Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Photography Panasonic LX-3 King of the King of digicam Updated, LEICAF2.0,1/1.63 sensor,24mm,HD,hotshoe
|
joyyy
|
 Jan 6 2009, 01:05 AM
|
|
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jan 5 2009, 11:38 PM) a camera does not instant pawn other camera just because it has big sensor. You have to see other feature and usability and price. This is free world. I'm free to comment whoever comment there is. But I love to comment your comment  Now that's weird. You seem to be siding the LX3 because it produces better IQ most of the other compacts. When I mention the DP1, all of a sudden having superior IQ alone isn't enough. If it pleases you, maybe I should rephrase my previous post. QUOTE Lulz.
In terms of IQ, The Sigma pwnz all of them. smile.gif
srsly |
|
|
|
|
|
joyyy
|
Jan 6 2009, 02:06 PM
|
|
|
Im just curious here.
Why buy a camera with [insert megapixels here] if you're not going to shoot at full resolution?
|
|
|
|
|
|
joyyy
|
Jan 6 2009, 03:06 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(tHe^CuLpRit @ Jan 6 2009, 02:16 PM) hehe I know la.... in 10 mp case its fine to shoot in that resolution, I had just mention that if it allows to increase the optical zoom, it can be considered to reduce the megapixel count. Anyways if you have something like a 24-megapixel cam, doubt you wana shoot in that format all the while, considering the file size. But I wouldn't know really, my last cam was only 5.1mp. If I had the monies to buy a 24MP camera, memory cards shouldnt be a problem.  And then again, I woudn't buy a 24MP cam if I didn't want the MP  |
|
|
|
|
|
joyyy
|
Jan 6 2009, 04:23 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Aurora @ Jan 6 2009, 03:58 PM) Depends on scenario, I normally use between 4.5 MP to full MP. Full MP when there are a lot of details, nice scenery, group photos, mostly wide angle. 6.5MP at casual hangout, friends and family, discrete macro, clean and simple composition, random shot. 4.5MP (sometimes 3MP) is usually use during work, i.e. site visit, inspection etc. As MP count goes higher, the details between MP less significant. For e.g., From 3MP to 6MP, 41.4% more pixel count per horizontal/vertical line From 6MP to 9MP, 22.5% From 9MP to 12MP, 15.5% From 12MP to 15MP, 11.8% From 15MP to 18MP, 9.54% To get double quality (or twice magnification) of a 6MP, we need 36MP camera. Well that's you then I guess. For me the resolution setting never changes, even for a random shot  |
|
|
|
|
|
joyyy
|
Jan 6 2009, 06:49 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(ifer @ Jan 6 2009, 06:39 PM) my largeformat scan is average at 240 to 500 mp can rival? what's the big fuss about megapixels? What we're talking about here is having a camera of a certain megapixel but not fully utilizing the full resolution, which I find a bit "wasteful", so to say.  Who in the world talked about rivalling you in the first place.  |
|
|
|
|
|
joyyy
|
Jan 7 2009, 10:42 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(tHe^CuLpRit @ Jan 7 2009, 09:33 PM) ladies and gentlemen... i am now a proud owner of a black LX3  Too bad my pictures are all shit so far  Maybe should stick to iA for now  Just go straight for the Aperture mode. It's the mode most people use, DSLR people  |
|
|
|
|
|
joyyy
|
Jan 12 2009, 03:22 PM
|
|
|
QUOTE(tHe^CuLpRit @ Jan 12 2009, 03:19 PM) Thanks Aurora, I think I'll stick to Standard and Nature. Will try to upload my pics soon, no time to host it sumwhere also. Btw does this forum allow for linking to Flikr/Picasa, or it has to be ImageShack>? Yep, I upload my photos to Picasa and link them here =D |
|
|
|
|
|
joyyy
|
Jan 16 2009, 10:34 AM
|
|
|
QUOTE(Ppsprov @ Jan 15 2009, 10:51 PM) hmmmm...if not to repair...my next camera wnt be LX series anymore... Some more..this camera...dont know how to"dispose"... Sell it off cheaply, then maybe get your paws on a, say A200? |
|
|
|
|
Quote
0.0505sec
0.74
7 queries
GZIP Disabled