QUOTE(angelic-x @ Oct 19 2008, 01:25 AM)
winrar is good WinRAR vs 7zip
WinRAR vs 7zip
|
|
Nov 8 2008, 12:00 PM
|
![]()
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 8 2008, 03:51 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
517 posts Joined: Aug 2007 From: Melaka |
I've recently switched to 7zip because it is free and consume less memory. The downside is only that its icons are extremely ugly, i'll have to manually change the icons for .rar, .zip, .iso, and .7z to prevent myself from uninstalling it immediately after seeing all those ugly Win 98 style icons sitting all around my laptop.
Being unable to compress files in .rar format isn't a problem for me at all. |
|
|
Nov 8 2008, 04:04 PM
|
|
Moderator
9,277 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said |
Well I prefer to use winrar as while it has the advantage of reading every compression method out there, my image viewer supports reading data from .rar compilation, thus I can save quite a lot of space by compressing my image files. While 7z has better compression ratio, no image viewer can directly read images from it's archive, thus I don't really have any use for it.
|
|
|
Nov 8 2008, 09:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
271 posts Joined: Oct 2005 |
I use Winrar. Admittedly its program icon can be ugly as a goatse fug, but thankfully XPize took care of that.
|
|
|
Nov 9 2008, 04:56 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,308 posts Joined: Jul 2007 |
winrar rarararaaarrrrwwarwwwararwwww
|
|
|
Nov 11 2008, 10:47 AM
|
![]()
Junior Member
21 posts Joined: Nov 2008 |
winrar ftw. been using it for many years. neva fail me.
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0157sec
0.81
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 11:33 PM |