Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Has Service Pack 1 Made Your PC Run Better?, Windows® Vista™ Service Pack 1

views
     
TSdefaultname365
post Jun 18 2008, 12:35 AM, updated 18y ago

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
user posted image

Three major areas of improvement with Service Pack 1:
1. Reliability and performance
2. Administration experience
3. Support for newer hardware and standards

user posted image

Download the standalone version here :

32bit version
http://download.microsoft.com/download/3/a...0-X86-wave0.exe

64bit version
http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/3...0-X64-wave0.exe







CZero
post Jun 18 2008, 01:02 AM

Something For Nothing
*****
Senior Member
823 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: 0:0:0:0:0:0:7f00:1
Yup, mucccccccchhhhhhhhhhh betta. 'nuff said.
seiji_kun
post Jun 18 2008, 01:12 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
641 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: ShAh AlAm..



depend on ur pc spec lo bt for smooth use sp1 lor...
Grand Inquisitor
post Jun 18 2008, 02:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
403 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
no... just the same
seiji_kun
post Jun 18 2008, 05:12 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
641 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: ShAh AlAm..



what the same??
Aoshi_88
post Jun 18 2008, 08:11 AM

Talking isn't difficult. Speaking is.
*******
Senior Member
4,670 posts

Joined: Dec 2004


My transfer speeds are better and much more stable. <3 But there isn't much difference elsewhere. Not that it's noticeable to me anyway.
AMDAthlon
post Jun 18 2008, 08:28 AM

The future is Fusion
*******
Senior Member
5,221 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: Deneb star


For me yes,improved slightly and much more stable.
Skylinestar
post Jun 18 2008, 10:22 AM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
Vista Ultimate (without any update) - my pc takes 2 minutes to start up, including those busy hdd activity (indexing) till hdd activity stop.

Now...with SP1 and Windows Search4, takes 1 minute only.
and the pc spec is just sempron 2GHz with 1GB DDR400 ram.
Cheesenium
post Jun 18 2008, 10:33 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Is it ok to update to SP1 when i still have uncertified drivers in my system?
FarCry3r
post Jun 18 2008, 11:03 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



I'm quite happy with SP1, no more BSOD when running vLite on Vista. Only two problem though, Product (RED) screensaver isn't working and there's signed drivers enforcement with SP1, no matter X86 or X64...

QUOTE(Cheesenium @ Jun 18 2008, 10:33 AM)
Is it ok to update to SP1 when i still have uncertified drivers in my system?
*
I have replied on your thread, read there for a solution...
TSdefaultname365
post Jun 18 2008, 11:22 AM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
I'd say majority of users experience improvements, and currently the poll confirms this.

Service Pack 1 is all the more reasons to get Windows Vista today.
Core_Tracer
post Jun 18 2008, 08:21 PM

4 Stars Prodigy
****
Senior Member
599 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: Finding the Core



overall performance is better and stable.....only my sidebar still have problem,some gadgets didnt showed properly
ham_revilo
post Jun 19 2008, 05:28 AM

I
*******
Senior Member
6,583 posts

Joined: Feb 2008


QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Jun 18 2008, 11:22 AM)
I'd say majority of users experience improvements, and currently the poll confirms this.

Service Pack 1 is all the more reasons to get Windows Vista today.
*
agree with u bro. sp1 is great if u get to install it witout any problem. i feel transfering files are faster than usual and less memory hogging with sp1

This post has been edited by ham_revilo: Jun 19 2008, 05:29 AM
REDFlELD
post Jun 19 2008, 06:56 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
660 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL & Perak
Service Pack 1 did nothing to solve the problem I'm having... crash(BSoD) when playing videos.
Does anyone here have this problem or is it just me only?
dopodplaya
post Jun 19 2008, 01:06 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,280 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(REDFlELD @ Jun 19 2008, 06:56 AM)
Service Pack 1 did nothing to solve the problem I'm having... crash(BSoD) when playing videos.
Does anyone here have this problem or is it just me only?
*
only you - because no details from you.
even with SP1 - playing video is smoothly even with H.264 video.
overmars
post Jun 19 2008, 01:22 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
216 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
somehow i feel that shut down now gets so much longer with SP1...now it takes me close to 1 minute to shut down...i wonder why...last time shut down was only 15 seconds or so


