Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

35 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 RPM reading @ 110km/h, survey

views
     
sonic_cd
post Aug 29 2008, 11:51 AM

Friendship Is Magic
********
All Stars
19,042 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Soleanna

QUOTE(AiRBooM @ Aug 29 2008, 09:43 AM)
mine toyota wish 1.8 110@km/h  = 2900 RPM 

whoa... higher than hyudai accent?  sweat.gif

maybe i changed my rim to 17" cause it...  sweat.gif
*
i think its due to the gearbox la .. 1.8 should be using a conventinal gearbox , not the cvt .
AiRBooM
post Aug 29 2008, 01:35 PM

超低能,勁搞笑
******
Senior Member
1,562 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Sg.Buloh
QUOTE(sonic_cd @ Aug 29 2008, 11:51 AM)
i think its due to the gearbox la .. 1.8 should be using a conventinal gearbox , not the cvt .
*
1.8 using super ECT gearbox... yup.. not cvt.. .because of that ??? unsure.gif


sjz
post Aug 29 2008, 02:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,879 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(jackal400 @ Aug 29 2008, 09:27 AM)
hi sjz....im driving one too, and i can confirm that ur reading is true  smile.gif . I got the similar reading as u while driving 110km/h  sweat.gif  sweat.gif
This car has been well known for its fuel guzzling behaviour.....  biggrin.gif
*
Wa... Then for fuel guzzling monster ranking, Kembara will be on the top list lol...tongue.gif
btw, just test drive my dad's Mercedes Benz C200.
About 2900rpm can reach 110km/h already.... smile.gif
No wonder although Mercedes Benz is heavy, it won't consume lots of petrol...

This post has been edited by sjz: Aug 29 2008, 02:01 PM
shinjite
post Aug 29 2008, 02:14 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


high displacement engine mah, actually if you're crusing already, no matter how heavy your car is, it won't consume as much petrol
sjz
post Aug 29 2008, 10:22 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,879 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
QUOTE(shinjite @ Aug 29 2008, 02:14 PM)
high displacement engine mah, actually if you're crusing already, no matter how heavy your car is, it won't consume as much petrol
*
But maybe different case for Kembara lol... smile.gif
at 4000rpm all the way just to archive 110km/h, i feel that we are forcing the engine...
the recommended max speed for good fc is like 80-90km/h only... sweat.gif
ralf
post Aug 29 2008, 10:47 PM

WYSIWYG
*******
Senior Member
3,013 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang

QUOTE(stimix @ Aug 25 2008, 12:40 PM)
Honda Civic 8th Gen 1800cc:

110km/hr = 2050RPM
100km/hr =1950rpm
90km/hr = 1700rpm

So the most economical drive for Civic 1.8 is at constant 90km/hr at a really low rpm!! - Someone in the civic club managed to get almost 20km/ltr driving at that turtle constant speed.... biggrin.gif
My current average FC at RM2.70/ltr is at 12.5km/ltr at an avg speed of 107km/hr (Constant 2000rpm) 50% city/highway (Normal pumped in RM100/37ltr getting a constant 460km)

120km/hr = 2100RPM
130km/hr =2300rpm
140km/hr =2500rpm
*
Wow..good! very low revv at high speed.

May i know what's the rpm reading @160kmh and 180kmh ?
shinjite
post Aug 29 2008, 11:03 PM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(sjz @ Aug 29 2008, 10:22 PM)
But maybe different case for Kembara lol... smile.gif
at 4000rpm all the way just to archive 110km/h, i feel that we are forcing the engine...
the recommended max speed for good fc is like 80-90km/h only... sweat.gif
*
what to do, a puny 1.3 pulling a heavy chassis....
Gear ratio short
sjz
post Aug 30 2008, 10:51 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,879 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
For this type of car, engine should be at least 1.8 right? tongue.gif
amduser
post Aug 30 2008, 11:04 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


no everyone can affort a kembara 1.8 lar, even can affort also but hilux, storm and other pickup lor..
adioz88
post Aug 30 2008, 11:07 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
791 posts

Joined: Nov 2007


rpm9000
130kmj
kenderaan, tak ingat
amduser
post Aug 30 2008, 11:15 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
5,542 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


QUOTE(adioz88 @ Aug 30 2008, 11:07 AM)
rpm9000
130kmj
kenderaan, tak ingat
*
u drag gear?

this is crazy, i dont think any car can archieve that without drag gear, ur engine will spoil later.
- JaY -
post Aug 30 2008, 05:47 PM

t(^.^t)
******
Senior Member
1,031 posts

Joined: May 2006
From: What?


around 2350rpm @ 110km/h

Civic FD2. (surprisingly 1.8 got lower reading, guess the gear ratios does that)
memkingdom
post Sep 1 2008, 12:48 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
529 posts

Joined: Dec 2007
From: +(6016)-2329987



wira 1.5, 3k rpm, FC=didn't count it, tyre pressure=260
shinjite
post Sep 1 2008, 01:47 AM

�ŞħĬΩĵΐŦ��
********
All Stars
19,321 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Klang


QUOTE(- JaY - @ Aug 30 2008, 05:47 PM)
around 2350rpm @ 110km/h

Civic FD2. (surprisingly 1.8 got lower reading, guess the gear ratios does that)
*
The FD determines the speed
b00n
post Sep 1 2008, 04:44 AM

delusional
Group Icon
VIP
9,137 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Wouldn't be around much, pls PM other mods.
QUOTE(adioz88 @ Aug 30 2008, 11:07 AM)
rpm9000
130kmj
kenderaan, tak ingat
*

Kenderaan = motorbike?!........
9k RPM?!..... ohmy.gif

! Love Money
post Sep 2 2008, 07:54 AM

permanently unavailable
*******
Validating
2,073 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: last visited


QUOTE(b00n @ Sep 1 2008, 04:44 AM)
Kenderaan = motorbike?!........
9k RPM?!..... ohmy.gif
*
seldom motobike got rpm meter only or just use his pairs of ear to determine rpm?
leowhy
post Sep 2 2008, 08:23 AM

...P3Nguin PoW3R...
******
Senior Member
1,844 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: West Coast


~2800rpm for 110km/h

Engine = 1NZFE

overfloe
post Sep 2 2008, 08:41 AM

Ain't nothing but a thang..
*******
Senior Member
2,208 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: stankonia
QUOTE(amduser @ Aug 29 2008, 10:18 AM)
VIOS also can get somewhere around 2.6k, i think swift will do the same.
*
swift SPORT, not the 1.5 version.
TSjoanalooidog
post Sep 2 2008, 11:27 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,823 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
updated on 02 Sep 08
stimix
post Sep 2 2008, 11:42 AM

Dunno
Group Icon
Moderator
3,542 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Puchong, Selangor



Your update on Civic FD totally rojak!

Civic FD1 = 1.8K c.c and the RPM reading at 110km/hr =2050rpm
Civic FD2 =2.0K c.c and the RPM reading at 110km/hr =2350rpm

What the user of 2.0 (Jay) & 1.8 (me) trying to say is contrary to popular believe, bugger cc does not translate to lower RPM (Well on avg yes but not all the time)..It's more on the ratio & etc...Having said that, Civic1.8 is actually a very new engine but 2.0 is the same old tech from previous civic model...that might explained why 1.8 civic having lower RPM than 2.0 Civic....pls correct your 1st page fact..hehe (Hmnn...where is the emotionicon??)

QUOTE(joanalooidog @ Sep 2 2008, 11:27 AM)
updated on 02 Sep 08
*

35 Pages « < 12 13 14 15 16 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0166sec    0.92    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 04:11 AM