no problem ........
C n C welcm ...hihihi

Canon 1000D kit
Exif refer my old post

---

Added on November 8, 2008, 9:15 pmThink he just gaussian blur the background....that's y the fit n the bg look unmerge n un natural .....

This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 9 2008, 02:05 AM

Old shot .....
Canon 1000D kit
1/25 sec
F10
ISO200

Some shot at cameron highland
Canon 1000D
Kit lens

R u pp it ?
look like sharpen alot till noisy come out.......
ISO 200 with lot of noise,
correct me if i'm wrong.....

this would be nice......natural colour n nice contrast between white n yellow...
but wondering y the bird didnt fly away when u get close?

nowadays seldom see sifus posting geh .......
no more L lens poison ........

Hohohoho.....long ime no spam
so satu kali hantam gao gao ....

Few shot from dog show at ipoh

this shot is from a corner of the school,suddenly obtain it n snap it down....coz feel like oversea,white on the tree let it look like snow.......
n feel like at FUJISAN (personal feel)

Canon 1000D /1/320 sec / F13/ ISO 400 /

2 dog going 2 fight if no rope on them under a blue blue sky

Canon 1000D / 1/320sec / F5.6 / ISO 200 /


Canon 1000D / 1/60sec / F5.6 / ISO 100 /

can u belif this......wat a heavy makeup ......Guess wat dog is it?

Canon 1000D / 1/8sec / F4.5 / ISO 200 /

This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 14 2008, 11:04 PM

noob question here...
any sifus know close up filter can use on a tele lens or not?

Wah .....finally hv a sifu poison ppl .......
geng ....i like it ...
i saw some gd portrait shots with this lens 2,nice bokeh n sharpness.....
but my wallet not allow me 2 own it ~~~~

Oh ~~~

so which lens r u selling?
is it sp90 ? selling how much ? condition?

---

Added on November 15, 2008, 12:03 pmwah ~~~fix lens r....??
but i seldom shot portrait.....
actually just try 2 hv another lens 2 cover another shooting range ~~~ (only kit lens i hv)

This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 15 2008, 12:06 PM

Oh Oh .....sound like our big bro bunvirus wanna marah loh....

---

Added on November 17, 2008, 12:13 amDairy post 4 me

Canon 1000D wih kit lens
1/13 sec
F5
ISO 400


This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 17 2008, 12:13 AM

Is it oof on the flower or u purposely wanna 2 do that?
but the compo not really nice 2 play some dof .....

---

Added on November 19, 2008, 8:14 ampersonal idea......if it's macro shot,will abit of dull.
macro should be very rich in colour n every macro object will become bigger.....
anyway i like the compo that the folower build

---

Added on November 19, 2008, 8:30 amwoh ,i like the 1st pic ......something like painting.....
so r u enrich the colour in ps or original that the carl zeiss lens produce

---

Added on November 19, 2008, 8:33 amfew shots 2 share
C n C selcome

Canon 1000D kit lens
1/60sec
F9
ISO 200


Canon 1000D kit lens
1/400sec
F3.5
ISO 200


This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 19 2008, 08:46 PM

Base on ur shot,i didnt think the flower is more attactive then the fish in the river....
since u wan the flower 2 be the main object,then u better walk closer or zoom in, make the main object bigger n cover more space in ur viewfinder.....
use ur F2.8 lens to blur the background 2 outstanding ur object....
dun shot flower with normal eye level,it will be bored,
.....so try 2 lower ur camera n make some different angle that we normally cant see.....this will make ur object more intresting then u think.......
just my RM0.02 ......

---

Added on November 19, 2008, 9:14 pmCanon 1000D kit lens
1/25sec /F3.5 /ISO 100


This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 19 2008, 09:14 PM

Just like pcho said...
wat i can say is think b4 u shoot,think wat u wan 2 present......
wat u hv 2 do is look more about other ppl's pic learn it n try 2 apply n modifly it 2 ur own style.......

