QUOTE(propcritic @ Sep 23 2009, 01:16 AM)
Same Xui Cheng ah? Baby cute leh...
Haha, the baby is really cute. She is pretty as well.
Mind u, even Mr CAnnot Tahan did a same mistake at realestate link by putting a wrong facebook as well, he apologised after the "actual" person sounded him.
hehehe.
Added on September 23, 2009, 7:57 amQUOTE(Pai @ Sep 23 2009, 01:24 AM)
I dont make false claims like Xui Cheng TO MISS-SELL SW so answering you is rather...........pointless. Even Zavier and Cannot Tahan who is vested in SW never made such claims, so credit to them for not being overboard and being fair enuff in our previous discussions.
FYI here r some questions that I asked u 1st, I'll answer your question when u answer mine (altho I doubt u have the capacity to do so) :
I think I've made my point to the public, that u r all talk. Empty drums often is the loudest. Till tiday, you still cant clarify/correct all your claims below :
1. SW will be the land mark of puchong.
3. If PFCC, IOI Belev, SW commercial blocks all work out, SW will be the 1st one to be benefited.
Other debatable claims by Xui Cheng that remains unanswered :
4. You have yet to prove to us your claims on " Puchong has more businessman".
5. I asked why your "business" man would go for SW instead of the other Puchong condo? SW is the most expensive, have the least facility and located in the a traffic area so whats the main selling point here?
6. SW as a brand? Very interesting. Care to explain what brand equity does SW brings to its buyers?
7. Again, what is the personal preference that makes ppl want to buy SW VS any other condo in Puchong?
Claiming something that isnt true/cant be proven, is wishful thinking and blatantly misleading (Am being polite trying not to label you a liar that is working very hard to push only one particular project, its almost like you are working for SP). 
Move on Pai,
Accusing people as liar & retard wont bring u to success.
I understand you are struggling to save your credibility here, after your blunders were pointed out, as a Paineer
Emotion will always cloud your mind and obstruct you from seeing the obvious, disabling you from reading the simple.
I am here to share, not to convince.
I asked u the same Qs days ago, which you have been avoiding.
I invite u to show me that u are capable of understanding the basic, b4 we move on to more intellectual discussion.
1. Would a goodwill of a developer has any bearing in term of properties' potential and likelihood of complete VP in time?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4nuIyPHnFM2. Are there plenty or lacking of businessman in Puchong?
3. Is paper gain = materialized profit?
4. Is SW different from Zest, Zen... in term of concept and lifestyle? Is yes, would there be a market differentiation?
5. Selling fast = Good? have you seen any exception?
6. Can all businessman afford a Bungalow or Semi D? (since u claimed that businessman will stay in bangalow & semD)
7. Is personal preference one of the contributing factor in one's decision?
8. Is "expensive" an illusion subject to affordability, with a little bit of personal preference?
9. Is "high End" subject to relativity?
10. Comparing Rolex and B&R, Rolex is definitely more practical, why some younger generation opts for B&R given the same price tag?
11. Can the above questions be answered by mere common sense?
12. Would those in ZEST, Zen...face the traffic jam? Zen may need to use the same highway to reach home...
Given you "outstanding" record in Zest, i'm not sure whether u can read or not...Did you enjoy the youtube link, in which you rubbished all the claims?
Oops, top up Qs:-
14. Is Chuah Xui Cheng always right? Bonus question, answer is NO, a BIG NO
15. Is Pai always right? If Yes, 15.1 was he right in rubbishing all the claims against Zest's dev, 15.2 and asking everyone to wait for minimum a year for Zest, and he bought one in 6 months?
This post has been edited by chuah xui cheng: Sep 23 2009, 07:59 AM