Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies STAR TREK: Movies Discussion Thread, Next: ST3 for 50th Anniversary Year Film

views
     
calibre2001
post May 14 2009, 08:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(noonian @ May 8 2009, 02:50 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

just snippets of it..not the whole main theme played during the opening of the tv series

pity william shatner tho haha...his usual "space...the final frontier" speech kena curi by Nimoy ahahahhaa...
*
Well it has been done before in Star Trek 2: THe Wrath of Khan


Added on May 14, 2009, 8:27 pmThings I like:

-this movie has definitely brought back the Star Trek franchise from obscurity. this will spur a new generation of fans
-the actors and production crew really did their homework. kudos to that.
-non fans will like it because its a nice , cozy intro
-very gung ho, way more exaggerated than the original version actually


Now as a Trekkie, things I don't like (warning geeeky comments)
-villain was obviously useless, not even worth mentioning
-Leonard Nimoy (old spock) 's lines suck big time, he sounded more like a senile human old man than vulcan
-2 hours too short
-no time to see character development and chemistry between the actors. One thing that made Will Shatner and gang popular was the chemistry between kirk, spock, and bones. hopefully in future instalments we'll see a different yet cool take on it
-lack of positive theme (i.e. peace, human unity, anti-racism) but this would have bore most people anyway, instead we get young kirk and jing gang story


Added on May 14, 2009, 8:30 pm
QUOTE(Makakeke @ May 9 2009, 02:37 AM)
yea i thought that was the best characterization (is that the right word?) of the original cast. Spock comes second.
*
He mimicked Bones well, I would have prefered to see a different take on the character though. And I think Sylar and Spock is an awesome combination, no complaints about Quinto here.


Added on May 14, 2009, 8:35 pm
QUOTE(frega @ May 9 2009, 08:14 PM)
i sighed a little when it ended. i like it BUT, huge but...

it felt like a michael bay movie to be honest. so action packed, so flashy with the crazy lens flare use and FX, so...mainstream. which isnt necessarily bad, just didnt feel like star trek. no prime directive(yes there was no prime directive at that time) but its like it has no direction! If this were a parallel universe... there might be a possibility that the prime directive might not even come to existent in this timeline yawn.gif god that would suck so much.

it might be the end of the star trek we knew and love. bye bye sleek metal voyager, hello apple store voyager.

Chekov was so cute tho.

Other grips that may contain spoilers VVVVVV
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
You're a true Trekkie. I know how you feel but if it's giving Star Trek a reboot then its defnitely worth it. But remember TOS was never science-techno-centric. It was the TNG series and beyond that gave birth to that

This post has been edited by calibre2001: May 14 2009, 08:35 PM
calibre2001
post May 31 2009, 09:07 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
154 posts

Joined: May 2008
This show is a good opportunity for star trek to regain its long lost appeal from the public. And so far it is excelling at that.

I think older trekkers should just be glad that this movie is able to do that.

For me Star trek has always been about the tv series, not the movies. I really hope they'll create a new series soon!

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0193sec    0.38    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 26th November 2025 - 03:18 AM