Added on June 19, 2008, 1:24 pmother than that i dont really see any visible improvement...kind of a disappointment for me...no improvement yet shutting down takes longer time

This post has been edited by overmars: Jun 19 2008, 01:24 PM
FarCry3r
post Jun 19 2008, 01:46 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jun 19 2008, 01:06 PM)
only you - because no details from you.
even with SP1 - playing video is smoothly even with H.264 video.
*
my Vista never have lagginess playing H.264 videos even not on SP1 before. Lesser application crashes too... thumbup.gif
juiced
post Jun 19 2008, 03:13 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
44 posts

Joined: Mar 2006


i voted yes....a much more stable and less memory hogging environment since using sp1 with all the current updates...
Skylinestar
post Jun 19 2008, 08:18 PM

Mega Duck
********
All Stars
10,479 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Sarawak
my video and audio playback are smoother. it solves my Quicktime BSOD issue.

but shut down takes longer time than before.
SilentE
post Jun 19 2008, 08:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
228 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Subang Jaya, Selangor.



SP1 is better, but still have issues.

Wait till SP2 comes and there should be no problem with it! ;D
pornstar
post Jun 20 2008, 09:00 AM

All.night.long.
*****
Senior Member
798 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: The SS


my startup/shutdown time decreased marginally but the vista experience feels pretty much the same. maybe my laptop specs is not that powerful enough to fully realize the improvements?
FarCry3r
post Jun 20 2008, 09:32 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(SilentE @ Jun 19 2008, 08:54 PM)
SP1 is better, but still have issues.

Wait till SP2 comes and there should be no problem with it! ;D
*
why are you so sure that SP2 will solves all the problem? WinXP, even with SP3, still got lots of issues... unsure.gif
TSdefaultname365
post Jun 20 2008, 10:18 AM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Jun 20 2008, 09:32 AM)
why are you so sure that SP2 will solves all the problem? WinXP, even with SP3, still got lots of issues... unsure.gif
*
The problem with people (includes computer users) is that, when something new is released, the second released or the consequent releases are assumed to be better, and that's what they'll wait for.

Playing the waiting game in the computing world is rewarding, but heck, you got to be on something at some point.

I choose Windows Vista and SP1 as the choice of operating sytem today. I won't say "Nah, I don't want Vista, I'll wait for Windows 7." That's just plain silly.

Or...

"I don't think Vista SP1 is any better, I'll wait for SP2 and then I'll really get into Vista."

What I'm saying is that, Vista is now even more perfect than ever with SP1.



yvliew
post Jun 20 2008, 02:22 PM

Listening to IU - Strawberry Moon
*******
Senior Member
3,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
400+ MB only? Is this Vista SP1????
tolong_saye
post Jun 20 2008, 03:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
408 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
it just an update
not full bootable installation dvd
yvliew
post Jun 20 2008, 04:28 PM

Listening to IU - Strawberry Moon
*******
Senior Member
3,918 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
i thought it would be bigger.. so u mean if i got the old vista installer.. after i install it i run this update.. i get vista sp1?

can post the link to download Vista Ultimate SP1 full bootable dvd image?? I try to download but seems cannot..

I have genuine vista ultimate retail..

This post has been edited by yvliew: Jun 20 2008, 04:30 PM
TSdefaultname365
post Jun 20 2008, 06:26 PM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(yvliew @ Jun 20 2008, 04:28 PM)
i thought it would be bigger.. so u mean if i got the old vista installer.. after i install it i run this update.. i get vista sp1?

can post the link to download Vista Ultimate SP1 full bootable dvd image?? I try to download but seems cannot..

I have genuine vista ultimate retail..
*
Please stick to the topic.

