if foreigner can buy la. i also already jump lor

Wait, where's the confirmation that SG iPhones unlocked for foreign sims? The article in Cnet actually mentioned only M1 and Starhub sims.

Yep string, that is why , we waiting now. can be use local sim or not.

I still can't find any source that mention SG iPhone is unlock..
Where you guy get the info?

Lol dunno this link can be trusted or not leh..

That is basically what's on Singtel webpage. Still could mean it is unlocked to Starhub and M1 sims only. We need concrete proof on Malaysian sims.

Alamak blog,maybe it unlock for SG telco only...not fully unlock..but wait for the real results..

man... am i gonna jump onto the next aeroline to singapore? hurry...

@string

Just now you mentioned earlier 800SGD as early termination fees. Can link me to the source so I can read more details on it. As in need wait how many month only can unlock and what other fees included etc etc..

they don't sell it without contract.
are you SG citizen or permanent resident? or holder of any SG work pass?
if yes then you can do it now.

ha ha. of course i know that. i just need to select the right person to be my "victim".

lol,he just a rabbit man....

Can share victim??

from what I know, you need to pay minimum 3 months of subscription fee + SGD800 for early termination.

This was never mentioned on any of the Singtel online plans. A few of the HWZ folks called Singtel on 1626 and got that info from the Singtel personnel while on the phone.

Owh.. Thanks anyways..

*Prays that Singaporean iPhones usable with local telcos*

there is a way to "minimise" my lost; find someone in singapore who needs the minutes/tariff more than i do (or doesn't appreciate the iphone). that way, i'm actually "subsidising" his line rental.

---

Added on August 22, 2008, 1:47 ambut no point be so hopeful. let's wait for a confirmed answer, rather than an abstract one.

This post has been edited by nokia2003: Aug 22 2008, 01:47 AM

That's the part I dont like, "subsiding someone a free line". I have this principle that whatever I buy must be owned and only used by me only. If I had to share it with someone, that someone also have to share the burden of payment.

This "forced subsidization" is not something I'm keen of.

it is a win-win situation i reckon.


in reality, there are many people who doesn't mind using a crappy phone. since he/she needs to maintain the contract/require the minutes anyway, how is that a disadvantage situation for any of us?

To each his own, I guess. Just not my cup of tea.