Honda city YM 2014
100km/h = 2k rpm
140km/h= 3k rpm
RPM reading @ 110km/h, survey
|
|
 Feb 6 2016, 01:35 AM
|
 
Junior Member
603 posts Joined: Dec 2011 From: shah alam  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 06:57 AM
|
Senior Member
5,752 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
VIOS 2007 Second Gent 1.5G
80 - 2.0 120 - 3.0 But I must stress this also. I noticed there will be some slight changes if youre using ron 97. When I using 97, 80 - 1.8. 120 - 2.8. I don't know this is placebo or what la. But I am also surprised |
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 08:11 AM
|
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars
|
QUOTE(Ancient-XinG- @ Feb 6 2016, 06:57 AM) VIOS 2007 Second Gent 1.5G Bravo!!!80 - 2.0 120 - 3.0 But I must stress this also. I noticed there will be some slight changes if youre using ron 97. When I using 97, 80 - 1.8. 120 - 2.8. I don't know this is placebo or what la. But I am also surprised  U should try ron100.. I bet 1.5 - 80  |
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 08:41 AM
|
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011
|
QUOTE(K3nnYkl82 @ Feb 6 2016, 08:11 AM) Bravo!!! U dunno?U should try ron100.. I bet 1.5 - 80 Higher RON makes Toyota SuperECT 4AT torque converter pusing faster than engine This post has been edited by dares: Feb 6 2016, 08:42 AM |
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 09:07 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,479 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mars
|
QUOTE(dares @ Feb 6 2016, 08:41 AM) U dunno? Wa no moneh mai vios wa mana tau wo.. Higher RON makes Toyota SuperECT 4AT torque converter pusing faster than engine  |
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 09:32 AM
|
Junior Member
275 posts Joined: Jul 2012
|
mazda 3 2016 skyactiv
1.9k rpm 100kmph 2k rpm 110kmph |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 12:22 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#607
|
Junior Member
60 posts Joined: Jun 2011
|
which car is 1.5l and below but lower than 2500rpm at 110kmh other than city? this should be very fuel saving on long journey. how about mazda 2? anyone knows?
This post has been edited by ledtechn: Feb 6 2016, 12:23 PM |
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 05:41 PM
|
|
Senior Member
5,752 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
LOL omfg hahaahhaahahahah
|
|
|
Feb 6 2016, 08:48 PM
|
Senior Member
5,464 posts Joined: Mar 2005
|
QUOTE(ledtechn @ Feb 6 2016, 12:22 PM) which car is 1.5l and below but lower than 2500rpm at 110kmh other than city? this should be very fuel saving on long journey. how about mazda 2? anyone knows? Mazda 2 sky active diesel. |
|
|
Feb 7 2016, 06:50 AM
|
Junior Member
27 posts Joined: May 2014
|
Ford Fiesta 1.5 S
Manual Sport mode: 3.2k RPM at 110 km/h 5th gear Normal mode: 2.4k RPM at 110 km/h This post has been edited by GalaxiasWilliam: Feb 7 2016, 08:34 AM |
|
|
Feb 8 2016, 03:21 PM
|
Senior Member
721 posts Joined: Sep 2009
|
QUOTE(ledtechn @ Feb 6 2016, 12:22 PM) which car is 1.5l and below but lower than 2500rpm at 110kmh other than city? this should be very fuel saving on long journey. how about mazda 2? anyone knows? Vw jetta.. 110km/h at 2.2 |
|
|
Feb 8 2016, 03:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
721 posts Joined: Sep 2009
|
QUOTE(ZaiZai1989 @ Feb 6 2016, 09:32 AM) mazda 3 2016 skyactiv Impressive! Better than jetta1.9k rpm 100kmph 2k rpm 110kmph |
|
|
Feb 9 2016, 01:52 PM
|
Newbie
3 posts Joined: Nov 2014
|
QUOTE(opjust @ Feb 8 2016, 03:22 PM) Impressive! Better than jetta Jetta is 1.4L mind you |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 9 2016, 07:01 PM
|
|
Junior Member
834 posts Joined: Jul 2011
|
Mazda CX3
2.3k RPM at 110kmh This post has been edited by dares: Feb 9 2016, 07:02 PM |
|
|
Feb 9 2016, 07:07 PM
|
Junior Member
77 posts Joined: Jun 2011
|
bmw e36 318i
about 2.8 - 3k at 110kmh and fuel efficiency about 8-10 L/100km |
|
|
Feb 12 2016, 04:08 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,607 posts Joined: Aug 2013
|
Proton Saga FLX 1.3 CVT
110km/h @ 2.65k rpm 100km/h @ 2.5k rpm But 110km/h saga speedometer = 100km/h gps speedometer |
|
|
Feb 12 2016, 04:25 PM
|
Senior Member
2,731 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang
|
I think someone got post before..
Same Subaru XV 1800rpm @ 110km.. Superb fuel efficient for a 4WD crossover.. |
|
|
Feb 13 2016, 04:54 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,215 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Cheras, KL.
|
Alphard 2.4 (ANH20) 110km/h~2-2.1k
|
|
|
Feb 13 2016, 11:58 AM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#619
|
All Stars
13,478 posts Joined: Jan 2012
|
QUOTE(PeesLife @ Feb 12 2016, 09:57 PM) Low rpm does not mean fuel efficient, there are too many variables and looking at rpm alone is absolutely worthless. +1Certain engines are build to burn more fuel for absolute power(torque) into the driveshaft, it is "heavier & harder" to make a turn hence the low rpm but high speed. High rpm - technically are more fuel efficient if the engine mechanism are designed to run on a low torque high rpm - ie: same speed as above however lesser fuel is required since it does not need to put out such a high torque into the drivetrain. Anyway rpm is not one of the way to determine fuel efficiency, infact low rpm is not efficient for practically everything within the concept of mechanicals RPM is not the representative for air fuel mixture. I think most car came with instant fc reading nowadays. You can use that to monitor your throttle control. It's not easyto maintain below 6-7L/100km. Even a slight tap on the throttle will increase fc without increase in speed. This post has been edited by andrekua2: Feb 13 2016, 11:58 AM |
|
|
Feb 13 2016, 12:51 PM
|
Senior Member
2,343 posts Joined: Oct 2010 From: Place known for existence of men.
|
Volkswagen Tiguan 2.0
7th-gear 1.9k @ 110km/h 3.5k @ 180km/h |
| Change to: |  0.0187sec
 0.50
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 06:38 AM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.