Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Household [Home Appliances] Water Filter, for drinking water purpose

views
     
KIntos
post Jul 24 2012, 02:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,132 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(jack~daniel @ Jul 24 2012, 12:16 PM)
espring using 0.2 micron...
*
0.2 micron sure anot? you think diamond filter spec? amway only stated as small as 0.2 micron mean it's potential to filter as small as 0.2 micron.

well amway espring still the best, just the price tongue.gif

This post has been edited by KIntos: Jul 24 2012, 02:16 PM
KIntos
post Jul 24 2012, 02:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,132 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(jack~daniel @ Jul 24 2012, 02:17 PM)
yes confirmed...
*
Particulate contaminants including asbestos, rust, sediment, dirt, and scale as small as 0.2 microns (1/300th diameter of a human hair).

ok lah. similar to HEPA spec already
KIntos
post Jul 24 2012, 03:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,132 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(NIckLJF @ Jul 24 2012, 03:27 PM)
Looking at the picture here: http://www.deltapure.net/product_images/up...size_chart5.gif

What a 0.2 micron can filter can also be filtered by a 0.5micron size, just saying. Both still belong in the micro-filtration category
*
some bacteria unable to be filtered by 0.5 micron thats why 3M only stated 99.5% while Espring 99.9%. look at the arrow of Bacteria which smallest up to 0.2 micron.
KIntos
post Jul 24 2012, 07:16 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,132 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
QUOTE(NIckLJF @ Jul 24 2012, 06:28 PM)
Lol..0.4% difference... lets hope not too big a difference there.

Heard that all the manufacturers claim for bacteria reduction is based on selected bacteria only as the tests are not carried out for all bacteria. Anyone can verify?
*
Some bacteria is smaller than 0.5 micron 0.4% out of millions. its enough to make you weak if 0.4% bacteria is vulnerable specifically to your health.
KIntos
post Jul 25 2012, 09:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,132 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


what is the difference on 0.4% without any scientific measurement. How we would know how many bacteria on 0.4% without measurement tools or does it good taste and clean water enough to justify a good drinking water filter? I knew you carrying 3M products.

Espring advantages is UV light compare to 3M as per current model. Therefore the price is expensive on Espring as they still holding the ranking in water filtration system. There are few competitor to Espring but in different classes which i know is Coway RO system.

3M= value yet good filtration
Espring= expensive but enchance filtration with UV tech.

Got money got chances to go for better life style. All about money. Somehow i still do have fren uncle who can afford Espring/Coway/Aquasana/3M product but they chooses Diamond system as they heard everywhere about Diamond System last time.

thats all i can conclude for now. I do know you are promoting your product in value price but the example you show between used china made vs brand new PS is a failure unless you show both used or both brand new. 3M and Espring is different class system. smile.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0419sec    0.27    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 07:43 AM