Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Household [Home Appliances] Water Filter, for drinking water purpose
|
KIntos
|
Jul 24 2012, 02:01 PM
|
|
QUOTE(jack~daniel @ Jul 24 2012, 12:16 PM) espring using 0.2 micron... 0.2 micron sure anot? you think diamond filter spec? amway only stated as small as 0.2 micron mean it's potential to filter as small as 0.2 micron. well amway espring still the best, just the price This post has been edited by KIntos: Jul 24 2012, 02:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIntos
|
Jul 24 2012, 02:23 PM
|
|
QUOTE(jack~daniel @ Jul 24 2012, 02:17 PM) Particulate contaminants including asbestos, rust, sediment, dirt, and scale as small as 0.2 microns (1/300th diameter of a human hair). ok lah. similar to HEPA spec already
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIntos
|
Jul 24 2012, 03:48 PM
|
|
QUOTE(NIckLJF @ Jul 24 2012, 03:27 PM) Looking at the picture here: http://www.deltapure.net/product_images/up...size_chart5.gifWhat a 0.2 micron can filter can also be filtered by a 0.5micron size, just saying. Both still belong in the micro-filtration category some bacteria unable to be filtered by 0.5 micron thats why 3M only stated 99.5% while Espring 99.9%. look at the arrow of Bacteria which smallest up to 0.2 micron.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIntos
|
Jul 24 2012, 07:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE(NIckLJF @ Jul 24 2012, 06:28 PM) Lol..0.4% difference... lets hope not too big a difference there. Heard that all the manufacturers claim for bacteria reduction is based on selected bacteria only as the tests are not carried out for all bacteria. Anyone can verify? Some bacteria is smaller than 0.5 micron 0.4% out of millions. its enough to make you weak if 0.4% bacteria is vulnerable specifically to your health.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KIntos
|
Jul 25 2012, 09:26 AM
|
|
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « QUOTE(zheilwane @ Jul 25 2012, 12:45 AM) weikee since u r using APDWS 1000, what do you think about the 0.4% difference? Is the filter able to provide good taste and clean water? Added on July 25, 2012, 1:35 am3M is value for money. Considering less than RM 2k u can get an outdoor filter that could provide clean water for showering, laundry and etc and also an indoor filter that could provide clean & healthy drinking water. Since many forumers are debating on epsing, for the price more than RM 2k, it can only provide good driking water but how about shower and laundry? To compare on performance, espring has better disinfection due to UV light but 3M package (indoor + outdoor) has an advantage on providing clean water for your whole house at at a lower price. So, u decide, is it worthy to forgo a good outdoor water filter for a UV light? what is the difference on 0.4% without any scientific measurement. How we would know how many bacteria on 0.4% without measurement tools or does it good taste and clean water enough to justify a good drinking water filter? I knew you carrying 3M products. Espring advantages is UV light compare to 3M as per current model. Therefore the price is expensive on Espring as they still holding the ranking in water filtration system. There are few competitor to Espring but in different classes which i know is Coway RO system. 3M= value yet good filtration Espring= expensive but enchance filtration with UV tech. Got money got chances to go for better life style. All about money. Somehow i still do have fren uncle who can afford Espring/Coway/Aquasana/3M product but they chooses Diamond system as they heard everywhere about Diamond System last time. thats all i can conclude for now. I do know you are promoting your product in value price but the example you show between used china made vs brand new PS is a failure unless you show both used or both brand new. 3M and Espring is different class system.
|
|
|
|
|