QUOTE(jimmyttl @ May 31 2008, 11:14 PM)
cherroy,
saw the newspaper clip that goldman sachs had reduced their holdings to a mere 5% but another Datuk from some other company is snaping up the shares they sold. But I guess Intel would only invest rm50 million if they foresee a substantial return from it and the reason its financial result is in the red is because of the initial investment in rolling out the wimax service.
dreamer101,
have friends working in maxis and they said the internet service based on 3g connection sucks big time and connection speed + coverage is a main issue here, but i'm not sure about the speed of the 3g services provided by celcom though. developed countries only started using the wimax technology recently so I would not say it will be profitable for sure but gpacket claimed its wimax coverage can cover up to 80% of the population base (note population base & not geographical area) and I believe going wireless is cheaper than laying down cables for a broadband (m referring to TM) in the long run. GPacket even hired former TM streamyx's division president as its staff overseeing the wimax department, mind you it is that guy who laid the foundation for tm's successes in streamyx (in term of marketing & sales).
I'm not sure bout the price and I can see why you asked so with celcom & tm bundling their services together but with wimax tech based on a an enhanced version of wifi frequency, I don't expect any problem with speed. :-) I myself is no tech genius though. lol.
To sum it all up, if the statistics provided by gov is true, broadband penetration is sitll less than 20% (out of all the internet users) so I see potentials here.
Besides the divestment by goldman sachs & its financial standing in red, any other news worth to be noted huh?
thanks for participating in the discussions.
to be frank, I'm taking a gamble with this stock, high risk high gain you see =) this is what tech stocks are all about, bout still, it's worth digesting all the risks surrounding it.
jimmyttl,
1) I think the unlimited 3G service is RM99 per month. So, Gpacket's WiMAX service has to be cheaper or at least the same price.
<<I believe going wireless is cheaper than laying down cables for a broadband (m referring to TM) in the long run. >>
2) Yes and no. TM do not have to pay for the cable. The cable cost is FULLY amortized fro Streamyx.
http://www.theedgedaily.com/cms/content.js...276a00-fd8cb43a3) For the new HSBB? project, the government is giving 4.8 billions to TM for the project.
4) For the 3G network, the network had been deployed. TM/Celcom/Maxis can lower their price at any time to kill off any new entrant.
So. what makes you think GPacket can be profitable by deploying a NEW network and charging for RM99 or less per month?
What is the business model?
Dreamer