Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
RPM reading @ 110km/h, survey
|
sonic_cd
|
Aug 29 2008, 11:51 AM
|
|
QUOTE(AiRBooM @ Aug 29 2008, 09:43 AM) mine toyota wish 1.8 110@km/h = 2900 RPM whoa... higher than hyudai accent? maybe i changed my rim to 17" cause it...  i think its due to the gearbox la .. 1.8 should be using a conventinal gearbox , not the cvt .
|
|
|
|
|
|
AiRBooM
|
Aug 29 2008, 01:35 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sonic_cd @ Aug 29 2008, 11:51 AM) i think its due to the gearbox la .. 1.8 should be using a conventinal gearbox , not the cvt . 1.8 using super ECT gearbox... yup.. not cvt.. .because of that ???
|
|
|
|
|
|
sjz
|
Aug 29 2008, 02:00 PM
|
|
QUOTE(jackal400 @ Aug 29 2008, 09:27 AM) hi sjz....im driving one too, and i can confirm that ur reading is true  . I got the similar reading as u while driving 110km/h This car has been well known for its fuel guzzling behaviour.....  Wa... Then for fuel guzzling monster ranking, Kembara will be on the top list lol...  btw, just test drive my dad's Mercedes Benz C200. About 2900rpm can reach 110km/h already....  No wonder although Mercedes Benz is heavy, it won't consume lots of petrol... This post has been edited by sjz: Aug 29 2008, 02:01 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Aug 29 2008, 02:14 PM
|
|
high displacement engine mah, actually if you're crusing already, no matter how heavy your car is, it won't consume as much petrol
|
|
|
|
|
|
sjz
|
Aug 29 2008, 10:22 PM
|
|
QUOTE(shinjite @ Aug 29 2008, 02:14 PM) high displacement engine mah, actually if you're crusing already, no matter how heavy your car is, it won't consume as much petrol But maybe different case for Kembara lol...  at 4000rpm all the way just to archive 110km/h, i feel that we are forcing the engine... the recommended max speed for good fc is like 80-90km/h only...
|
|
|
|
|
|
ralf
|
Aug 29 2008, 10:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(stimix @ Aug 25 2008, 12:40 PM) Honda Civic 8th Gen 1800cc: 110km/hr = 2050RPM 100km/hr =1950rpm 90km/hr = 1700rpm So the most economical drive for Civic 1.8 is at constant 90km/hr at a really low rpm!! - Someone in the civic club managed to get almost 20km/ltr driving at that turtle constant speed.... My current average FC at RM2.70/ltr is at 12.5km/ltr at an avg speed of 107km/hr (Constant 2000rpm) 50% city/highway (Normal pumped in RM100/37ltr getting a constant 460km) 120km/hr = 2100RPM 130km/hr =2300rpm 140km/hr =2500rpm Wow..good! very low revv at high speed. May i know what's the rpm reading @160kmh and 180kmh ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Aug 29 2008, 11:03 PM
|
|
QUOTE(sjz @ Aug 29 2008, 10:22 PM) But maybe different case for Kembara lol...  at 4000rpm all the way just to archive 110km/h, i feel that we are forcing the engine... the recommended max speed for good fc is like 80-90km/h only...  what to do, a puny 1.3 pulling a heavy chassis.... Gear ratio short
|
|
|
|
|
|
sjz
|
Aug 30 2008, 10:51 AM
|
|
For this type of car, engine should be at least 1.8 right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
amduser
|
Aug 30 2008, 11:04 AM
|
|
no everyone can affort a kembara 1.8 lar, even can affort also but hilux, storm and other pickup lor..
|
|
|
|
|
|
adioz88
|
Aug 30 2008, 11:07 AM
|
|
rpm9000 130kmj kenderaan, tak ingat
|
|
|
|
|
|
amduser
|
Aug 30 2008, 11:15 AM
|
|
QUOTE(adioz88 @ Aug 30 2008, 11:07 AM) rpm9000 130kmj kenderaan, tak ingat u drag gear? this is crazy, i dont think any car can archieve that without drag gear, ur engine will spoil later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- JaY -
|
Aug 30 2008, 05:47 PM
|
|
around 2350rpm @ 110km/h
Civic FD2. (surprisingly 1.8 got lower reading, guess the gear ratios does that)
|
|
|
|
|
|
memkingdom
|
Sep 1 2008, 12:48 AM
|
|
wira 1.5, 3k rpm, FC=didn't count it, tyre pressure=260
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Sep 1 2008, 01:47 AM
|
|
QUOTE(- JaY - @ Aug 30 2008, 05:47 PM) around 2350rpm @ 110km/h Civic FD2. (surprisingly 1.8 got lower reading, guess the gear ratios does that) The FD determines the speed
|
|
|
|
|
|
b00n
|
Sep 1 2008, 04:44 AM
|
delusional
|
QUOTE(adioz88 @ Aug 30 2008, 11:07 AM) rpm9000 130kmj kenderaan, tak ingat Kenderaan = motorbike?!........ 9k RPM?!.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
! Love Money
|
Sep 2 2008, 07:54 AM
|
|
QUOTE(b00n @ Sep 1 2008, 04:44 AM) Kenderaan = motorbike?!........ 9k RPM?!.....  seldom motobike got rpm meter only or just use his pairs of ear to determine rpm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
leowhy
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:23 AM
|
|
~2800rpm for 110km/h
Engine = 1NZFE
|
|
|
|
|
|
overfloe
|
Sep 2 2008, 08:41 AM
|
|
QUOTE(amduser @ Aug 29 2008, 10:18 AM) VIOS also can get somewhere around 2.6k, i think swift will do the same. swift SPORT, not the 1.5 version.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSjoanalooidog
|
Sep 2 2008, 11:27 AM
|
|
updated on 02 Sep 08
|
|
|
|
|
|
stimix
|
Sep 2 2008, 11:42 AM
|
Dunno
|
Your update on Civic FD totally rojak! Civic FD1 = 1.8K c.c and the RPM reading at 110km/hr =2050rpm Civic FD2 =2.0K c.c and the RPM reading at 110km/hr =2350rpm What the user of 2.0 (Jay) & 1.8 (me) trying to say is contrary to popular believe, bugger cc does not translate to lower RPM (Well on avg yes but not all the time)..It's more on the ratio & etc...Having said that, Civic1.8 is actually a very new engine but 2.0 is the same old tech from previous civic model...that might explained why 1.8 civic having lower RPM than 2.0 Civic....pls correct your 1st page fact..hehe (Hmnn...where is the emotionicon??) QUOTE(joanalooidog @ Sep 2 2008, 11:27 AM)
|
|
|
|
|