

i just realised that i sound OT. sorry. tongue.gif
technophile
post Nov 1 2008, 01:13 AM

@techsupremo
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Anfield



QUOTE(aiyish @ Nov 1 2008, 12:28 AM)
Lagging behind?? lag what?? The devs aint tapped into the full horsepower of the ps3 yet. Even the PS2 needs almost 4 years before dominating the console market. And the result aren't the same. The PS3 has improved a lot since they launch their console. The PSN is getting better, and better games are heading to the ps3. As the 360 heading out in maybe a couple of years, the ps3 is best bet for future gaming. do some research, the ps3 sales are doing well after the released of MGS4 and the price cut. Actually, it has increase over 192% this year. So the results is not the same

No, i may sound like a fanboy but im not. I owned 3 consoles (at least 2 coz my 360 died on me again).
*
if 360 is heading out in the near future, sony SHOULD be worried then. obviously the next gen of xbox will feature better graphics and better specs. so in a way PS3 suddenly became obsolete. does sony afford to play catch up again?

read around the net. PS3 is not as powerful as sony wants you to believe. it is only comparable with the 360. that is the fact. and i know it's hard to swallow. but it's the reality.

like someone said here, it's about their investment and how that investment should be justified. well, they got cheated by sony's marketing. and sony didn't deliver what they promised.

remember when ps2 was about to come out? how they said it can do FMV quality graphics in real time? it's 2008 now.. i didn't see it yet from that machine.

remember when ps3 was about to come out, they played the killzone trailer and looks like it beats everything in terms of graphic and detail? tell me now, since killzone is about to be released soon, did it feature that kinda graphic?

i refuse to answer the obvious.
technophile
post Nov 1 2008, 01:21 AM

@techsupremo
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Anfield



QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Nov 1 2008, 01:19 AM)
well actually,it's fairly close if not better than that trailer.

not just graphically,ofcourse.
but movement of the characters and such.

it's remarkable they got anywhere near that 2k5 trailer
*
LOL!
dude.. you are so in denial!!!

read back what you wrote.. you are so contradicting..

and i was talking about graphics.. since we are on the topic of console's horsepower.

This post has been edited by technophile: Nov 1 2008, 01:23 AM
technophile
post Nov 1 2008, 01:38 AM

@techsupremo
****
Senior Member
580 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Anfield



QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Nov 1 2008, 01:23 AM)
right.
you're welcome to form your own opinion on the matter,but it looks pretty close to me.
user posted image


Added on November 1, 2008, 1:32 am
contradicting?how so?

horsepower is more than just powering pretty graphics.
*
most fanboys arguments is around how horsepower relation to pretty graphics.
in fact, ppl here are talking about the "untapped" power of PS3. to do what? making your coffee? iron your clothes?
it's obvious they are talking about graphics rite?

anyway those killzone trailer screens are on low res and blurry compared to the killzone 2 screen grabs.
try comparing it against higher definition trailer and you'll get what i mean.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0169sec    0.27    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 12:40 PM