If you want more information about SP1, go here :
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/623655
wjfong
post Jun 20 2008, 10:45 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
69 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
yaya, all my network issues clear d...happy with it...
scph50004
post Jun 20 2008, 10:47 PM

Für die lulz
****
Senior Member
692 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Soviet Sarawak


a lot less crashes, but there's still work to be done.
TSdefaultname365
post Jul 15 2008, 02:42 PM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
In May 2008 issue of The Official Windows Vista Magazine, they have an entire article on Service Pack 1.

In it, their results before and after SP1 is enough to prove than Vista SP1 is all the more reasons to get the operating system today.

However, in the test 'Crysis', the frame rate before SP1 was 30fps and after is 28fps.

File transfer to 'external hard drive' is slightly slower, but that's fine.

Overall, 80% of the tests conducted clearly showed that SP1 delivers better overall performance.
linkinstreet
post Jul 15 2008, 02:49 PM

Red Bull Addict
Group Icon
Moderator
9,277 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said

2FPS difference is too little to be detected by the eyes. You need at least 5~6 FPS before you can see the difference lol
kokifung
post Jul 16 2008, 06:44 PM

KnOw NoThInG...
*******
Senior Member
2,682 posts

Joined: Jul 2005
From: bukit jelutong, shah alam


i am some problem..
i do not know why this still occur although is SP1..

user posted image

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

ForCe
post Jul 18 2008, 05:13 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
260 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: OaSiS



no improvement
myee
post Jul 19 2008, 01:08 PM

>>>>>SAMA Inside<<<<<
******
Senior Member
1,157 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Kuantan


correct me if i'm wrong....after update to vista ultimate service pack 1...my usb port seems to not function at all...it's detect but unable to open any of date in my any of thumb drive...so i just go back to normal vista ultimate...all of it back to normal again....
Kiemi
post Jul 22 2008, 07:05 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
835 posts

Joined: May 2008
QUOTE(myee @ Jul 19 2008, 02:08 PM)
correct me if i'm wrong....after update to vista ultimate service pack 1...my usb port seems to not function at all...it's detect but unable to open any of date in my any of thumb drive...so i just go back to normal vista ultimate...all of it back to normal again....
*
Install latest driver first b4 install the sp nod.gif

Sp really got me some improvement. Cpu usage decreasing, ram usage decreasing, all things become more faster than b4. My laptop juz hve 1.8Ghz, 1Gb ram biggrin.gif

cloudstrife07
post Jul 22 2008, 07:12 AM

I'm back, beaches!
*******
Senior Member
4,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: http://127.0.0.1


as for me, got huge improvement because i didnt update the original vista to SP1, but rather install vista that has been integrated with SP1.

more stable than before, however my winamp often crashes though sweat.gif
linkinstreet
post Jul 22 2008, 12:55 PM

Red Bull Addict
Group Icon
Moderator
9,277 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said

WMP or Foobar >>>> winamp
cloudstrife07
post Jul 22 2008, 01:44 PM

I'm back, beaches!
*******
Senior Member
4,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: http://127.0.0.1


QUOTE(linkinstreet @ Jul 22 2008, 12:55 PM)
WMP or Foobar >>>> winamp
*
i got some plugins to use, like leoslyric and that karaoke plugin.

and winamp's sound quality is much better than WMP and foober from my comparison.
DeLarafi
post Jul 26 2008, 06:24 PM

Ammar Tycoon
******
Senior Member
1,423 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Yasud - Tash Murkon


With 4GB of RAM... the diffrent is obvious.. much much more faster and smoother...


SeaMonster
post Jul 26 2008, 06:38 PM

192.168.1.1
*******
Senior Member
2,056 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: (n_n)


It's Seem Like The Same..

Just The Ram Can Support 4Gb Nia..

Internet Explorer Still Have Terrible Issue..
Might Change To FireFox


FarCry3r
post Jul 28 2008, 08:18 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(SeaMonster @ Jul 26 2008, 06:38 PM)
It's Seem Like The Same..

