
okay.. noted. i do notice ur intention... but its confusing to see both topic. thanks to the mod for clearing up...
anyway continue from the previous topic..
QUOTE(lynxs @ Sep 29 2008, 12:31 PM)
how so do u mean? and would it make that much f a difference? we are talking about a phone camera anyways.....
thnx
what i mean is the software implemented in the phones for camera. and yes, i know we are talking about cameraphone... none of wat is said previously were about digital camera. and then, the imaging software is about how it captures the image, the details, the noise level, compression.. and all sort of things which lead to a decent photosnapping. if not, why would a normal pns camera also have ranges when they can have only one model to cater all?
here, E66 is business phone, hence imaging software is not well tuned, which leads to poor performances. comparing back to N82 or N95, its imaging is much better when look into the detail, colour reproduction, noise level and so on. u might say it is equipped with Carl Zeis which i think it is not really relevant, but if u compare with N80's 3mp, i would say N80's takes better image. *i am comparing those photo's via gsmarena. please take note ya.

p/s:i am not saying e66 sucks; i personally like how E66 features which makes like a one stop solution for business executives.
So if u dun get my point, why dont we see pictars... people say, pictar worth a thousand words...
N80 (credits to gsmarena)

E66 (credits to gsmarena)
