New Trailers:
Movies STAR TREK: Movies Discussion Thread, Next: ST3 for 50th Anniversary Year Film
|
|
 Dec 25 2008, 09:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03  
|
Star Trek is not really my favourite childhood shows but i'll watch it just because of J.J Abrams!!
New Trailers: |
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2009, 10:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
This year is really exciting. JJ Abram's Star Trek, Micahel Bay's Transformers, McG's Terminator, and Xmen Origin.
 This post has been edited by maxizanc: Apr 29 2009, 10:04 PM |
|
|
May 2 2009, 10:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(CKC_1 @ May 2 2009, 09:44 PM) never been a fan of star trek , but after watching the trailer , damn im gonna watch this Same here. Will be watching just because of JJ Abrams. |
|
|
May 6 2009, 02:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Gonna watch this movie. Seemed like not much hype about this movie. Reading the reviews from the newspapers and magazines, this movie is really underrated in the beginning unlike the disappointing X-Men Origins, Dragon Ball and The Fast And The Furious which are overrated.
Am not a fan of Star Trek and Transformers as i was a child and i am sure i will not be dissapointed after watching both movies. Love JJ Abrams to bits. And yes, tomorrow is Wednesday. This post has been edited by maxizanc: May 6 2009, 02:48 AM |
|
|
May 6 2009, 11:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Really respect a Michael Bay and JJ Abrams. They are not a Transformers and Star Trek fan but they direct the movie so he could turn a non-fan viewers into a die hard fan. Not only the viewers but them themselves.
Me also not a fan of Transformers and Star Trek, but these 2 directors able to make me watching the old school cartoons and tv series/movies. |
|
|
May 6 2009, 11:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(QuickFire @ May 6 2009, 11:50 PM) eh dont equate Bay with Abrams. I don't. I respect JJ Abrams more actually. I compared the two directors not because of the personality but because of both of their movies are able to change people.btw it's up to 41 reviews at RT, still 100%. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 7 2009, 12:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ May 6 2009, 11:59 PM) i havent seen anything from Abrams that i actually like. If you're a Lost fan, you'll be amazed.this might be the first,judging from the reviews  |
|
|
May 7 2009, 12:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(QuickFire @ May 7 2009, 12:15 AM) I greatly enjoyed both M:I:II and Cloverfield for what they are. He is by no means great yet, but he's still new. Correct me if i'm wrong. If i'm not mistaken he only directed MI3. And he is the produce of Cloverfield. And he's the writer of Armageddon.Movie/TV Series that he directed: # Untitled Hunter Scott Project # Anatomy of Hope # Star Trek # "The Office" # "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" # Mission: Impossible III # "Alias" # "Lost" # "Felicity" This post has been edited by maxizanc: May 7 2009, 12:27 AM |
|
|
May 7 2009, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Bought 3 ticket tomorrow at 7.30 pm. Can't wait.
|
|
|
May 8 2009, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
How many hours duration?
|
|
|
May 8 2009, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
142 reviews, 94% tomatometer.
 http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_trek_11/ IMDB: 83%, 2311 votes. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0796366/ |
|
|
May 8 2009, 11:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
JJ Abrams and his time travel theory. He's done it again!
|
|
|
May 9 2009, 01:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Gonna watch again on next Wednesday. Can't get enough of this movie. Movie of the year for me so far.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 9 2009, 02:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Nobody ever mentioned about Eric Bana as Captain Nero? He was awesome as well. Just like tom Cruise from Trophic Thunder, i was like.. hey i know this guy but what's his name... patiently waited and saw Eric Bana name as Nero. LOL
Actually many actors from TV series acting in the movie such as Jennifer Morrison (Cameron from House), Zachary Quinto (Sylar from Heroes) and many more. This post has been edited by maxizanc: May 9 2009, 02:19 AM |
|
|
May 9 2009, 02:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Different version of Chekov.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
May 9 2009, 11:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Haha. Whatever you wanna say. I'm happy because i was not a Star Trek fan, otherwise i will not enjoy JJ Abram's Star Trek (just like you) or probably stop being Star Trek fan after watching it.
This post has been edited by maxizanc: May 9 2009, 11:57 PM |
|
|
May 10 2009, 12:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
Yeah. The reason why Watchmen couldn't impress many people.
|
|
|
May 10 2009, 12:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(killdavid @ May 10 2009, 12:42 AM) Just like The Watchmen and practically every remake or adaptation the elitist will come bashing this and complaining that. Yeah man. You spoke for me. - Movie leaves out scientific explanation: If they go in details, they lose the attention span of non-geeks and young generation audience. Movie Bombs in box-office and the end of a franchise. - Movie stays true to the old films, more character study = snooze-fest. Ppl complain not enough action like The Watchmen. Critics will say its not trying anything original and not pushing boundaries. Lets face it. Who would be so kind/stupid to fork out money from their own pockets just to please a bunch of hardcore geeks? Its all about the money. ST is an old franchise, it needs to connect with the younger audience to keep it alive. It can't survive by pleasing the elitist.  |
|
|
May 12 2009, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(technophile @ May 12 2009, 11:13 AM) yeah. i hate elitist. they refuse to evolve according to time. Shhhh.. we have one of them here.. |
|
|
May 14 2009, 11:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
5,909 posts Joined: Jan 2006 From: 06.02.58.44.23.08.03
|
QUOTE(kding2 @ May 14 2009, 11:08 PM) 2 Hour length is alright..Not too long and not too short. I heard somebody said the uncut BD version is 3 hours duration.. |
| Change to: |  0.0188sec
 0.80
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 06:24 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.