Just The Ram Can Support 4Gb Nia..

Internet Explorer Still Have Terrible Issue..
Might Change To FireFox
*
what kind of issues? I don't have any issues with IE except for Flashget IE plugin crashes whenever I hover my mouse over them... hmm.gif
TSdefaultname365
post Jul 28 2008, 09:14 AM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(SeaMonster @ Jul 26 2008, 06:38 PM)
It's Seem Like The Same..

Just The Ram Can Support 4Gb Nia..

Internet Explorer Still Have Terrible Issue..
Might Change To FireFox
*
32bit Vista only 'displays' 4Gb of memory if you have that much. It still uses only 3Gb memory.

Snuffykl
post Jul 30 2008, 09:44 AM

**emolified**
*****
Senior Member
835 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Malacca



QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Jul 28 2008, 09:14 AM)
32bit Vista only 'displays' 4Gb of memory if you have that much. It still uses only 3Gb memory.
*
so if we change to 64bit Vista it detect 4Gb of memory?
fariz
post Jul 30 2008, 10:25 AM

Tan Sri F
Group Icon
VIP
16,825 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Siberia
QUOTE(Snuffykl @ Jul 30 2008, 09:44 AM)
so if we change to 64bit Vista it detect 4Gb of memory?
*
detect and fully use 4GB
akagidemon
post Aug 15 2008, 11:56 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
453 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Between Reality and Fantasy


sp1. i notice that vista is more stable,my lappy starts up a little sluggish but very fast shutting down (like the laptop very lazy to go to work but like to cabut early for rest.)

other then that i can;t see any noticeable improvement. some games plays better too.
username
post Aug 16 2008, 01:27 PM

Why so serious?
*******
Senior Member
2,130 posts

Joined: Oct 2004
From: Miri


Never really tried Vista until SP1 was released. So far so good with it. I'm very satisfied.
LEVIATHAN
post Aug 16 2008, 01:34 PM

Master Chief Carl M. Brashear
*******
Senior Member
2,281 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: Littleroot Town



One thing I don't like after SP1 is, Agnitum Outpost Firewall Pro 2009 Build 6.5 intermittently failed to start during startup. It causes drag to my system, and I need to log off and re-log on to make it correct. Nothing much, but it's a little irritating to waste some seconds just to make the thing works.
outdoorxplorer
post Aug 16 2008, 01:36 PM

~Money Only Bring Pleasures When You Spent It WISELY!~
*******
Senior Member
2,028 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, MYS


yes it reports 4gb or more if installed.

QUOTE(Snuffykl @ Jul 30 2008, 09:44 AM)
so if we change to 64bit Vista it detect 4Gb of memory?
*
QUOTE(fariz @ Jul 30 2008, 10:25 AM)
detect and fully use 4GB
*
it is stable on x64.

QUOTE(akagidemon @ Aug 15 2008, 11:56 PM)
sp1. i notice that vista is more stable,my lappy starts up a little sluggish but very fast shutting down (like the laptop very lazy to go to work but like to cabut early for rest.)

other then that i can;t see any noticeable improvement. some games plays better too.
*
another satified user.

QUOTE(username @ Aug 16 2008, 01:27 PM)
Never really tried Vista until SP1 was released. So far so good with it. I'm very satisfied.
*
cwk88
post Aug 16 2008, 08:18 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
653 posts

Joined: Dec 2006


sp1 much betta for me ^^
whoknowz
post Aug 16 2008, 08:20 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
518 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


i voted NO... as more of my hardware are having problems detecting...
both my epson cx3500 (multifunction printer) and canon mp140 drivers canot be installed...
tried downloading latest drivers and installing them but still the os wouldnt detect the printers/scanners...
whereas it used to work pre-sp1... shocking.gif

