Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
|
xandman
|
 Apr 15 2009, 09:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(shiinkuro31 @ Apr 15 2009, 09:13 PM) show off lorr..    if btw sigma 10-20 n tokina 124, i rather choose tokina because of its fixed aperture. heard somewhere tokina 116 is very soft because of 2.8. any comments? its f3.5~5.6. this kind of question, i think u can simply click here.  or check at nikon website, im sure there's a lot of info there..  jealous?  |
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 15 2009, 09:30 PM
|
|
|
it works the same as the black colored one...  except the grey looks...different... so yeah... u can find the sample images everywhere... |
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 15 2009, 09:44 PM
|
|
|
arnd 1k...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 16 2009, 03:36 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Apr 16 2009, 11:03 AM) okay okay..i understand.
Added on April 16, 2009, 12:00 pmcan the new AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G lens do macro shots?what normal lenses are suitable or has the ability to do macro shots easily? other than specific macro lenses. no. but the 60mm micro and 105 micro can! |
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 17 2009, 08:54 AM
|
|
|
alpha_c...
u seem to be asking a lot of questions!
y dun u read the manual...
get the basics right first...
understand what u currently have...
THEN only ask questions...
i m not saying u cant afford to buy all those lenses that we have recommended...
but by asking without even knowing what u r asking...
is kinda waste...
bcoz when ull start to understand more...
u'll repeat the same questions again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 18 2009, 06:53 PM
|
|
|
there's no 50-200... maybe u want 70-200?  |
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 19 2009, 06:13 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Apr 19 2009, 03:38 AM) get the VR version..seriously it makes a difference. i tried it for quite a while now and it's much much better than the one without VR at 200mm. read this : http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/55-200mm-vr.htmto be honest im thinking of not selling my 55-200... happy with the closeup/macro performance.. wanna get a raynox 202 or 250 and get betttter results for macro shots..  @bolded : then u havent seen what a true macro lense can do...  |
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 21 2009, 09:23 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(orenzai @ Apr 21 2009, 06:16 AM) the point is that it cant go as near as the kitlens  but then if you put a raynox on it then its a total diff story raynox kills IQ! |
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 21 2009, 06:52 PM
|
|
|
hahahaha... time to get ur macro rig back? |
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 23 2009, 06:12 AM
|
|
|
u wouldnt want any of those....
u havent seen how f2.8 lense can burn a hole in ur pocket...
stick wit ur kit lense...
it fits u well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 23 2009, 01:27 PM
|
|
|
17-50...tammy...
sigma is crap...
trust me... although i dun trust either of them...
i trust tammy more...
owh anyway...2k wont burn for me...i was worried for u...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 29 2009, 09:04 AM
|
|
|
what ever u can afford is good...
raz...
luckily u answered first...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
Apr 30 2009, 04:08 PM
|
|
|
tammy for its constant aperture....!
juz get a nikon speedlight...
its not worth saving a few cents on cheaper alternatives...
|
|
|
|
|
|
xandman
|
May 8 2009, 04:53 PM
|
|
|
d40 is discontinued...
replaced with d60...
|
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0208sec
0.82
6 queries
GZIP Disabled