Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 HUAAN (2739), All about huaan post here

views
     
cherroy
post Oct 29 2008, 11:03 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(eltaria @ Oct 29 2008, 10:23 AM)
actually, i wanted to talk about this too. mind exchanging thoughts on huaan?

Short term, steel sector wont recover for at least 6 months.
Even if recover it's hard to say if it'll reach the level during olympic times.

Long term,
Would you buy huaan when there's other big fishes at discount prices too?

For example, I'm thinking both short term and also long term, it's better to buy genting at 3.5 for example or carlsberg at 3.x, guiness at 4 or Reits with 10% dividends now....

There's just so many other shares that's worth much more, in long term growth potential, dividends and short term growth too, that's why i decided to bite the bullet and exit now.

But then again, i didn't buy too much huaan. so it's not too big a bullet, and i can still makan it smile.gif
Disclaimer : this is not an advice to sell...
notworthy.gif  notworthy.gif
Huaan see red already. 0.205.....


Added on October 29, 2008, 10:31 amall gains in the first 2 hours lost, counters seeing red already now.
So fast lost momentum.
*
Yup, there are a lot other more stable business model or company stocks that are attractive as well.
Huaan stock is mainly attractive because of hardly beaten down, with no gearing and selling 50% of its NTA. But if company making losses and need to raise borrowing afterwards, then everything should be assessed all together, as fundamental no longer the same.
That's why need to monitor its financial result closely to determine its near future.

6 months?, I reckon at least 1-2 years and above before any real and obvious recovery can be seen.

cherroy
post Oct 29 2008, 11:13 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(htt @ Oct 29 2008, 11:06 AM)
I actually prepared for their profit to be halved, with cash generated to weather through the coming recession. The capacity expansion just come in at the wrong time but it won't burden them much. What I concern more is the impact of the environment issue (although they claim they are very environmental friendly, but the industry is well known to be notoriously pollutant. If what they claimed was true, we might see their competitors shutting down by environmental pressure, thus benefiting them). Can try to invest on this type of share, but not to be dominant in the portfolio. That's my 2 cents.
*
Capacity expansion will incur a lot of capital expenditure which drive down the cashflow while overhead expenses which might reduce the company profit signficantly.
Don't look down company overhead expenses especially for manufacturing company, it could be significant as well that's why company need to layoff staff, downsizing during bad time as it could save a lot of overhead expenses.
cherroy
post Oct 29 2008, 11:56 AM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(htt @ Oct 29 2008, 11:33 AM)
I think the capex already incurred and reflected in their 2Q financial statement, and personal cost will be limited to direct labor to the new plant (a lot of overlapping labor can be saved, if they planned it wisely). I still waiting for 3Q result to confirm whether to increase/ decrease/ maintain my holding. But judge from the research posted on their website, I guess 3Q result might be 10~20% lower than 2Q, thus maintain 'buy in weakness' policy for me. Wait for 3Q result, I long term investor.  tongue.gif The one-day rally almost over, think market was not convincing with Dow's 10% hike.
*
You have to consider the depreciation of new plant that drive down the profit. So even the plant doesn't hire personnel to run it and left it abandon, it still drives down the company profit.
Although depreciation doesn't affect the cashflow.

For manufacturing company, as long as it doesn't fully utilise the capacity, it will affect the company profit.



cherroy
post Oct 29 2008, 01:48 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(SKY 1809 @ Oct 29 2008, 12:06 PM)
In economic situation like this, cashflow is more important than Profit for survival.

Long term wise, profit is very important., and has great impact on share prices.

Just my 2sen.
*
Yup, short term wise especially in current financial turmoil, sustainable cashflow is the most important criteria for company to 'sail' through the difficult period.
Not only short term, but long term as well, cashflow is one of the most important factor for company operation which only with positive cashflow from profit which enable to give dividend to the shareholders.

But long term wise, profit is the most important for stock market. As why we want to invest in stock market? because we can share a piece of profit that company made. Without making profit, it doesn't make sense to invest in stock to become a shareholder which earn nothing, as it is much better keep those money in the FD which earn you surely interest while with lesser risk. smile.gif
cherroy
post Jun 10 2009, 02:37 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Staff
25,802 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(owstrade @ Jun 10 2009, 02:30 PM)
commodity is always king, huaan is producing coke in china, u can relate it to steel demand. Actually to thing that make Huaan profit:
1. the difference in the price of coke(the product-to-be-sold) and the coal(the material-need-to-buy) the higher the difference the higher the magin
2. the economy which affect the steel demand which affect the coke demand

Jim Roger and George Soros agree that the China is the next dragon that the world have to watch out, the economy growth of china is going to open our month soon, thus the coke demand is definitely increasing.

Actually from the profile of Huaan, it is not an ambitious company that have big big vision like Genting and KNM who always aim to be the world top player. However, as commodity is still king, the profit of investing in it is still quite attractive and promising
*
Commodities are heading north, no doubt about that.

But company related to commodities won't benefit directly through the high price of it except for those doing the basic raw materials one, like Exxon (drilling oil), BHP or Rio Tinto that own iron ore.

As stated in (1), basic commodities price rising might lead to higher coal price eventually cost of Huaan become higher while coke price might not rise in line with coal, as economy is not growing robustly yet so demand for steel might not back to its old glory day, so profit margin could be shrinking in this kind of scenario, which is not fully favourable for those doing intermediate commodities prodcut.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0229sec    0.12    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 04:50 AM