-just passing by......-
TSdefaultname365
post Aug 18 2008, 09:01 AM

Windows® 8.1 | Xbox 360™ | PlayStation® 4
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(whoknowz @ Aug 16 2008, 08:20 PM)
i voted NO... as more of my hardware are having problems detecting...
both my epson cx3500 (multifunction printer) and canon mp140 drivers canot be installed...
tried downloading latest drivers and installing them but still the os wouldnt detect the printers/scanners...
whereas it used to work pre-sp1...  shocking.gif

-just passing by......-
*
Microsoft did warn about more compatibility issues after SP1 has been installed.
Vor
post Aug 18 2008, 09:14 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: ☐ Singapork ☐ Tongsan ☐ Indon ☑ Malingsia



Well after switching from XP 32 bit SP2 to Vista 64 bit SP1, all I can say is theres no any weird issues such as claimed by most forummers here. Everything is smooth and fine.

- Copy file no prob
- boot time no prob
- shut down time no prob thou hibernate is better
- all softwares and games have no compatibility issues, heck even my 3D rendering stuff has speedup

I really suggest new users to read and understand your PC specs and list down the softwares you are using to check weather its compatible or not before jumping into the wagon just because u want a Vista OS. Bottom line is I am very satisfy with my genuine Vista smile.gif
imsmiko
post Aug 18 2008, 09:38 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
381 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(dopodplaya @ Jun 19 2008, 01:06 PM)
only you - because no details from you.
even with SP1 - playing video is smoothly even with H.264 video.
*
what codec program you use. my klite is lagging?
FarCry3r
post Aug 18 2008, 09:55 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(imsmiko @ Aug 18 2008, 09:38 AM)
what codec program you use. my klite is lagging?
*
I used k-lite codec pack, but never lag when playing any video files?
imsmiko
post Aug 18 2008, 10:00 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
381 posts

Joined: Jul 2008


QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Aug 18 2008, 09:55 AM)
I used k-lite codec pack, but never lag when playing any video files?
*
which version? i use both 3.6 and 4.14 same. lags.
stinger
post Aug 19 2008, 05:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
333 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: 夢の国


QUOTE(imsmiko @ Aug 18 2008, 10:00 AM)
which version? i use both 3.6 and 4.14 same. lags.
*
4.14 user here, no problem at all.


However, I don't recommend for ppl who are very busy with their lives to upgrade to vista, it took me at least 4 hours to upgrade from XP to vista and plus about 1 hour to upgrade to SP 1, and i haven't included the time needed to clean those temp files, xp directories during transition to vista, and as usual there are still some tweaking to do after upgrade complete. Slower startup is expected but im glad only longer for few secs (around 40-50s).

And I noticed that using Vista definitely need 17'' monitor and above, those icons are freaking bigger than XP even its in minimum size, but overall i'm satisfied with Vista SP1, nvr had any problems or major issues after 2-3 weeks using it.
FarCry3r
post Aug 19 2008, 05:21 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(imsmiko @ Aug 18 2008, 10:00 AM)
which version? i use both 3.6 and 4.14 same. lags.
*
I used various 3.x and 4.x release, no problem at all. But my WinXP laptop that have 256mb RAM lags when playing MKV files (with HD resolution)...
Vor
post Aug 19 2008, 07:23 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
388 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: ☐ Singapork ☐ Tongsan ☐ Indon ☑ Malingsia



QUOTE(imsmiko @ Aug 18 2008, 09:38 AM)
what codec program you use. my klite is lagging?
*
is your display driver installed? cause that might be the cause. I am using klite 4.14 with no issues
adib1992
post Aug 19 2008, 08:34 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: May 2008



its better than xp... but, kalo hardware x masuk ngan vista mmg vista akan slow.. so hardware kene meet spec vista baru gempaq... so far agu gune mmg best... vista 64 ngan amd athlon 64 x2 4600+.. fu-yoh, mmg laju pc aku...
acoms
post Aug 20 2008, 04:08 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
90 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
as for me, I'm very satisfied with Vista SP1. No more crash....huhuhu
jinaun
post Aug 20 2008, 04:11 PM

where are my stars???
Group Icon
Elite
6,139 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i dun even have any problem with pre-sp1
linkinstreet
post Aug 20 2008, 04:42 PM