---

Added on November 19, 2008, 11:24 pmanother 1 4 me.....

Canon 1000D kit lens
1/125 sec /F8 /ISO 200
1)

Canon 1000D kit lens
1/200sec / F8 / ISO 200
2)



This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 19 2008, 11:40 PM

Oh ~~~that's right...
now i only notice ........
anyway ,thk pcho...

---

Added on November 20, 2008, 12:11 ammost important issue is ......1) is he using center af n recompose the shot?
2)handshake ?



This post has been edited by lek0010: Nov 20 2008, 12:11 AM

coz when u use big aperture,specially bigger then 2.8 n recompose the compo will always make the object oof or blur....

Here's my spam shot.....
lot of ppl dun follow the rules ......no exif 1.....
Canon 1000D kit lens
1/20sec /F5.6 /ISO 400

think he using center af n recompose the shot....
when he wide open his aperture n recompose will always make it oof,
better choose the af point as close as it can n move ur camera to recompose as little as u can 2 make ur shot clear n sharp ....

---

Added on December 2, 2008, 8:53 pmLong time no post at here ......
time 2 spam......

Canon 1000D kit lens
1/15 sec / EV+0.33 / F5.6 ? ISO 800
C n C is welcome


Canon 1000D kit lens
1/13sec / EV+0.33 / F4.5 / ISO 800


This post has been edited by lek0010: Dec 2 2008, 08:58 PM

thk Iwilliam....
i also use borrow my frend's 50mm 1.8 for fun,but seldom use,feeling not convenient when i wanna shoot in wide angle,still satisfly with my kit ....hihihi
actually IS in tele lens really important ?

[quote=avenger,Dec 2 2008, 10:41 PM]gfx snap



EXIF in picture edi

[/quote]

walau ~~~~ATI 9200SE .....64mb or 128mb?
at least 5 years ago,i hv 1 also,but not in my cpu now.......

---

Added on December 2, 2008, 11:10 pmCanon 1000D 50mm 1.8
1/250sec/ +3.3EV / F2 / ISO200

---

Added on December 2, 2008, 11:15 pm[quote=lwliam,Dec 2 2008, 10:49 PM]
in a way, IS in tele is MORE important than IS in wide angles. that is because when you zoom in tighter, smaller movements on the camera will be amplified in the image as motion blur. at wider angles, minor shakes are still tolerable till a certain extent.

true that 50mm is less convenient than your kit lens. but your kit lens will introduce more CA and have a much lower edge to edge sharpness to an image. if you are comfortable with moving around for framing, i'd go for the 50mm or the 28mm (which i am using now - also a reason why i didnt get the 50mm is because my images are usually more on the wide range - although, i envy those who have a 50mm most of the time).
It is if you're planning on using your telephoto for indoor events and stuff that involves less than optimal lighting.
If you're planning on taking your telephoto lens for daytime outdoor shots, IS would of course still be helpful, but less important

[/quote]

it depends on how expensive ur IS lens is.. on higher end models, there are 2 different type of IS. one is the regular up down left right shift IS, the other one is IS meant for panning, which means it doesnt bother the lateral motion of the lens, but it stabilizes the vertical motion, giving it a smoother panning result
its good you take advice and guides from elsewhere, everyone have to start somewhere. but sometimes it depends on your preference as well, after taking a shot, see if what u took (with correspond to the settings) feels pleasing to you. if not, tweak the settings again and try again. if yes, then good for you. it doesnt mean what settings other ppl use would give the same 'awesome-ness' effect to your pic. experiment a bit, when u get the looks that you like, rmb the settings that you use, the next time, u can roughly put in the same setting values and begin from there again, instead of going through all the setting/tweaking all over again.

one more thing, control the f-number accordingly to your subject. some things are more suited to narrow DOF, some would need a deeper one. one setting does not fit every subject.

[/quote]

thk ur explain ~~~~always appreciate u......share wat u hv n wat u know ~


This post has been edited by lek0010: Dec 2 2008, 11:15 PM