Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
RPG [PC] Diablo III, Release Date: Whenever it's finished :p
|
Sichiri
|
Jun 30 2008, 10:24 PM
|
|
QUOTE(StarGhazzer @ Jun 30 2008, 02:05 PM) Character wise, the Barbarian is pretty much the same brute as his old self or even D1's warrior. The Witch Doctor however seems like a similar alternative to the Necromancer, nothing special. It's hard to come out with new and unique character classes nowadays as every ARPG will surely have a warrior, a ranged fighter, a spell caster, a summoner, and possibly a cleric-type supportive character. I'm hoping for something new and special, not just a rehash of previous ideas. Having said that, I have no ideas on how to improve on this... I'd love to see a gunslinger but there are no guns in the world of Diablo. Maybe, we could have a character class of angels, like Tyrael...  I also hope "SON OF SPARDA" will be a playable class but LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sichiri
|
Jul 1 2008, 08:47 PM
|
|
Maybe thats actually Deckard Cain's wife...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sichiri
|
Jul 4 2008, 03:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Archaven @ Jul 4 2008, 02:57 PM) I understand that. But Diablo 3 is not an MMO why would people encourage to pay for it?  . I'm not as good in explaining to others but i found this post summarized what i have in mind: Diablo 3 is not MMO, thus no need to pay Rm55 monthly. Just the Retail CD price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sichiri
|
Jul 4 2008, 03:16 PM
|
|
QUOTE Blizz is making over 1billion dollars a year off of your monthly subscriptions. Look at how many people are playing, then multiply that number by 15. I know it may be difficult but try it the numbers are out there just takes a little research. Now since many of you do not know just how much a billion is ill try to explain it to you. 1 million seconds is about 11.5 days...to where 1 billion seconds is about 31.7 YEARS. No one can tell me that pay roll, business expenses, RnD, and actual Programming and integration is costing any where near that amount. Where do you think that they came up with the money to make the D3 and where do you think that they will get the money to update it and keep it running smooth. Diablo is kinda like the Corvett. Chevy makes little to NO money of of it each year, however it is A BIG DEAL so they keep it around because they are not really loosing money off it, they are just not making much. And it does not matter if they dont make much because their sales off of other vehicles carries it. Again the numbers are out there, look it up. I don't see any sense in this part lolz. Added on July 4, 2008, 3:18 pmQUOTE(Archaven @ Jul 4 2008, 03:16 PM) BATTLE.NET Battle.net has never required a fee, however that is not to say that they will not. Until there is official word no one will know. Blogging about it will not get you the information you are looking for. ^^ Not really though. The fanbase can certainly change things around when they are requesting it to be Pay2Play. That's the fuss there. I'm sure you don't like it to be Pay2Play right? It's gaining huge popularity in that thread too and many is voting for Pay2Play. Don't think it's really feeding the trolls. Blizzard will not make it P2P. Period. This post has been edited by Sichiri: Jul 4 2008, 03:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sichiri
|
Jul 4 2008, 03:45 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Archaven @ Jul 4 2008, 03:36 PM) That's just your opinion. Besides nothing is final. You don't make the call. Blizzard makes the decision. If the fanbase is so strong they are urging for Pay2Play, they may actually change it. Blizzard does listen to its fan. They frequent the board they are aware of the graphics that the fan doesn't like. If you think insulting me is going to make you look smart, i've already get used to all this shit on the net. Didn't know you are one of the trolls too  Blizzard is NOT EA, hell, even EA games wouldn't make their free online servers P2P. If Blizzard wants to make B.net P2P, they have to make Diablo, Starcraft, Warcraft 3 and DOTA(!!!) p2p as well because they're all using the same Battle.net server! Blizzard does listen to their players but they take serious consideration on any changes they do, and not simply based on popular demand This post has been edited by Sichiri: Jul 4 2008, 03:55 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sichiri
|
Feb 10 2010, 02:52 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Deimos Tel`Arin @ Feb 10 2010, 01:55 PM) hmmm diablo ... so i guess manyak people will buy diablo 2 when it is out oh? and ... i noticed that there are like, totally no blizzard games available on steam. digital distribution for blizzard's game is totally out of the question eh? They have. its called battle.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sichiri
|
Aug 3 2011, 09:44 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Aug 2 2011, 11:24 PM) Starcraft 2 is great for those who are spending 2 hours each day to play the game, but for those who are also playing other games, SC2 is just a waste of time and money. It is because SC2 is not a game, it's a sport. Speaking of sport, i might as well pick up a real sport or go to a gym than putting so much time in one game that brings nothing other than entertainment for most people. Fussy aren't you? Even if you don't like the laddering in SC2 you can still have heaps of fun off its custom maps, which only grows more and more by the day. May I suggest Star Battle or Battlecraft for starters?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sichiri
|
Aug 4 2011, 11:15 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Aug 4 2011, 10:34 PM) blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah Blizz sucks. Alright, we get it, you hate Blizzard. Stop ranting.
|
|
|
|
|