Red Bull Addict
Group Icon
Moderator
9,277 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said

QUOTE(stinger @ Aug 19 2008, 05:15 PM)
4.14 user here, no problem at all.
However, I don't recommend for ppl who are very busy with their lives to upgrade to vista, it took me at least 4 hours to upgrade from XP to vista and plus about 1 hour to upgrade to SP 1, and i haven't included the time needed to clean those temp files, xp directories during transition to vista, and as usual there are still some tweaking to do after upgrade complete. Slower startup is expected but im glad only longer for few secs (around 40-50s).

And I noticed that using Vista definitely need 17'' monitor and above, those icons are freaking bigger than XP even its in minimum size, but overall i'm satisfied with Vista SP1, nvr had any problems or major issues after 2-3 weeks using it.
*

Well I do a fresh install instead of upgrade and as the DVD is already preloaded with SP1, I don't have to download it again. From start to finish it took me just 20 minutes

desmond1310
post Aug 21 2008, 08:22 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
231 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: MMU Melaka


Does anyone here have a Canon MP160 printer? How's the compatibility of this driver with SP1? So far it's working fine on my bro's laptop with non-SP1 Vista Ultimate here.
linkinstreet
post Aug 21 2008, 09:15 AM

Red Bull Addict
Group Icon
Moderator
9,277 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said

if it works in vanilla vista it works for SP1
desmond1310
post Aug 21 2008, 12:47 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
231 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
From: MMU Melaka


Thanks linkinstreet!
cielBleu
post Aug 22 2008, 09:47 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
320 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
do we need to download manually or just included in windows update?
linkinstreet
post Aug 22 2008, 09:48 AM

Red Bull Addict
Group Icon
Moderator
9,277 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: KL. Best place in Malaysia. Nuff said

You can choose to download manually but usually it's there in windows update
FarCry3r
post Aug 22 2008, 10:02 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



you can manually download the updates if you need to build Vista DVD image that contains the latest updates/hotfixes so it will save you reupdating again whenever you formatted your PC...
chanhin
post Aug 22 2008, 11:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,615 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Jul 28 2008, 09:14 AM)
32bit Vista only 'displays' 4Gb of memory if you have that much. It still uses only 3Gb memory.
*
That's the thing I hate about 32 bit OS now... I believe with 1GB graphic card... 4GB RAM become less than 3GB... And what if you SLI 2 1GB card? 4GB become less than 2GB.... It will make the gamers really stupid...

Thus I guess it is time to move into 64-bits... At least on the name of gaming... brows.gif

QUOTE(jinaun @ Aug 20 2008, 04:11 PM)
i dun even have any problem with pre-sp1
*
I was about to say that... tongue.gif
ken6828
post Jan 8 2009, 04:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
241 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Safe_Trader



i felt that It seems the same,mb will try SP2
Liuteva
post Jan 8 2009, 07:12 PM

Empty.
*******
Senior Member
2,991 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor


Can this upgrade on *Ahem* Vista 64 Bit?

Btw mine is OEM, it works?

This post has been edited by Liuteva: Jan 8 2009, 07:13 PM
spawnster83
post Jan 8 2009, 07:17 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
101 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia



hahaha.. Same here. Maybe i'm too numb to feel anything rclxub.gif

QUOTE(ken6828 @ Jan 8 2009, 04:12 PM)
i felt that It seems the same,mb will try SP2
*
cloudstrife07
post Jan 9 2009, 07:32 PM

I'm back, beaches!
*******
Senior Member
4,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: http://127.0.0.1


QUOTE(chanhin @ Aug 22 2008, 11:04 AM)
That's the thing I hate about 32 bit OS now... I believe with 1GB graphic card... 4GB RAM become less than 3GB... And what if you SLI 2 1GB card? 4GB become less than 2GB.... It will make the gamers really stupid...

