Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 WOTLK : PC Requirements, WOTLK

views
     
Imbecile
post Sep 24 2008, 11:27 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
26 posts

Joined: May 2008


I found this spec given in pc.game.com.my
http://www.pcgame.com.my/product_info.php?...4d98e364448b7f6

Minimum System Requirements
OS: Windows 98/ME/2000/XP
Processor: Pentium 3 @ 800 MHz
Memory: 256 MB
Hard Drive: 4 GB Free
Video Memory: 32 MB
Sound Card: Direct X 9.0 Compatible
Direct X: 9.0
Keyboard & Mouse
CD/DVD Rom Drive
Active Internet Connection @ 56KBPs

sweat.gif

i'm willing to be this is just a "copy and paste" coz i did read a beta forum state that even with 1G ram is not enough...
1GB Ram just isnt enough to run Dalaran during peak time hours.
http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.h...282705&sid=2000

go figure sweat.gif
TSmyremi
post Sep 25 2008, 08:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,846 posts

Joined: Feb 2006
From: Kuching, Sarawak


We wait and see.
Aggroboy
post Sep 25 2008, 09:48 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
637 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: Petaling Jaya


By turning off all detail, I was able to get a celeron with 1gb ram and integrated gfx (some GMA crap) to run WoW pretty ok (like 20-30fps). But you can't raid or go into peak-hour Shatt. Whoever the Blizzard engine programmers are, they are freaking rocket scientists.

The actual "babybutt smooth gameplay" recommendation would be closer to a Core2 2ghz and geForce 8s/radeon 3s. Golden oldies like the SLIed 6600GT still works ok.
ray123
post Sep 26 2008, 12:43 PM

Senior Citizen
*******
Senior Member
2,510 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Wrath of the Leet King.
slickz
post Sep 26 2008, 05:20 PM

Exalted Senior Elite Member
*******
Senior Member
2,149 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Behind you! Look!



for the record, I have 4GB of Kingstom DDR2 RAM and I get 29 fps at the lowest point in exodar (which is the most RAM eating place I've been in). Average about 40-50 in most places. With busy orgrimmar I get 20 plus too, it doesnt slow down we just see shadows while the game takes its time to load each phat looted char.

AMD 3500, at 1680X1050 with 7800GT and all settings maxed out. I doubt Wrath will kill my system even though it is old.
Quazacolt
post Sep 26 2008, 07:22 PM

Riding couple
*******
Senior Member
5,369 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
From: KL Malaysia


QUOTE(Aggroboy @ Sep 25 2008, 09:48 AM)
By turning off all detail, I was able to get a celeron with 1gb ram and integrated gfx (some GMA crap) to run WoW pretty ok (like 20-30fps). But you can't raid or go into peak-hour Shatt. Whoever the Blizzard engine programmers are, they are freaking rocket scientists.

The actual "babybutt smooth gameplay" recommendation would be closer to a Core2 2ghz and geForce 8s/radeon 3s. Golden oldies like the SLIed 6600GT still works ok.
*
and ur recommended specs = a mere 2-3k ish money to obtain tongue.gif

pretty damn cheap to play everything on max details AND still looks good.

but yeah, thats blizz. polished to the core tongue.gif (sc/war3/diablo anyone? ALTHOUGH DIABLO f***ING SUCKED ON MULTIPLAYER. I MEAN, MY PC LAGS ON DIABLO2, NO JOKE LOL)

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0149sec    0.37    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 02:51 AM