Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 not satisfied with some ps3 titles

views
     
vorchiel
post Jun 2 2008, 12:42 PM

ლ(ಠ_ಠ ლ)
****
Senior Member
666 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Left Hand Society, West London
Ask sabrina about this. She is an expert.

/OT


It is more cost-effective for the publishers to work on 360 first. It has a bigger installed userbase etc.
vorchiel
post Jun 2 2008, 12:53 PM

ლ(ಠ_ಠ ლ)
****
Senior Member
666 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Left Hand Society, West London
QUOTE(nerd @ Jun 2 2008, 12:44 PM)
in what way does a big userbase leads to cost-effectiveness?

I think you meant to say it's easier to program for the Xbox 360 compared to the PS3.
*
Publishers push the devs to work on 360 first and then ported the titles to teh CELL. Familiarity with DX-like coding and similarity to PC platform etc made it easier. The devs HAVE to optimise + learn to code on all the SPU/SPEs for the alien architecture, and this takes time. Time = money. So, why not develop for the 360 first as the lead platform?
vorchiel
post Jun 2 2008, 01:04 PM

ლ(ಠ_ಠ ლ)
****
Senior Member
666 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Left Hand Society, West London
Look at 1st/2nd party titles like Uncharted & Ratchet. Sure they look amazing, but who knows how high are the costs of producing both of them (KZ2 & LBP included). Most 3rd party publishers do not want to take risks for multiplat titles (with exeptions to a few- DIRT, COD4 for example). Why put so much effort on platform with smaller userbase anyway? Only time will tell tongue.gif

This post has been edited by vorchiel: Jun 2 2008, 01:05 PM

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0182sec    1.15    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 05:10 AM