*
what are u talking about?graphic card memory is not related to system's memory. sweat.gif
tech3910
post Jan 9 2009, 08:02 PM

Anonymous
*******
Senior Member
5,644 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Heaven to HELL


QUOTE(ken6828 @ Jan 8 2009, 04:12 PM)
i felt that It seems the same,mb will try SP2
*
i think u better stick wit sp1.
sp2 bring some extra features, but not extra performance.
review show it open program faster, but suffer a bit wen running actual application, like gaming.
u can check out a review here.
http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/2008/12/10/wi...a-performance/1
SUSMatrix
post Jan 9 2009, 08:22 PM

King of Char Siew!
********
Senior Member
15,022 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Damansara Jaya/Bandar Utama


QUOTE(cloudstrife07 @ Jan 9 2009, 07:32 PM)
what are u talking about?graphic card memory is not related to system's memory. sweat.gif
*
I think it does. The area between 3GB+ and 4GB is reserved for video memory, BIOS and other rubbish. If you have a 1GB card, i think u should see < 3GB. Anyone with a 1GB VGA can confirm this?
dylanchan1688
post Jan 9 2009, 08:24 PM

PuLu™
**
Senior Member
125 posts

Joined: May 2008
From: Petaling Jaya



sp1 made my com alot faster
FarCry3r
post Jan 9 2009, 09:26 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(cloudstrife07 @ Jan 9 2009, 07:32 PM)
what are u talking about?graphic card memory is not related to system's memory. sweat.gif
*
Yes it does, Windows 32-bit can only use maximum of 4GB of memories, and that's includes your video card memories.
cloudstrife07
post Jan 9 2009, 09:52 PM

I'm back, beaches!
*******
Senior Member
4,688 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: http://127.0.0.1


QUOTE(Matrix @ Jan 9 2009, 08:22 PM)
I think it does. The area between 3GB+ and 4GB is reserved for video memory, BIOS and other rubbish. If you have a 1GB card, i think u should see < 3GB. Anyone with a 1GB VGA can confirm this?
QUOTE(FarCry3r @ Jan 9 2009, 09:26 PM)
Yes it does, Windows 32-bit can only use maximum of 4GB of memories, and that's includes your video card memories.
O.o i don't know this. quite a new info to me hmm.gif

any external links to prove?sorry but i just need better understanding of it.
swks26
post Jan 9 2009, 10:18 PM

CEO RM20k/day
*****
Senior Member
942 posts

Joined: Jan 2007
No idea what's the difference. Ahahah. Probably didn't get the feel of before SP1 to know how much change there was...
unknownsubject
post Jan 9 2009, 11:52 PM

form blazing sword...
*****
Senior Member
895 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: Voltron Force
just installed xp1 a few days ago.installing all service packs are a big waste of time.quite literally

but after sp1, my ultimate runs smoother and somehow the dreamscene doesn't lag/frame drop anymore.

4gb of ram shows 4 gb on sys info, but under resources it still goes to 3gb....time to switch to x64
TechnoDude94
post Jan 13 2009, 11:37 AM

Happiness Advocate
*******
Senior Member
6,738 posts

Joined: Dec 2006
From: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Eau Claire, Wisconsin


QUOTE(unknownsubject @ Jan 9 2009, 11:52 PM)
just installed xp1 a few days ago.installing all service packs are a big waste of time.quite literally

but after sp1, my ultimate runs smoother and somehow the dreamscene doesn't lag/frame drop anymore.

