QUOTE(Phoeni_142 @ Mar 10 2009, 08:42 AM)
For point number 2 - it is a pandora's box, my friend. Let me explain.
1. Financial solvency can't be confused with execution and reputation. There's an old saying, "I'd rather get a B+ or C- in Strategy, but an A++ in Execution". Long story short, how sure are u that the "not so reputable developer can execute? What would u do when the finishing is poor? Or defects galore exists and they fix it at a snail's pace? Unless of course, u mention that this falls within your acceptable risk appetite.
2. Assuming the condo gets completed on time with no problems (I'll pray for u) - this lies my biggest phobia - the management company of the condo / apartment. I seriously hope that anyone that buys UC will do some due diligence here. The Mgmt company of the condo will make or break the condo. Care to share how due diligence is done here?
Very simple my fren, just check their existing/completed projects. 1. Financial solvency can't be confused with execution and reputation. There's an old saying, "I'd rather get a B+ or C- in Strategy, but an A++ in Execution". Long story short, how sure are u that the "not so reputable developer can execute? What would u do when the finishing is poor? Or defects galore exists and they fix it at a snail's pace? Unless of course, u mention that this falls within your acceptable risk appetite.
2. Assuming the condo gets completed on time with no problems (I'll pray for u) - this lies my biggest phobia - the management company of the condo / apartment. I seriously hope that anyone that buys UC will do some due diligence here. The Mgmt company of the condo will make or break the condo. Care to share how due diligence is done here?
Plus when I say not so reputable, I dont mean newbies. Im referring to developers with less than 3 completed projects to date, not to those who r new to property development.
Mar 10 2009, 08:53 AM

Quote
0.0505sec
0.67
7 queries
GZIP Disabled