Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

16 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 The top five reasons why Windows Vista failed.

views
     
xelnamikaze
post Jan 29 2009, 09:16 PM

i ♥ to workout
******
Senior Member
1,892 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Jan 28 2009, 09:16 PM)
Why don't you let him compare Windows XP and Windows Vista without dressing up. What do you think the answer is?
What's wrong with that? Don't see it have something to do with drag-and-drop function though... hmm.gif
And Mac interface doesn't differs much from MacOS back then, only with added Dock, and probably another brushed up metal interface, and glowing 3D buttons. And Linux, it's just copying all other OS in the first place. Does Windows 95 even have Computer Management? hmm.gif
*
he knows what he's talking about brows.gif
FarCry3r
post Jan 29 2009, 09:47 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(xelnamikaze @ Jan 29 2009, 09:16 PM)
he knows what he's talking about  brows.gif
*
Anyone is welcomed to correct anything I've said if they think it's wrong and have proof to support it.
jem1004
post Jan 30 2009, 05:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


Anyway, it is up to the person either he/she want to use vista or not.
It is their choice.

QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Jan 26 2009, 05:23 PM)
Corrected your statement. DirectX11 will be available to both Windows Vista and Windows7, but not XP. So again, XP is ditched...
Thanks for correcting my statement.

FarCry3r
post Jan 30 2009, 07:43 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(jem1004 @ Jan 30 2009, 05:32 AM)
Anyway, it is up to the person either he/she want to use vista or not.
It is their choice.
Thanks for correcting my statement.
*
No problem icon_rolleyes.gif
FuiLo
post Feb 7 2009, 11:23 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Sandakan,Sabah


Quite interesting topic..i remember i saw one forumer siggy stated when window XP launched u say window XP sux, window 98 is better, when window vista launched u say vista sux and window xp is better sweat.gif ..all i want to say is it depends..I like Window Vista is only because of its GUI smile.gif

This post has been edited by FuiLo: Feb 7 2009, 11:23 PM
zubai
post Feb 8 2009, 12:47 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
347 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Kangar


QUOTE(FuiLo @ Feb 7 2009, 11:23 PM)
Quite interesting topic..i remember i saw one forumer siggy stated when window XP launched u say window XP sux, window 98 is better, when window vista launched u say vista sux and window xp is better sweat.gif ..all i want to say is it depends..I like Window Vista is only because of its GUI  smile.gif
*
Same here laugh.gif, the gui is nice. I used to hate Vista coz of its poor gaming performance.
SUSwilsonjay
post Feb 8 2009, 11:57 AM

6 Stars Social Justice Warrior
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


sooner or later uhave to change...
zubai
post Feb 13 2009, 12:05 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
347 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Kangar


Yup.. Now I'm already change to Win 7 Beta laugh.gif . Not bad for a Beta OS, not bad at all..
yip_man
post Feb 18 2009, 01:15 AM

[The Lagendary IP Man]
****
Senior Member
659 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: ★ Currently Away ★




Really hope Windows 7 dont have all this problem... Looking forward for this new OS soon...
yuktsi14
post Feb 18 2009, 03:17 AM

Gloomy Sunday
*******
Senior Member
2,585 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: Sibu, Sarawak



like the the aero theme
Liuteva
post Feb 18 2009, 07:42 AM

Empty.
*******
Senior Member
2,991 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor


Why aero theme failed?
twinkles
post Feb 18 2009, 11:42 AM

GOD behind You !
****
Senior Member
656 posts

Joined: Aug 2008



3. Vista is too slow this i agreed
solstice818
post Feb 18 2009, 08:14 PM

You'll Never Walk Alone
*******
Senior Member
4,503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: The Far Away Venus Status: Being Insua-fied


QUOTE(twinkles @ Feb 18 2009, 11:42 AM)
3. Vista is too slow this i agreed
*
Slow? It's running smoothly like normal window.(at least mine is running fast and smooth)The only reason why Vista is too slow in your computers is probably because you have a low ram because if I m not mistaken, Vista require more ram than XP.Don't blame the window.Blame your pc. rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by solstice818: Feb 18 2009, 08:15 PM
FarCry3r
post Feb 18 2009, 08:24 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(solstice818 @ Feb 18 2009, 08:14 PM)
Slow? It's running smoothly like normal window.(at least mine is running fast and smooth)The only reason why Vista is too slow in your computers is probably because you have a low ram because if I m not mistaken, Vista require more ram than XP.Don't blame the window.Blame your pc. rolleyes.gif
*
He should blame himself for foolishly trying to run Windows Vista on low specification PC. Wrong place at the wrong time, he is.
jem1004
post Feb 18 2009, 08:28 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