4gb of ram shows 4 gb on sys info, but under resources it still goes to 3gb....time to switch to x64
*
You don't needa' install previous SPs before installing the latest version. Example:
You don't needa' install SP2 to install SP3. whistling.gif
I'd recommend that you vLite/Integrate SPs into your WIndows installations discs. Example:
I've got Windows XP Pro with SP3 built-in and Windows Vista Ultimate with SP1 vLited/Integrated. Therefore, I don't needa' re-install SPs after every reformat/reinstallation. icon_rolleyes.gif
refugeez86
post Jan 13 2009, 01:17 PM

rules are made to be broken
******
Senior Member
1,591 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: on chair...

no problem wif me so far..vista sp1 run smooth on my pc..
frostmourne
post Jan 14 2009, 12:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
219 posts

Joined: Sep 2006
From: Kuantan, Pahang


not too much different. but SP1 is better.
FuiLo
post Feb 7 2009, 11:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
252 posts

Joined: Sep 2007
From: Sandakan,Sabah


after installing SP1 runs better smile.gif
SUSwilsonjay
post Feb 8 2009, 11:59 AM

6 Stars Social Justice Warrior
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


nv tried the first 1....so i have no idead how laggy is the 1st 1..but my dad says it takes up alot of resources...
doremon
post Feb 8 2009, 02:42 PM

eMPtiNess =`(
*******
Senior Member
2,621 posts

Joined: Jan 2005



Guyz, any idea what's the latest Vista now? Is it SP2?
FarCry3r
post Feb 8 2009, 02:47 PM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(doremon @ Feb 8 2009, 02:42 PM)
Guyz, any idea what's the latest Vista now? Is it SP2?
*
SP2 is still in beta
nikessj4
post Feb 8 2009, 04:53 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
469 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: PENANG



smooth vroooooooommmmmmmmmmm
Liuteva
post Feb 9 2009, 08:11 AM

Empty.
*******
Senior Member
2,991 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor


SP1 more stable for me, and it is slightly faster IMO.
hussam_o_r
post Feb 11 2009, 04:12 PM

NOT IN MALAYSIA ANYMORE
****
Senior Member
517 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Jeddah


yes but seems no sp is faster with no updates
SUSwilsonjay
post Feb 11 2009, 08:19 PM

6 Stars Social Justice Warrior
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


QUOTE(hussam_o_r @ Feb 11 2009, 04:12 PM)
yes but seems no sp is faster with no updates
*
u need the updates to upgrade sp la...
Kain_Sicilian
post Feb 11 2009, 08:43 PM

Not So Friendly
*****
Senior Member
844 posts

Joined: Sep 2005
From: Mars, where else?


Yup, runs faster after I install SP1 on X32. And even faster when I switch to X64
Qute
post Feb 12 2009, 10:57 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
208 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: KayElLL


I don't get it. Did you actually mean X86 instead of X32?
SUSwilsonjay
post Feb 12 2009, 10:57 AM

6 Stars Social Justice Warrior
******
Senior Member
1,605 posts

Joined: Feb 2006


QUOTE(Qute @ Feb 12 2009, 10:57 AM)
I don't get it. Did you actually mean X86 instead of X32?
*
lol..ya thats he mean...some ppl get confuse about that...
FarCry3r
post Feb 12 2009, 11:58 AM

Where did my ♥ go?
*******
Senior Member
6,543 posts

Joined: Dec 2004
From: Miri



QUOTE(Qute @ Feb 12 2009, 10:57 AM)
I don't get it. Did you actually mean X86 instead of X32?
*
X32, X86, 32-bit is the same shit. X64, 64-bit is also the same. But people rarely use X32...
Liuteva
post Feb 13 2009, 10:20 AM

Empty.
*******
Senior Member
2,991 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: Johor


SP1 needed for some games just like GTA IV
mythminded
post Feb 15 2009, 12:11 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
62 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
From: Never Neverland


Seems better... thumbup.gif wink.gif

This post has been edited by mythminded: Feb 15 2009, 12:11 PM
kumiko_91
post Feb 19 2009, 11:48 AM

这个世界有咁大,你又点玩嗮~
******
Senior Member
1,053 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: 我来无影,去无踪。



Vista Sp1 is more stable.

As for 4GB RAM, use 64 bit OS.
thken
post Feb 22 2009, 10:18 PM

keep walking
*****
Senior Member
938 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
From: where I belong to....


nono
same
still the same
mine using athlonx2 4200, 2 gb ram

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0830sec    0.78    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 11:12 AM