QUOTE(Cyclone87 @ Aug 23 2008, 06:55 PM)
Damn it seem like going to 460FSB is not possible for me even i pump to 1.5v. But there is a guy at garage sales with the same X3320 doing 480FSB at only 1.3v .
VTT and GTL Ref is the key Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!
|
|
Aug 23 2008, 07:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2008, 11:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Aug 29 2008, 05:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Aug 30 2008, 06:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 1 2008, 02:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
QUOTE(zer0hour @ Sep 1 2008, 03:25 AM) Haha 54-58C idle! Sick =p VMCH also dependant on Performance LevelHmm I had an Abit IP35-E that had GTL refs. Only 1 tho, not 2 like the IP35 Pro or most P45s. Thought the Gigabyte equivalent would have GTL Refs too. Xpresside - Intel Vcore specs indicate max safe vcore for Yorkfield to be 1.3625: http://www.intel.com/design/core2quad/documentation.htm Vtt = Vfsb. Vmch is your northbridge voltage. Typically at higher FSB levels you need to up the voltages accordingly. |
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 12:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
QUOTE(zer0hour @ Sep 1 2008, 03:37 PM) Vtt is very likely called Vfsb in your BIOS. GTL is a ratio of that figure. Not bad OC 4/3 - I can see 3.75Ghz 500FSB on my proc! It's not 100% stable though. I can run superpi 1M in 14secs but didn't get a screenshot cos it BSODed when I opened Paint hahaha. Also I'm not happy at all at that speed cos it requires 1.41v.. 3.5-3.6ghz 24/7 is not bad for 7.5x quad core |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 3 2008, 07:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2008, 08:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 7 2008, 06:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2008, 06:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 9 2008, 11:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 14 2008, 10:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Sep 14 2008, 06:54 PM) Yes, it's 1.175v as mentioned earlier. Temp sensor problem But one thing I'm not happy with my core temp [attachmentid=592571] Duno what's wrong. S1283 w/ SS kit & Tuniq TX-2 also cant help Nothing's wrong with the installation, cable management & air flow I think it's my hot room is the main factor. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16 2008, 06:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Sep 17 2008, 12:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2008, 11:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
QUOTE(zer0hour @ Oct 30 2008, 03:43 AM) Q9450 C1, 3.75Ghz, 1.256v, IBT stable: What motherboard and ram?» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Screenshot shows voltage as 1.288v, but actual load voltage due to vdroop is 1.256v: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « 4Ghz testing soon when the platform is free =) Not bad at all,dube This post has been edited by OC4/3: Oct 30 2008, 11:35 AM |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 04:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
QUOTE(bryanyeo87 @ Dec 27 2008, 03:42 AM) all x38 chips are not known to be FSB record setters, its a limitation on the chip itself. X48 is a different story, however dfi's X38 is a little better then the rest by a margin Agree on this but probably take a few hours to get thing stable,no? Still remember 445FSB/4ghz on Quad,BSOD during SPI 1M,this is the result of not enough time to tweak |
|
|
Dec 27 2008, 12:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2009, 06:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
QUOTE(rsangel @ Mar 8 2009, 05:07 PM) lol... same with me, first core in real temp showing the highest temp It is freaking normal john, for the IT show it will be on march 14 if i'm not wrong haha, btw yesterday i tried normal OC with my Q9550 C1, 1:1 400 x 8.5 stable at normal vcore , vdim 2.0..... temp shoot up to 85c =_=" (stress time) Heck i had oced some quad core with stock cooler that shot up to like 95 C under IBT So you need AXP140 + 20mm think yate loon |
|
|
Mar 8 2009, 11:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Elite
4,746 posts Joined: Dec 2007 From: Speed rule |
|
| Change to: | 0.0494sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 05:48 PM |