QUOTE(solstice818 @ Feb 18 2009, 08:14 PM)
Slow? It's running smoothly like normal window.(at least mine is running fast and smooth)The only reason why Vista is too slow in your computers is probably because you have a low ram because if I m not mistaken, Vista require more ram than XP.Don't blame the window.Blame your pc. rolleyes.gif
*
Actually it has nothing to do with ram.
512mb of ram can be consider enough (1gb is recomended).
The reason about it is the proceossor.
Pentium 4 or below will have a bit problem to run few process on vista.
You will get a bit slow especially running firefox, media player and torrent together.
That is just my point of view.

QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Feb 18 2009, 08:24 PM)
He should blame himself for foolishly trying to run Windows Vista on low specification PC. Wrong place at the wrong time, he is.
*
Opss. I post to late.

This post has been edited by jem1004: Feb 18 2009, 08:29 PM
solstice818
post Feb 18 2009, 09:31 PM

You'll Never Walk Alone
*******
Senior Member
4,503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: The Far Away Venus Status: Being Insua-fied


QUOTE(jem1004 @ Feb 18 2009, 08:28 PM)
Actually it has nothing to do with ram.
512mb of ram can be consider enough (1gb is recomended).
The reason about it is the proceossor.
Pentium 4 or below will have a bit problem to run few process on vista.
You will get a bit slow especially running firefox, media player and torrent together.
That is just my point of view.
*
Mind if I ask what version of Window Vista are you using?

If you are using home basic, then 512mb is enough(to be more precise, that's the minimum requirement).But, if you are using Home Premium / Business / Ultimate, 1GB is the very least you should have on your pc.Thus, running Home Premium/Business/Ultimate with a 512mb pc will be slower.

Processor might be one of the reason why your window vista is running slow.But I think the ram part should be main reason as the requirement itself stated 1Gb is the very least you should have and you are actually using 512mb.

In other words, is your own pc problem.Why blame the window? Blame your own pc. laugh.gif doh.gif
FarCry3r
post Feb 18 2009, 09:37 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(solstice818 @ Feb 18 2009, 09:31 PM)
Mind if I ask what version of Window Vista are you using?

If you are using home basic, then 512mb is enough(to be more precise, that's the minimum requirement).But, if you are using Home Premium / Business / Ultimate, 1GB is the very least you should have on your pc.Thus, running Home Premium/Business/Ultimate with a 512mb pc will be slower.

Processor might be one of the reason why your window vista is running slow.But I think the ram part should be main reason as the requirement itself stated 1Gb is the very least you should have and you are actually using 512mb.

In other words, is your own pc problem.Why blame the window? Blame your own pc.  laugh.gif  doh.gif
*
Probably you didn't know how to read, let me read it out for you, he blame the processor, not Windows. yawn.gif

This post has been edited by FarCry3r: Feb 18 2009, 09:39 PM
solstice818
post Feb 18 2009, 09:40 PM

You'll Never Walk Alone
*******
Senior Member
4,503 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: The Far Away Venus Status: Being Insua-fied


QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Feb 18 2009, 09:37 PM)
Probably you didn't know how to read, let me read it out for you, he blame the processor, not Windows. yawn.gif
*
Here's what I m talking about.

QUOTE(twinkles @ Feb 18 2009, 11:42 AM)
3. Vista is too slow this i agreed
*
Obviously, he is blaming. wink.gif doh.gif
FarCry3r
post Feb 18 2009, 09:58 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(solstice818 @ Feb 18 2009, 09:40 PM)
Here's what I m talking about.
Obviously, he is blaming. wink.gif  doh.gif
*
But you're quoting the wrong person... sweat.gif sweat.gif
jem1004
post Feb 18 2009, 10:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
43 posts

Joined: Dec 2008


Oh my god.
I never blame vista is the cause of computer slowliness.
I blame the processor.
And yes stock vista only need around 300mb of ram to load.
That is why I said 512mb of ram is already enough.
That why I blame the processor.
Everytimes you run a program, the process and thread run on the processor.
That is why vista is suit for multicore processor.
Is my post can enlighten you solstice818.

This post has been edited by jem1004: Feb 18 2009, 10:11 PM

16 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0199sec    0.28    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 06:03 AM